Auditory Nerve and Brain Stem Volume-Conducted Potentials Evoked by Pure-Tone Pips in the CBA/J Laboratory Mouse

References

• Aran J.-M., Le Bert G. Les résponses nerveuses cochléaires chez l'homme, image du fonctionnement de l'oreille et nouveau test d'audiométrie objective. Revue Lar. Otol. Rhinol., Bord. 1968; 89: 361–378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Békésy G. Experiments in hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York 1960
   Google Scholar
• Birch L.M., Warfield D., Ruben R.J., Mikaelian D.O. Behavioral measurements of pure tone thresholds in normal CBA-J mice. J. audit. Res. 1968; 8: 45–968
   Google Scholar
• Brama I., Sohmer H. Auditory nerve and brain stem responses to sound stimuli at various frequencies. Audiology 1977; 16: 402–408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown A.M. High frequency responsiveness in rodents at the level of the inferior colliculus. Nature new Biol. 1971; 232: 223–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown A.M. High levels of responsiveness from the inferior colliculus of rodents at ultrasonic frequencies. J. comp. Physiol. 1973; 83: 393–406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald J.S., Huang C.-M. Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science 1975; 189: 382–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats C.A. Evaluation of ‘click-pips’ as impulsive yet frequency-specific stimuli for possible use in electrocochleography: a preliminary report. Ruben, Elberling and Salomon, Electrocochleography. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976; 387–406
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Hirsh S.K. The audiometric utility of brain stem responses to low frequency sounds. Audiology 1976; 15: 181–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H., Hirsh S.K. Brainstem electric response audiometry (BSERA). Acta oto- lar. 1977; 83: 136–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J. Electrophysiological study of the normal and pathological human cochlea. II. Neural responses. Revue Lar. Otol. Rhinol. 1976a; 97(suppl.)497–506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eggermont J.J. Analysis of compound action potential responses to tone bursts in the human and guinea pig cochlea. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1976b; 60: 1132–1139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J. Stimulus-response relations for promontory-recorded compound-action potentials in normal and recruiting ears. Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System. University of Chicago. 1977
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J., Spoor A., Odenthal D.W. Frequency specificity of toneburst electrocochleography; in Ruben. Elberling and Salomon, Electrocochleography. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976; 215–246
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C. Simulation of cochlear action potentials recorded from the ear canal in man; in Ruben, Elberling and Salomon, Electrocochleography. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976a; 151–168
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C. High frequency evoked action potentials recorded from the ear canal in man. Scand. Audiol. 1976b; 5: 157–164
   Google Scholar
• Henry K.R. Auditory brainstem volume conducted responses: originals in the laboratory mouse. 1978, In preparation
   Google Scholar
• Henry K.R., Haythorn M.M. Age and stimulus intensity effects on the volume-conducted auditory brainstem potentials in the laboratory mouse. Devi Psychobiol. 1978; 11: 161–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C.-M., Buchwald J.S. “Interpretation of the vertex short-latency acoustic response a study of single neurons in the brainstem. Brain Res. 1977; 137: 291–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C.-M., Buchwald J.S. Factors that affect the amplitudes and latencies of the vertex short latency acoustic responses in the cat. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1978, (in press,)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jewett D.L. Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol 1970; 28: 609–618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jewett D.L., Romano M.N. Neonatal development of auditory system potentials averaged from the scalp of rat and cat. Brain Res. 1972; 36: 101–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett D.L., Williston J.S. Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971; 94: 681–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev A., Sohmer H. Sources of averaged neural responses recorded in animal and human subjects during cochlear audiometry (electro-cochleogram). Arch. klin. exp. Ohr.-Nas.-KehlkHeilk. 1972; 201: 79–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikaelian D., Alford B.R., Ruben R.J. Cochlear potentials and VIII nerve action potentials in normal and genetically deaf mice. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1965; 74: 146–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naunton R.F., Zerlin S. Human whole-nerve response to clicks of various frequency. Audiology 1976; 15: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenthal D.W., Eggermont J.J. Diagnosis by electrocochleography. Revue Lar., Bord. 1974; 95: 481–488
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A., Krusz H.I., Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1974; 36: 179–190
   Google Scholar
• Plantz R.G., Williston J.S., Jewett D.L. Spatio-temporal distribution of auditory-evoked far field potentials in rat and cat. Brain Res. 1974; 68: 55–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor C. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hereditary sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1977; 87(suppl. 7)1–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose J.E., Greenwood D.D., Goldberg J.M., Hind J.E. Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Tonotopic organization, relation of spike counts to tone intensity, and firing patterns of single elements. J. Neurophysiol. 1963; 26: 293–320
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblith W.A. Electrical responses from the auditory nervous system. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1954; 63: 839–860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher A.E. The embryonic and postnatal development of the inner ear of the mouse. Acta oto-lar. 1971, suppl. 285: 1–29
   Google Scholar
• Henry Sidman R.L., Green M.C., Appel S.H. Catalog of the neurological mutants of the mouse. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1965
   Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1967; 76: 427–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear and cortical audiometry. Israel J. med. Scis 1970; 6: 219–223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T., Hirai Y., Horiuchi K. Auditory brain stem responses to pure tone stimuli. Scand. Audiol. 1977; 6: 51–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terkildsen K., Osterhammel P., Huis in't Veld F. Far field electrocochleography. Frequency specificity of the response. Scand. Audiol. 1975a; 4: 167–172
   Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K., Osterhammel P., Huis in't Veld F. Far-field electrocochleography. Adaptation. Scand. Audiol. 1975b; 4: 215–220
   Google Scholar
• Webster D.B., Webster M. Kangaroo rat thresholds before and after middle ear reduction. Brain Behav. Evol. 1972; 5: 41–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada O., Yamane H., Kodera K. Simultaneous recordings of the brain stem response and the frequency following response to low frequency tone. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1977; 43: 362–370
   Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Diagnostic significance of the electrocochleogram in clinical audiometry. Audiology 1973; 12: 504–539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T., Suzuki T. Nonsurgical recording of auditory nerve action potentials in man. Laryngoscope, St. Louis 1967; 77: 76–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar