37
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Tone Decay at Threshold with Auditory Electrical Stimulation in Digisonic Cochlear Implantees:Fatiga del tono a nivel umbral al realizar estimulación eléctrica auditiva con implantes cocleares Digisonic

, &
Pages 265-271 | Received 15 Feb 2001, Accepted 26 Jun 2001, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Jerger J F. Auditory adaptation. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 357–363
  • Brimacombe J A, Eisenberg L S. Tone decay in subjects with the single-channel cochlear implant. Audiology 1984; 23: 321–332
  • Shannon R V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 1983; 11: 157–189
  • van der Honert C, Stypulkowski P H. Characterisation of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and human. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109–126
  • Scharf B. Loudness adaptation. Hearing Research and Theory, J V Tobias, E D Schubert. Academic Press, New York 1983; vol. 2: 1–56
  • Miskiewicz A, Hellman R, Scharf B. Loudness adaptation at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 1281–1286
  • Hellman R, Miskiewicz A, Scharf B. Loudness adaptation and excitation patterns: effects of frequency and level. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 2176–2185
  • Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. New level of speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–238
  • Miller J M, Duckert L G, Malone M A, Pfingst B E. Cochlear prothese: stimulation-induced damage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 599–609
  • Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Effects of high electrical stimulus intensities on the auditory nerve using brain stem response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96(suppl 128)50–52
  • Tykocinski M, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. Hear Res 1995; 88: 124–142
  • Tykocinski M, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli. Hear Res 1997; 112: 147–157
  • Gantz B J, Brown C J, Abbas P J. Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 137–144
  • Beliaeff M, Dubus P, Leveau J-M, Repetto J-C, Vincent P. Sound signal processing and stimulation coding of the Digisonic DX10 15-channel cochlear implant. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J Hochmair-Desoyer, E S Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 198–203
  • Green D S, Huerta L. Tests of retro-cochlear function, J Katz, 1994; 176–180, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th edn, Baltimore
  • Wable J, van den Abbeele T, Gallégo S, Frachet B. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 743–751
  • Lafon J-C. Le Test Phonétique et la Mesure de ľAudition. Dunod, Paris 1964

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.