50
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of the Acoustical Dynamic Range on Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants:Efectos en el rango dinámico del reconocimiento del habla con implantes cocleares

&
Pages 272-281 | Received 27 Mar 2001, Accepted 01 Jun 2001, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Boothroyd A, Erickson F N, Medwetsky L. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 432–442
  • Eddington D K, Dobelle W H, Brackmann D E, Mladejowsky M G, Parkin J L. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 87(suppl 53)5–39
  • Dorman M F, Smith L, Parkin J L. Loudness balance between acoustic and electric stimulation by a patient with a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 290–292
  • Zeng F-G, Shannon R V. Loudness balance between electric and acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1992; 60: 231–235
  • Zeng F-G, Shannon R V. Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system. Science 1994; 264: 564–566
  • Fu Q J, Shannon R V. Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 2570–2577
  • Zeng F-G, Galvin J J, Zhang C. Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. Neuro Report 1999; 9: 1845–1848
  • Loizou P C, Poroy O. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 790–802
  • Boëx C. Codage des sons pour les implants cochléaires. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, Doctoral Dissertation, Université 1995
  • Boëx C, Eddington D K, Noel V, Rabinowitz W M, Tierney J, Whearty W E. Restoration of normal loudness growth for CIS sound coding strategy. Abstracts of 1997 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses. House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, 1997: 26
  • Drullman R. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 585–592
  • Delhorne L, Eddington D K, Garcia N, Rabinowitz W M, Tierney J, Whearty M E. Second Quarterly Progress Report, Speech processors for auditory prostheses, NIH contract N01-DC-6-2100. 1996
  • Cosendai G, Pelizzone M. Effects of the selection of the acoustical dynamic range of the mapping function on speech reception. Abstracts of 1997 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses. House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, 1997: 87
  • Fu Q J, Shannon R V. Effect of acoustic dynamic range on phoneme recognition in quiet and noise by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: L65–L70
  • Montandon P, Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Rohr A. Geneva experience with the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. ORL 1992; 54: 314–316
  • François J, Tinembart J, Bessat C, Leone P, Rossman F, Pelizzone M. Implants cochléaires: Un processeur portable pour le développement de lalgorithme CIS. Actes de la conférence DSP 94. House Ear Institute, Paris Los Angeles 1994
  • Boëx-Spano C, Pelizzone M, Montandon P. speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 61–67
  • Pelizzone M, Cosendai G, Tinembart J. Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for ineraid implanted subjects. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 228–237
  • Cosendai G. Développement et évaluation de stratégies de codage pour laudition artificielle par stimulation électrique du nerf auditif. 2001, Doctoral Dissertation no. 2363, Federal Politech-nical School, Lausanne
  • Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–238
  • De Gennaro S V. An analytic study of syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners. Doctoral Dissertation no. 2363, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1982
  • Pelizzone M, Boëx-Spano C, Montandon P. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients. ORL 1993; 55: 341–346
  • Dorman M F, Smith L, Smith M, Parkin J. The coding of vowel identity by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 3428–3431
  • Shannon R V, Fu Q J, Wang X, Galvin J, Wygonski J. Critical cues for auditory pattern recognition in speech: implications for cochlear implant speech processor design. Physiological and psychological bases of auditory function: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Hearing, A JM Houtsma, A Kohlrausch, V F Prijs, R Schoonhoven. Shaker Publishing BV, Maastricht 2001; 500–8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.