Speech Perception Test for Arabic-Speaking Children: Prueba de perceptión del habla para niños hablantes del árabe

References

• Boothroyd A. Assessment of speech perception capacity in profoundly deaf children. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 67–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 134–144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N P. Pure tone threshold and word recognition abilities of hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 194–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N P. Use of the Auditory Number Test to evaluate speech perception abilities of hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 3: 527–532
   Google Scholar
• Goetzinger P C. Katz J, ed. Word discrimination testing. Williams and Wilkins, Handbook of clinical audiology Baltimore 1972
   Google Scholar
• Her Kirk K, Diefendorf A O, Pisoni D B, Robbins A M. Assessing speech perception in children. Audiologic evaluation and management and speech perception assessment, L L Mendel, J L Danhauer. Singular, San Diego 1997
   Google Scholar
• Markelein R A. A short speech perception test for severely and profoundly deaf children. Volta Rev 1981; 83: 36–46
   Google Scholar
• Northern J L, Downs M P. Hearing in children. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1974
   Google Scholar
• Siegenthaler B A, Pearson J, Lezak R J. A speech reception threshold for children. J Speech Hear Res 1954; 19: 360–366
   Google Scholar
• Sortini A T, Flake C G. Speech audiometry testing for pre-school children. Laryngoscope 1953; 63: 991–997
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stark E W. Speech audiometry with children, MA1CO Audiological Library Series 1969; 7: 340–350
   Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin L. Assessment of speech perception in hearing-impaired children. J Isr Speech Lang Hear 1999; 21: 99–110
   Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin L, Tatelbaum R, Segal O, . Speech perception: implanted versus aided children. Cochlear implants, S Waltzman, N Cohen, et al. Thieme, New York and Stuttgart 1999; 212–214
   Google Scholar
• Moog G S, Geers A E. Early Speech Perception test for profoundly hearing-impaired children. Central Institute of the Deaf, St Louis 1990
   Google Scholar
• Bakalla. Arabic linguistics: an introduction and bibliography. Mansell, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Kaye A S. Formal vs. informal in Arabic: diglossia, triglossia, tetraglossia etc., Polyglossia, multiglos-sia viewed as a continuum. Z Arab Ling 1994; 27: 47–66
   Google Scholar
• Sela I, Weisel A. The Deaf community in Israel. Ministry of Labour & Social Affairs, IDC, National Insurance Institute and The Association of the Deaf in Israel, Jerusalem 1992
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhouse J. Students with special needs: Arabic speaking children in Israel. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Education of the Deaf, A Weisel, 1995; 489–496
   Google Scholar
• Jaber L, Bailey-Wilson J E, Haj-Ema M, Hernandez J, Shohat M. Consanguineous matings irj Israeli Arab community. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994; 148: 412–415
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zlotogora J. Genetic disorders among Palestinian Arabs: 1. Effects of consanguinity. Am J Mec Genet 1997; 68: 472–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tell L, Feinmesser M, Levi H, Abrahmson B, Nasj A, el-Din R. Etiology of sensorineural childhooc deafness in Arab-Israeli students in a Jerusalerr school of the deaf. J Isr Speech Lang Hear 1999; 21: 132–134
   Google Scholar
• Blau Y. The renaissance of Modern Hebrew and Modern Standard Arabic. University of California Publications, Berkeley, CA 1981
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson C A. Diglossia. Word 1959; 15: 325–340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye A S, Rosenhouse J. The Arabic dialects anc Maltese. The Semitic languages London: Routledge, R Hetzron, 1997; 263–311
   Google Scholar
• Obrecht D. Effect of the 2nd formant in the perception of velarization in Lebanese Arabic. Mouton, The Hague, Paris 1968
   Google Scholar
• Norlin K. A phonetic study of emphasis and vowels in Egyptian Arabic. Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, The University of Lund, LundSweden 1987
   Google Scholar
• Lehn E. Emphasis in Cairo Arabic. Language 1963; 39: 9–39
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ani M. Arabic phonology. Mouton, The Hague, Paris 1970
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson C A. The Arabic koine. Language 1959; 25: 616–630
   Google Scholar
• Blanc H. Style variations in spoken Arabic. Contributions to Arabic linguistics, C A Ferguson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 1960; 81–158
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R S. Speech perception by children. Cochlear implants: audiological foundations, R S Tyler. Singular, San Diego 1993
   Google Scholar
• Alusi H A, Hinchcliffe R, Ingham B, Knight J J, North C. Arabic speech audiometry. Audiology 1974; 13: 212–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashoor A A, Prochazka T. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry. Audiology 1982; 21: 493–508
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Messouak H. Audiometrie vocale en arabe maghrebin. Les Cahiers de la Compagnie Francaise ďAudiologie, Paris 1956
   Google Scholar
• Hanna S T. Relative intelligibility of the Arabic bi-syllabic words. Pennsylvania State University, Graduate School, Speech Pathology and Audiology Program, Philadelphia 1976
   Google Scholar
• Ross M, Lerman J. A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1979; 13: 44–53
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Nofel H, Harah R, Huri R, Mabgish U, Kishon-Rabin L, Muchnik C. Developmental speech perception of young Arabic-speaking children using the Arabic Early Speech Annual Conference, the Dead Sea, Israel. 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hnath Chisolm T, Kishon-Rabin L. Tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as an aid to the perception of speech pattern contrasts. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 329–334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penrod J P. Speech discrimination testing. Handbook of clinical audiology, J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 235–255
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Specifications for audiometers. ANSI, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Ma luf L. Al-Munjid fi Al-Luga (the language support), Arabic-Arabic dictionary. Catholic Printing, Beyrouth 1960
   Google Scholar
• Dubnow J, Levitt H. Consonant confusions from analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69: 249–261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borden G J, Harris K S, Raphael L J. Speech science primer: physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech. Williams & Wilkins, Waverly Company, Baltimore 1994
   Google Scholar
• Kent R D, Read C. The acoustic analysis of speech. Singular, San Diego 1992
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A, Erickson F N, Medwetsky L. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 432–442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Speech acoustics and perception. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1986
   Google Scholar
• Segal O, Kishon-Rabin L, Hildesheimer M. Sensory evidence and the use of context in postlingually deafened adults with hearing aids and cochlear implants. J Isr Speech Lang Hear 1999; 21: 85–98
   Google Scholar