References
- Stevens S S, et al. The mechanism of hearing by electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1939; 10: 261–9
- Djourno A, Eyries C, Vallencien B. De l'excitation électrique du nerf cochléaire chez l'homme, par induction à distance, à l'aide d'un microbobinage inclus à demeure. C R Société Biologique (Paris). 1957; 151: 423–5
- Rose J E, Brugge J F, Anderson D J, et al. Phase-locked response to low frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1967; 30: 769–93
- House W F, Berliner K, Crary W, et al. Cochlear implants. An Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 27: 1–93, suppl
- Simmons FB. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Arch Otolaryngol. 1966; 84: 2–54
- Michelson RP. Electrical stimulation of human cochlear: A preliminary report. Arch Otolaryngol 1971; 93: 317
- Bilger R, Black F, Hopkins N, et al. Evaluation of subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1977; 38: 1–176, suppl
- Mc Dermott H J, Mc Kay C M, et al. A new portable sound processor for the university of Melbourne/Nucleus limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J Acous Soc Am. 1992; 91: 3367–71
- Lawson D T, Wilson B S, et al. New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear protheses. Progr Brain Res. 1993; 97: 313–21
- Dillier N, Bogli H, Spillmann T. Speech encoding strategies for multielectrode cochlear implants: a digital signal processor approach. Prog Brain Res. 1993; 97: 301–11
- Beliaeff M, Dubus P, Leveau J M, Repetto J C, Vincent P. Sound processing and Stimulation coding of DIGISONIC DX10 15-channel cochlear implant. Advances in cochlear implant., IN Hochmair. Verlag., Innsbruck 1994; 198–203
- Tyler RS, Moore BC. Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 92: 3068–77
- Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–8
- Mahoney M J, Proctor L AR. The Use of averaged electrode voltages to assess the function of nucleus internal cochlear implant devices in children. Ear Hear. 1994; 15: 177–183
- Mens L HM, Oostendorp T, et al. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 330–8
- Mens L HM, Oostendorp T, et al. Cochlear implant generated surface potentials: current spread and site effects. Ear Hear. 1994; 15: 339–45
- Starr A, et al. Brainstem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human subjectes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1979; 88: 550–60
- Abbas P J, et al. Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation. Hear Res. 1988; 36: 153–62
- Gallégo S, Micheyl C, Berger-Vachon C, Tniy E, Mor-Gon A, Collet L. Ipsilateral ABR with cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1996; 116: 228–33
- Gallégo S, Durrant J, Vincent P, Collet L, Berger-Vachon C. Numeric time-frequency filters adapted to the recording of electrically auditory brainstem responses (E-ABR), Submitted
- Honert van den C, Stypulkowski PH. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109–26
- Kasper A, Pelizzone M, Montandon P. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant patients. ORL. 1992; 54: 285–94
- Abbas P J, et al. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: Growth of response with curent level. Hear Res. 1991; 51: 123–38