References
- Ribári O. Differences in speech discrimination with different types of cochlear implants. Proceedings of the XIV World Congress of ORL. Kugler & Ghedini, MadridSpain 1990; 132–4, Amsterdam
- Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 552: 236–8
- Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Zerbi M, . Recent development with the CIS strategies. Advances in cochlear implants, IJ Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair, et al. Manz, Wien 1994; 103–12
- Kiefer J, Müller J, Th Pfennigdorff, et al. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi-40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL. 1996; 58: 127–35
- Ramsden R, Boyd P, Gilles E, Applin Y, Hesketh A. Cochlear implantation of the deaf-blind. Advances in cochlear implants, IJ Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 447–51
- Ribári O, Speer K, Sziklai I, Répássy G. Hearing improvement achieved by different cochlear implantation techniques on the same and contralateral ear. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1992; 112: 225–8
- Ribári O, Sziklai I. Cochlear implantation improves hearing in the contralateral ear. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1995; 115: 260–3
- Ribári O. Cochlear implantation in Hungary. Advances in cochlear implants, IJ Hochmair-Desoyer, ES Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 419–20
- Ribári O, Küstel M, Korpássy P, Speer K. Results with different cochlear implants. Proceedings of the XXIInd Annual Meeting of the International Neuro-Otologic and Equilibriometric Society. Elsevier Science BV, HakoneJapan 1995; 223–6, Amsterdam
- Burian K, Hochmair-Desoyer I J, Eisenwort B. The Vienna cochlear implant program. Otolarngol Clin North Am. 1986; 19: 313–28
- Pfingst BE. Stimulation and encoding strategies for cochlear prostheses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1986; 19: 219–36
- Cohen N L, et al. Influence of processing strategies on cochlear implant performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 164: 9–14, Suppl