26
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Digital Subtraction Method for Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Recording with Ipsilateral Noise Suppression: An Application to Stimulus Artifact Reduction: Método de substracción digital para el registro de emisiones otoacústicas evocada por transientes con supresión ipsilateral de ruido: Una aplicación para la reducción de artefactos en el estimulo

, &
Pages 55-62 | Received 23 May 2000, Accepted 09 Jan 2001, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Kemp D T, Chum R. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 1980; 2: 213–232
  • Wilson J P. Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear Res 1980; 2: 233–252
  • Collet L, Kemp D, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251–262
  • Berlin C I, Hood L J, Wen H, Szabo P, Cecola R P. Contralateral suppression of nonlinear click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 1–11
  • Tavarkiladze G, Frolenkov G, Artamasov S. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: role of the medial olivocochlear system. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 213–218
  • Kevanishvili Z, Gobsch H, Gvelesiani T, Gamgebeli Z. Evoked otoacoustic emission: behaviour under the forward masking paradigm. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol RelatSpec 1992; 54: 229–234
  • Gobsch H, Kevanishvili Z, Gamgebeli Z, Gvelesiani T. Behaviour of delayed evoked otoacoustic emission under forward masking paradigm. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 143–148
  • Tavarkiladze G A, Frolenkov G I, Kruglov A V, Artamasov S V. Advances in otoacoustic emissions III. Suppression effects of otoacoustic emissions. Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission. 1993; 9–22
  • Berlin C I, Hood L J, Hurley A E, Wen H, Kemp D T. Binaural noise suppresses linear click evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear Res 1995; 87: 96–103
  • Kemp D, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography-practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; 25: 71–94, Suppl
  • Grandori F, Ravazzani P. Non-linearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived non-linear technique. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 97–102
  • Liberman C. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise. J Neurophysiol 1988; 60: 1779–1798
  • Kruglov A V, Artamasov S V, Frolenkov G I, Tavarkilatze G A. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission with unexpectedly short latency. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 174–178
  • Burkard R, Hecox K. The effects of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 1204–1213
  • Burkard R, Hecox K. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response: II. Frequency specificity. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 1214–1223
  • Owen G A, Burkard R. Ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural masking effects on the human brainstem auditory evoked responses to click stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1760–1767

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.