Brazilian Portuguese Speech Material and its Application in Occupational Audiology: Material vocal en portugues brasileno y su aplicacion en Audiologia Ocupacional

References

• ACOM. American College of Occupational Medicine Noise and Hearing Conservation Committee. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Med 1989; 31: 996
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Da Costa E A. Audiometria tonal e testes de reconhecimento da fala; estudo comparativo para aplicação em audiologia ocupacional. Acta AWHO 1992; 11: 137–142
   Google Scholar
• Da Costa E A. Estudo da correlação entre a audiometria tonal e o reconhecimento de monossílabos mascarados por fala competitiva nas perdas auditivas induzidas pelo ruido. Acta AWHO 1995; 14: 27–35
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Ludvigsen C, Lyregaard P E. Dantale: a new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol 1989; 18: 169–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics–Audiometric test methods–Part 3: Speech audiometry. ISO 8253-3. ISO, Geneva 1993
   Google Scholar
• Dean A G, Dean J A, Burton A H, Dicker R C. Epi Info, Version 6: a word processing, database, and statistics program for epidemiology on microcomputers. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 1990
   Google Scholar
• Daniel W W. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Russo I CP, Santos T MM. A prática da audiologia clínica, 4th edn. Cortez, São Paulo 1993
   Google Scholar
• Mangabeira-Albernaz P L. Logoaudiometria. Processamento auditivo central; manual de avaliacao, L D Pereira, E Schochat. Lovise, Sao Paulo 1997; 39–42
   Google Scholar
• Mendel L L, Danhauer J L. Audiologic evaluation and management and speech perception assessment. Singular PG, San Diego 1997; 275
   Google Scholar
• Wilson R H. Speech and other materials on compact disk for use in auditory assessment. Audiologic evaluation and management and speech perception assessment, L L Mendel, J L Danhauer. Singular PG, San Diego 1997; 169–199
   Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G F, Bosman A. Choosing speech materials to assess hearing impairment. Noise induced hearing loss, A L Dancer, D Henderson, R J Salvi, R P Hamernik. Mosby Year Book, St Louis 1992; 282–292
   Google Scholar
• Sá G. Analise fonetica da lingua portuguesa falada no Brasil e a sua aplicação na logoaudiometria. Rev Bras Med 1952; 9: 482–490
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcaim A, Solewicz J A, Moraes J A. Da Costa Freqüěncia de ocorrencia dos fones e listas de frases foneticamente balanceadas no portuguěs falado no Rio de Janeiro. Rev Soc Bras Telecom 1992; 7: 23–41
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson L. Reliable clinical determination of speech recognition scores using Swedish PB words in speech-weighted noise. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 217–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser G. Normative data in quiet and in noise for “DANTALE”–a Danish speech material. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 231–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R, Tillman T W. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 91: 273–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper J R, Cutts B P. Speech discrimination in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 332–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith R W, Talis H P. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 1972; 11: 177–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aniansson G. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every day listening situations. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 320, Suppl:19 29
   Google Scholar
• Cohen R L, Keith R W. Use of low-pass noise in word-recognition testing. J Speech Hear Res 1976; 19: 48–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz D M, Surr R K. Three experiments on the California Consonant Test. J Speech Hear Dis 1979; 44: 61–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quist-Hanssen S, Thorud E, Aasand G. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1979; 360: 90–95, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Dirks D D, Morgan D E, Dubno J R. A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Dis 1982; 47: 114–123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R C. Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 Test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Speech Hear Dis 1989; 54: 20–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suter A H. Speech recognition in noise by individuals with mild hearing impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 887–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen E, Salmivalli A, Suonpaa J. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing. Scand Audiol 1990; 19: 31–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needleman A R, Crandell C C. Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 414–424
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Causey G D, Hermanson C L, Hood L J, Bowling L S. A comparative evaluation of the Maryland NU6 Auditory Test. J Speech Hear Dis 1983; 48: 62–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Causey G D, Hood L J, Hermanson C L, Bowling L S. The Maryland CNC Test: normative studies. Audiology 1984; 23: 552–568
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen SØ. Evaluation of the list of numerals in the Danish speech audiometry material Dantale. Scand Audiol 1995; 24: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger S, Dryselius H. Speech recognition in noise: temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990; 469: 30–37, Suppl
   Google Scholar