Use of Frequency-Shifted/Time-Compressed Speech with Hearing-Impaired Children

References

• Beasley D.S., Forman B., Rintelmann W.F. Perception of time-compressed CNC monosyllables by normal listeners. J. audiol. Res. 1972a; 12: 71–75
   Google Scholar
• Beasley D.S., Moulton R.M., Nikam S., Riggs D., Freeman B., Konkle D.F. A method for time compressing/expanding speech: some technical and comparative considerations. Michigan State University, East Lansing 1974
   Google Scholar
• Beasley D.S., Schwimmer S., Rintelmann W.F. Intelligibility of time-compressed CNC monosyllables. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1972b; 15: 340–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beasley D.S., Shriner T. Auditory analysis of temporally distorted sentential approximations. Audiology 1973; 12: 262–271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett D.N., Byers V.W. Increased intelligibility in the hypacusic by slow-play frequency transposition. J. audiol. Res. 1967; 7: 107–119
   Google Scholar
• Bogert B.P. The vobanc a two-to-one speech band-width reduction system. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1956; 28: 399–404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corliss E., Burnett E., Kobal M., Bassin M. The relative importance of frequency distortion and changes in time constants in the intelligibility of speech. IEEE Trans. Audio-Electron. 1968; AU-15: 36–39
   Google Scholar
• Daniloff R.G., Shriner T.S., Zemlin W.R. The intelligibility of vowels altered in duration and frequency. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1968; 44: 700–707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks G., Everitt W.L., Jaeger R.P. Methods for time or frequency compression-expansion of speech. Trans. IRE-PGA 1954; AU-2: 7–12
   Google Scholar
• Foulke E. Comparison of comprehension of two forms of compressed speech. J. except. Child 1966; 33: 169–173
   Google Scholar
• Garvey W.D. The intelligibility of speeded speech. J. exp. Psychol. 1953; 45: 102–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gold B. Techniques for speech bandwidth compression, using combinations of channel vocoders and formant vocoders. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1965; 38: 2–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold B., Radar C. The channel vocoder. IEEE Trans. Audio-Electron. 1967; AU-15: 148–160
   Google Scholar
• Golden R.M. Digital computer simulation of a sampled-data voice-excited vocoder. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1963; 35: 1358–1367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman N., Nelson J. An instrument that creates some artificial speech spectra for the severely hard of hearing. Am. Ann. Deaf 1968; 113: 295–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holleywell N., Harvey R. Helium speech. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1964; 36: 210–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson B. The use of the transposer for the management of the deaf child. Int. Audiol. 1966; 5: 362–372
   Google Scholar
• Johansson B., Wedenberg E. Speech compression techniques applied to aids for the hard of hearing. 1. Hearing aids. STL-QPSR 1960; 1: 25–26
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K. Speech bandwidth compression through spectrum selection. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1960; 32: 547–556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzrock G.H. The effects of time and frequency distortion upon word intelligibility. PhD Diss. Champaign. Speech Monogr. 1957; 24: 94, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Lee F. Varispeech I: instruction manual. Lexicon, Waltham 1972
   Google Scholar
• Ling D., Druz W.S. Transposition of high-frequency sounds by partial vocoding of the speech spectrum: its use by deaf children. J. audiol. Res. 1967; 7: 133–144
   Google Scholar
• Ling D. Three experiments on frequency transposition. Am. Ann. Deaf 1968; 113: 283–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling D. Auditory discrimination of speech transposed by a sample-and-hold process; in Fant International symposium on speech communication ability and profound deafness. Alexander Graham Bell Ass. for the Deaf, Washington 1972; 323–333
   Google Scholar
• Ling D., Doehring D.G. Learning limits of deaf children for coded speech. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1969; 12: 83–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maki J., Beasley D.S. Children's perception of time-compressed speech using two measures of speech discrimination. Proc. Meet. Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Las Vegas 1974
   Google Scholar
• McLean D. Analysis of speech in a helium-oxygen mixture under pressure. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1966; 40: 625–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson G.E., Barney H.L. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1952; 24: 175–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimonow L. L'application de la parole synthétique dans la correction auditive. Acustica 1962; 12: 285–290, English translation. J. aud. Res. 3 73–82 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond T.H., Proud G.O. Audiofrequency conversion. Archs Oto-lar. 1962; 76: 436–446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross M., Lerman J. A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 44–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeder M.R. Vocoders: analysis and synthesis of speech. Proc. IEEE 1966; AU-54: 720–734
   Google Scholar
• Shriner T.S., Beasley D.S., Zemlin W.R. Effects of frequency divided speech signals on identification accuracy and reaction time measures. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1969; 12: 413–421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takefuta Y., Swigart E. Intelligibility of speech signals spectrally compressed by a sampling-synthesizing technique. IEEE Trans. Audio-Electron. 1968; AU-15: 271–274
   Google Scholar
• Vilbig F., Haase K.H. Some systems of speech band compression. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1956; 28: 573–577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voiers R. The present state of digital vocoding technique: a diagnostic evaluation. IEEE Trans. Audio-Electron. 1968; AU-15: 275–279
   Google Scholar
• Williams C., Hecker M. Relation between intelligibility scores for test methods and three types of speech distortion. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1968; 44: 1002–1006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemlin W.R. The use of bandwidth and time compression for the hard of hearing handicapped; in Foulke Proceedings of the Louisville conference on time compressed speech. University of Louisville Press, Louisville 1967; 95–97
   Google Scholar