Effect of the Number of Averaged Responses in Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions on the Results of Neonatal Hearing Screening : Efecto del número promediado de emisiones otoacusticas evocadas por transitorios en el tamizaje auditivo nonatal

References

• Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone B M, Patuzzi R, Yates G K. Basilar membrane measurements and travelling waves. Hear Res 1986; 22: 147–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehl A L, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 1–6, E4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray P, Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aidan D, Avan P, Bonfils P. Auditory screening in neonates by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a report of 2,842 recordings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 525–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkin P M. Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 1996; 75: F158–F168
   Google Scholar
• Hunter M F, Kimm L, Cafarlli Dees D, Kennedy C R, Thornton A R. Feasibility of otoacoustic emission detection followed by ABR as a universal neonatal screening test for hearing impairment. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 47–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 18–29
   Google Scholar
• Stevens J C, Webb H D, Hutchinson J, Buffing J T, Smith M F. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal screening. A preliminary analysis of an 8 year study. Advances in otoacoustic emissions. Vol 1: Fundamentals and clinical application, F Grandori, L Collet, D Kemp, G Solomon, K Schorn, R Thornton. Casa Editrice G. Ste-fanoni-Lecco, Milan 1994; 124–130
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson J, Jacobson C A. Current technology in newborn universal hearing detection. Semin Hear 1996; 17: 125–137
   Google Scholar
• Kei J, McPherson B, Smyth V, Latham S, Loscher J. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in infants: effects of gender, ear asymmetry and activity status. Audiology 1997; 36: 61–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Davis A C, Fortnum H M, Wood C. Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 265–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. 1994 position statement. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 32: 265–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White K R, Culpepper B, Maxon A B, Vohr B R, Mauk G W. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission-based screening in typical nurseries: a response to Jacobson and Jacobson. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 33: 17–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxon A B, White K R, Culpepper B, Vohr B R. Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening programs. J Community Disord 1997; 30: 457–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S. Otoacoustic emission tests in neonatal screening programmes. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1991; 482: 73–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S. The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 30–45
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper N B. Neonatal screening via evoked otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications, M S Robinette, T J Glattke. Thieme, New York-Stuttgart 1997; 233–270
   Google Scholar
• Norton S J, Widen J E. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing infants and children: emerging data and issues. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 121–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uziel A, Piron J P. Evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal newborns and babies admitted to an intensive care baby unit. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1991; 482: 85–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aidan D, Lucek A, El-Bez M, et al. Définition des criteres de normalité d' une oto-émission acoustique provoquée chez le nouveau-né. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1995; 112: 305–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kok M R, Van Zanten G A, Brocaar M P, Wallenburg H CS. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in 1036 ears of healthy newborns. Audiology 1993; 32: 213–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glattke T J, Pafitis I A, Cummiskey C, Herer G R. Identification of hearing loss in children and young adults using measures of transient otoacoustic emission reproducibility. Am J Audiol 1995; 4: 71–86
   Google Scholar
• Slaven A, Thornton A RD. Neonatal otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequence stimuli. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 103–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi S S, Pafitis I A, Herer G R, Zalzal G H, Patel K M. Clinical applications of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in the pediatric population. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 132–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi H, Adelman C, Geal-Dor M, et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns in the first 48 hours after birth. Audiology 1997; 36: 181–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNellis E L, Klen A J. Pass/fail rates for repeated click-evoked otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem response screenings in newborns. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 431–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang S W, Gerber S E, Thornton A RD. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 26: 39–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson J T, Jacobson C A. The effect of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29: 235–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. The evoked cochlear mechanical response of the auditory microstructure in models of the auditory system and related signal processing techniques. Scand Audiol 1979; 9: 35–47
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J P. Recording of the Kemp echo and tinnitus from the ear canal without averaging. J Physiol 1980; 298: 8–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 92–105
   Google Scholar
• Bray P J. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions and the development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument. London University. 1989
   Google Scholar