Ojective Intraoperative Method to Record Averaged Electromyographic Stapedius Muscle Reflexes in Cochlear Implant Patients: Metodo objetivo transoperatorio para el registro electromiográfico promediado de los reflejos del müAsculo estapedial en pacientes con implante coclear

References

• Jerger J F, Jenkins H, Fifer R, Mecklenburg D. Stapedius reflex to electrical stimulation in a patient with a cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 151–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J F, Oliver T A, Chmiel R A. Prediction of dynamic range from stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 4–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan K, Welzl-Miiller K, Stiglbrunner H. Stapedius reflex threshold in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1988; 27: 227–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges A V. The relationship between electric auditory evoked responses and psychophysical percepts obtained through a Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant Unpublished Ph.D. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 1990, dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Gattaz G, Battmer R D, Lehnhardt E, Gnadeberg D. Beziehung zwischen dem elektrisch ausgelosten Stapediusreflex und der Unbehaglichkeitsschwelle bei Cochlear-Implant-Patienten. HNO 1992; 40: 480–483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephan K, Welzl-Miiller K, Stiglbrunner H. Acoustic reflex in patients with cochlear implants (analog stimulation). Am J Otol 1991; 12(Suppl)48–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges A V, Balkany T J, Ruth R A, Lambert P R, Dolan-Ash S, Schloffman J J. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 255–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak L G, Chute P M. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 184–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Borne B, Mens L H, Snik A F, Spies T H, Van den Broek P. Stapedius reflex and EABR thresholds in experienced users of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 114: 141–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallop J K, Ash K R. Relationships among comfort levels determined by cochlear implant patient's self-programming, audiologist's programming and electrical stapedius reflex thresholds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 166: 175–176
   Google Scholar
• Battmer R D, Gnadeberg D, Allum-Mecklenburg D J, Lenarz T. Algorithmic representation of common ground programming in children with the Nucleus device. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 50: 83–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metz O. Studies on the contraction of the tympanic muscles as indicated by changes in the acoustic impedance of the ear. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1951; 109, Suppl:105
   Google Scholar
• Møller A. Intra-aural muscle contraction in man examined by measuring acoustic impedance of the ear. Laryngoscope 1958; 67: 48
   Google Scholar
• Dallos P. Dynamics of the acoustic reflex: phe-nomenological aspects. J Acoust Soc Am 1964; 36: 2175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Tingsgaard J. Discrepancy between the loudness function as measured by the ABLB and the Metz method. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973; 76: 328–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis R H, Popelka G R. Loudness and the acoustic reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 1330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlman HB, Case TJ. Latent period of the crossed stapedius reflex in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1939; 48: 663
   Google Scholar
• Fisch U, Schulthess G. Electromyographic studies on the human stapedial muscle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1963; 56: 287–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Djupesland G, Sundby A, Flottorp G. Temporal summation in the acoustic stapedius reflex mechanism. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1973; 76: 305–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrisson J-E, Borg E, Blom S. The acoustic impedance change as a measure of stapedius muscle activity in man. A methodological study with electromyography. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 78: 357–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi N, Nakatani H. Stapedial electromyograms recorded by electrocochleography. Ann Otol Rhinol Larynol 1988; 97: 87–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lüscher E. Die Funktion des musculus Stapedius beim Menschen. Z Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilk 1929; 23: 105
   Google Scholar
• Jepson O. Studies on the acoustic stapedius reflex in man Measurements of the acoustic impedance of the tympanic membrane in normal individuals and in patients with peripheral facial palsy. Denmark, Unpublished doctoral thesis, University for Physicians, Aarhus 1955
   Google Scholar
• Battmer R-D, Laszig R, Lehnhardt E. Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 370–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfand S A, Silman S, Silverman C A. Temporal summation in acoustic reflex growth functions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1981; 91: 177–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi G, Solero P. Dynamic parameters of the stapedius muscle reflex in response to stimuli of varying duration but with the same energy content. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1984; 97: 460–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi G, Solero P, Rolando M. Influence of stimulus duration and intensity on acoustic reflex parameters. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1985; 99: 348–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawool V W. Click-rate induced facilitation of the acoustic reflex using constant number of pulses. Audiology 1996; 35: 171–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawool V W. Improved intensity coding at faster click-rates within the acoustic reflex pathway. ScandAudiol 1997; 26: 207–210
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V W. Effect of probe frequency and gender on the click-rate induced facilitation of the acoustic reflex thresholds. ScandAudiol 1998; 27: 173–177
   Google Scholar
• Almqvist B, Harris S, Jönsson K-E. Electrical brain stem responses in cochlear implant patients. Cochlear implants: new perspectives, B Fraysse, O Deguine. Karger, Adv Otorhinolaryngol Basel 1993; 130–135
   Google Scholar
• Svensson O, Almqvist B, Jönsson K-E. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering. ScandAudiol 1987; 16: 43–17
   Google Scholar
• Game C JA, Thomson D R, Gibson W PR. Measurement of auditory brainstem responses evoked by electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant. Br JAudiol 1990; 24: 145–149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cochlear Corporation. Technical reference manual Nucleus 22 Channel cochlear implant system. CO, Englewood 1996
   Google Scholar
• Dine O, Nagel D. Messung des akustisch aus-gelosten Stapediusreflexes in lntubationsnarkose. HNO 1986; 34: 75–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farkas Z. Acoustic reflex and general anesthesia. Scand Audiol Suppl 1983; 17: 43–46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar