Children's Perception of Temporally Distorted Sentential Approximations of Varying Length

References

• Aaronson D. Temporal factors in perception and short-term memory. Psychol. Bull. 1967; 67: 130–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson D., Markowitz N., Shapiro H. Perception and immediate recall of normal and 'compressed' auditory sequences. Perception Psychophys. 1971; 9: 338–344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson D., Sternberg S. Effects of presentation rate and signal-to-noise ratio on immediate recall. Paper presented to East. Psychol. Ass., Philadelphia. 1964
   Google Scholar
• Beasley D., Beasley D. Auditory reassembly abilities of black and white first- and third-grade children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1973; 16: 213–221
   Google Scholar
• Beasley D., Forman B., Rintelmann W. Perception of time-compressed CNC monosyllables. J. audit. Res. 1972a; 12: 71–75
   Google Scholar
• Beasley D., Manning W., Shriner T., Beasley D. Auditory assembly of CVCs by children with normal and defective articulation. J. Commun. Dis. 1974; 7: 127–133
   Google Scholar
• Beasley D., Shriner T. Auditory analysis of temporally distorted sentential approximations. Audiology 1973; 12: 262–271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beasley D., Schwimmer S., Rintelmann W. Intelligibility of time-compressed CNC monosyllables. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1972b; 15: 340–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berry M. Language disorders of children: The bases and diagnosis. Appleton Century Crofts, New York 1969
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E. Distorted speech tests; in Graham Sensorineural hearing process and disorders. Little, Brown, Boston 1967
   Google Scholar
• Bocca E., Calearo C. Central hearing processes; in Jerger Modern developments in Audiology. Academic Press, New York 1963
   Google Scholar
• Fodor J., Bever T., Garrett M. The development of psychological models for speech recognition. Hanscom Field, Bedford 1969
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. Combinations of distorted speech: twenty-five percent safety factor by multiple cueing. Archs Otolar. 1960; 72: 227–232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodgson W. Filtered speech tests; in Katz Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1972
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Audiological manifestations of lesions in the auditory nervous system. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 417–425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J., Speaks C., Trammel J. A new approach to speech audiometry. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1968; 33: 318–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz J. Auditory perception training for children with learning disabilities. Menorah med. J. 1971; 2: 18–29
   Google Scholar
• Kirk S., McCarthy J., Kirk W. Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities. University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1968
   Google Scholar
• Konkle D., Beasley D., Bess F. A study of time-compressed speech with an elderly population. Paper presented to Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Las Vegas. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Kurdziel S., Noffsinger D. Performance of cortical lesion patients on 40% and 60% time-compressed speech materials. Paper presented to Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Detroit. 1973
   Google Scholar
• Kurdziel S., Rintelmann W., Beasley D. Performance of noise-induced hearing-impaired listeners on time-compressed CNC monosyllables. 1975, submitted for publication
   Google Scholar
• Maki J., Beasley D., Orchik D. Children's perception of time-compressed speech using two measures of speech discrimination. Paper presented to Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Las Vegas. 1974
   Google Scholar
• McKee P. Basal vocabulary; from On we go, Teacher's guide. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston 1966
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. Some psychological studies of grammar. Am. Psychol. 1962; 17: 748–762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. Some preliminaries to psycholinguistics. Am. Psychol. 1965; 20: 15–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller G. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 1956; 63: 81–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orchik D., Oelschlager M. Time-compressed speech discrimination in children: its relationship to articulation ability. Paper presented to Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Las Vegas. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Pantalos J., Schuckers G., Hipskind N. Sentence length-duration relationships in an auditory assembly task. Paper presented to Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., San Francisco. 1972
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I. Language as behavior; in MacMilliker and Danley Brain mechanisms underlying speech and language. Grune & Stratton, New York 1967
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I., Rubenstein H., Decker L. Analysis of incorrect responses to an un-known message set. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1960; 32: 454–458
   Google Scholar
• Pollack I., Pickett J. Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: auditory versus structural context. J. verbal. Learn. verbal Behav. 1964; 3: 79–84
   Google Scholar
• Schuckers G., Shriner T., Daniloff R. Auditory assembly of segmented sentences by children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1973; 16
   Google Scholar
• Schuckers G., Shriner T., Daniloff R. Auditory assembly of segmented sentences by children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1973; 16: 116–127
   Google Scholar
• Shriner T., Daniloff R. Reassembly of segmented CVC syllables by children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 537–547
   Google Scholar
• Smith A., Beasley D. Short-term memory and imitation: effects of sentence length, sentence type, word type, stress, and grade. Paper presented to Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Detroit. 1973
   Google Scholar
• Speaks C., Jerger J. Method for measurement for speech identification. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1965; 8: 185–194
   Google Scholar
• Speaks C., Jerger J., Jerger S. Performance-intensity characteristics of synthetic sentences. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1966; 9: 305–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster J., Davis H., Ward W. Everyday speech intelligibility. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1965; 38: 668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar