Role of the Efferent Medial Olivocochlear System in Contralateral Masking and Binaural Interactions: An Electrophysiological Study in Guinea Pigs : Papel del Sistema Olivo-coclear Medial en el Enmascaramiento Contralateral e Interacciones Binaurales: Estudio electrofisiologico en conejillos de Indias

References

• Spoendlin H. The innervation of the cochlear receptor. Basic mechanisms in hearing, A R Moller. Academic, New York 1973; 185–234
   Google Scholar
• Warr W B. Olivocochlear and vestibular efferent neurons of the feline brain stem: their location, morphology and number determined by retrograde axonal transport and acetylcholinesterase histochemistry. J Comp Neurol 1975; 161: 159–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr W B. The olivocochlear bundle: its origin and terminations in the cat. Evoked electrical activity in the auditory nervous system, R F Naunton, C Fernandez. Academic, New York 1978; 43–69
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. J Neurophysiol 1956; 19: 424–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fex J. Crossed cochlear efferents activated by sound through both ears. Acta Physiol Scand 1963; 213(Suppl), 41
   Google Scholar
• Buño W., Jr. Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation. Exp Neurol 1978; 59: 62–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold M L, Kiang NY-S. Effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust SocAm 1970; 48: 950–965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederhold M L. Variations in the effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve fiber responses to tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 1970; 48: 966–977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983; 9: 79–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase T, Liberman M C. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J Neuro-physiol 1993; 70: 2519–2532
   Google Scholar
• Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman M C. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70: 2533–2549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawase T, Takasaka T. The effects of contralateral noise on masked compound action potential in humans. Hear Res 1995; 91: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajan R, Johnstone B M. Electrical stimulation of cochlear efferents of the round window reduces auditory desensitization in guinea pigs. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. Hear Res 1988; 36: 53–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter E R, Liberman M C. Efferent mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 506–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mott J B, Norton S J, Neely S T, Warr W B. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear. Hear Res 1989; 38: 229–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Kemp D T, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251–262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puel J L, Rebillard G. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on distortion product 2f1f2: evidence that medial efferent system is involved. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 1630–1635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Hood L J, Hurley A, Wen H. The First Jerger Lecture: contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivocochlear system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110: 3–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A L, Collet L, Chery-Croze S, Magnan J, Chays A. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Res 1995; 705: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieder P, Nieder I. Antimasking effects of crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation with loud clicks in guinea pigs. Exp Neurol 1970; 28: 179–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman M C. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res 1989; 16: 55–74
   Google Scholar
• Dolan D F, Nuttall A L, Avinash G. Asynchronous neural activity recorded from the round window. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2621–2627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelár J, Lima da Costa D, Erre J P, Avan P, Aran J M. Contralateral suppression of the ensemble background activity of the auditory nerve in awake guinea pigs: effects of gentamicin. Audit Neurosci 1996; 3: 425–33
   Google Scholar
• Lima da Costa D, Chibois A, Erre J P, Blanchet C, Charlet de Sauvage R, Aran J M. Fast, slow, and steady-state effects of contralateral acoustic activation of the medial olivocochlear efferent system in awake guinea pigs: action of gentamicin. J Neurophysiol 1997; 78: 1826–1836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar T S, Liberman M C, Brown M C, Sewell W F. A novel cholinergic “slow effect” of efferent stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 3667–3678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet C, Erostegui C, Sugasawa M, Dulon D. Acetylcholine-induced potassium current of guinea-pig outer hair cells: its dependence on a calcium influx through nicotinic-like receptors. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 2574–2584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitkin L M, Irvine D RF, Webster W R. Central mechanisms of hearing. Handbook of physiology, the nervous system sensory processes, L Darian-Smith. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD 1983; 695–737
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J J. Central masking and neural activity in the cochlear nucleus. Audiology 1971; 10: 48–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boezeman E HJF, Kapteyn T S, Visser S L, Snel A M. Effect of contralateral and ipsilateral masking of acoustic stimulation on the latencies of auditory evoked potentials from cochlea and brain stem. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55: 710–713
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dum N, von Wedel H. Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1984; 63: 636–639
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore D R. Anatomy and physiology of binaural hearing. Audiology 1991; 30: 125–134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A. Binaural interaction in auditory brainstem responses: theoretical and methodological considerations. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 7I: 1031–1033
   Google Scholar
• Mills J H, Dubno J R, He N. Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 3336–3344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith D W, Turner D A, Henson M M. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in “central masking” in non-human primates. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 933–941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman M C. Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve responses. Hear Res 1990; 49: 209–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh E J, McGee J A, McFadden S L, Liberman M C. Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 3859–3869
   Google Scholar
• Williams E A, Brookes G B, Prasher D K. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions following vestibular neurectomy. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 197–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A L, Collet L, Chery-Croze S, Magnan J, Chays A. Evidence of a medial olivocochlear involvement in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in humans. Brain Res 1995; 705: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf B, Magnan J, Collet L, Ulmer E, Chays A. On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing. A case study. Hear Res 1994; 75: 11–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf B, Magnan J, Chays A. On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies. Hear Res 1997; 103: 101–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A L, Garnier S, Micheyl C, Lina G, Chays A, Chery-Croze S. Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility. NeuroReport 1997; 8: 1779–1783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar T S, Brown M C, Sewell W F. Unique postsynaptic signaling at the hair cell efferent synapse permits calcium to evoke changes on two time scales. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 428–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D W, Erre J P, Aran J M. Rapid, reversible elimination of medial olivocochlear efferent function following single injections of gentamicin in the guinea pig. Brain Res 1994; 652: 243–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aran J M, Erre J P, Avan P. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: effects of gentamicin. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 267–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan P, Erre J P, Lima da Costa D, Aran J M, Popelar J. The efferent-mediated suppression of otoacoustic emissions in awake guinea pigs and its reversible blockage by gentamicin. Exp Brain Res 1996; 109: 9–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida N, Liberman M C, Brown M C, Sewell W F. Gentamicin blocks both fast and slow effects of olivocochlear activation in anesthetized guinea pigs. J Neurophysiol 1999; 82: 3168–3174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aran J M, Erre J P, Lima da Costa D, Debbarh I, Dulon D. Acute and chronic effects of aminoglycosides on cochlear hair cells. Ototoxicity, basic science and clinical applications, D Henderson, R J Salvi, A Quaranta, S L McFadden, R F Burkard, 1999; 884: 60–68, Ann N Y Acad Sci;
   Google Scholar
• Tran B, Huy P, Manuel C, Meulemans A. Kinetics of aminoglycoside antibiotics in perilymph and endolymph in animals. Aminoglycoside ototoxicity, S A Lerner, G J Matz, J EJ Hawkins. Little, Brown, Boston 1981; 81–98
   Google Scholar
• Aran J M, Erre J P. Long term recording of the cochleo-neural potentials in the guinea pig. Auditory investigations, H A Beagley. scientific and technological basis. Oxford Medical Engineering Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979; 233–261
   Google Scholar
• Dum N, Schmidt U, von Wedel H. Scalp distribution of the auditory evoked brainstem potentials in the guinea pig during monaural and binaural stimulation. Hear Res 1981; 5: 271–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttermann A E, Reid K, Maze M. Are cholinergic pathways involved in the anesthetic response to alpha2 agonists?. Toxicol Lett 1998; 101: 17–22, 100-
   Google Scholar
• Elgoyhen A, Johnson D S, Boulter J, Vetter D E, Heinemann S. Alpha 9: an acetylcholine receptor with novel pharmacological properties expressed in rat cochlear hair cells. Cell 1994; 18: 705–715
   Google Scholar
• Lima da Costa D, Erre J P, Charlet de Sauvage R, Popelár J, Aran J M. Bioelectrical cochlear noise and its contralateral suppression: relation to background VHIth nerve activity and effects of sedation and anesthesia. Exp Brain Res 1997; 117: 259–269
   Google Scholar
• Gardi J N, Berlin C I. Binaural interaction components: their possible origins in guinea pig auditory brainstem response. Arch Otolaryngol 1981; 107: 164–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada S-I, Starr A. Anatomical bases of binaural interaction in auditory brain-stem responses from guinea pig. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 72: 535–544
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly J B, Li L. Two sources of inhibition affecting binaural evoked responses in the rat's inferior colliculus: the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus and the superior olivary complex. Hear Res 1997; 104: 112–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenhamer H, Holmkvist C. Will contralateral white noise interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response?. Scand Audiol 1983; 12: 11–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Binaural interaction in auditory brain-stem responses: effects of masking. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 56–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guinan J J, Jr, Gifford M L. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF. Hear Res 1988; 37: 29–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren EH I, II, Liberman M C. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res 1989; 37: 89–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren E H, III, Liberman M C. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables. Hear Res 1989; 37: 105–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden G, Nilson G, Anderson H. Masking in clinical audiology. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1959; 50: 125–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirks D D, Norris J C. Shifts in auditory thresholds produced by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers at low-intensity levels. J Acoust Soc Am 1966; 40: 12–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland E A, Viemeister N F. An attempt to find psychophysical evidence for efferent action in humans. Abst Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1995; 18: 173
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein M H, Kiang NY-S. Synchrony of neural activity in electric responses evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1958; 30: 107–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazals Y, Huang Z W. Average spectrum of cochlear activity: a possible synchronized firing, its olivo-cochlear feedback and alterations under anesthesia. Hear Res 1996; 101: 81–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popelar J, Erre J P, Syka J, Aran J M. Compared measures of contralateral suppression of cochlear activity in guinea pigs, Hear Res (in press)
   Google Scholar