References
- Henderson D, Salvi R J, Boettcher F A, . Neurophysiologic correlates of sensori-neural hearing loss. Handbook of clinical audiology., 4th ed., J Katz, et al. Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore 1994; 37–55
- Cervellera G, Quaranta A, Cassano P. Le remote masking: un test de conduction cochleaire. Audiology. 1978; 17: 317–23
- Keith R W, et al. Remote masking for listeners with cochlear impairment. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969; 46: 393–8
- Deatherage B H, Davis H, et al. Physiological evidence of the masking of low frequencies by high. J Acoust Soc Am. 1957; 29: 132–7
- Karlovich K S, et al. Remote masking generated by high-frequency two-tone complexes. Audiology. 1977; 16: 507–21
- McFadden S L, Henderson D, Quaranta A. Remote masking in normal and noise-exposed chinchillas. Au-diol Neurotol, in press
- Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Woodford C, Sitler RW, Salvi RJ. Evoked response audibility curve in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 1099–101
- Murphy W J, et al. Hearing thresholds from auditory evoked potentials: subcutaneous and implanted electrodes. Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1995; 548, Abs
- Henderson D, Spongr V, Subramaniam M, Campo P. Anatomical effects of impact noise. Hear Res. 1994; 76: 101–17
- Salonna I, Sallustio V, Portalatini P, . Rilievi clinico-audiologici in una popolazione omogenea di soggetti esposti a rumore occupazionale. Sordita da rumore: problematiche cliniche e medico-legali, A Quaranta, E Arslan, L Ambrosi, D Henderson, et al. Ecumenica Editrice, Bari 1995; 161–85
- Smoorenburg GF. Audibility region of combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972; 52: 603–14
- Goldstein JL. Auditory non linearity. J Acoust Soc Am. 1967; 41: 676–89
- Kemp D T, et al. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2fl-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea. Hear Res. 1984; 13: 39–46
- Subramaniam M, Henderson D, Spongr V. The relationship among distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, evoked potential thresholds and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Ear Hear. 1994; 15: 299–309
- Subramaniam M, Salvi R J, Spongr V P, Henderson D, et al. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cells following interrupted noise exposures. Hear Res. 1994; 74: 204–16
- Kim D O, Leonard G, Smurzynski J, . Otoacoustic emissions and noise induced hearing loss. Noise induced hearing loss, AL Dancer, D Henderson, RJ Salvi, RP Hamernik, et al. Mosby Year Book, St Louis 1992; 98–105
- Brownell WE. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990; 11: 82–92
- Lonsbury-Martin B L, et al. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 1990; 11: 144–54
- Preyer S, et al. Non-linearity of mechanoelec-trical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of non-linear basilar membrane motion and loudness recruitment. Audiol Neurootol. 1996; 1: 3–11
- Quaranta A, Salonna I. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and cochlear psychoacoustic test: effect of atropine. Adv Audiol. 1990; 7: 171–9
- Portalatini P, Fanizzi P, Camporeale M. Cochlear function in humans treated with salicylate. XXIII International Congress of Audiology 1996; 84, Abs