References
- Berlin C.I., Cullen J.K., Jr. in Seqalowitz and Gruber, Language development and neurological theory: acoustic problems in dichotic listening tasks. Academic Press, New York 1977; 75
- Berlin C.I., Lowe-Bell S.S., Cullen J.K., Jr., Thompson C.L., Loovis C.F. Dichotic speech perception: an interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effects. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1973; 53: 699–709
- Carhart R., Jerger J. Preferred method of clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1959; 24: 330–345
- Cullen J.K., Thompson C.L., Hughes L.F., Berlin C.I., Sampson D.S. The effects of varied acoustic parameters on performance in dichotic speech perception tasks. Brain Lang. 1974; 1: 307–332
- Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D., Lindsay P.H. Comments on selective attention: perception or response? Q. Jl exp. Psychol. 1967; 19: 362–367
- Gerber S.E., Goldman P. Ear preference for dichotically presented verbal stimuli as a function of report strategies. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1971; 49: 1163–1168
- Harshman R., Krashen S. An ‘unbiased’ procedure for comparing degree of lateralization of dichotically presented stimuli. 83rd Meet. Acoust. Soc. America. 1972
- Henoch M.A., Allen D.V. The effects of meaningfulness and phonetic feature differences on a dichotic speech perceptive task. Meet. Am. Speech and Hearing Ass., Houston, 1976
- Hoops R.A. Speech science: acoustics in speech. Thomas, Springfield 1969
- Johnson L.K., Ryan W.J. Test-re-test performance of males and females on a verbal dichotic listening task. 89th Meet. Acoust. Soc. Am., Austin, 1975
- Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can. J. Psychol. 1961a; 15: 166–171
- Kimura D. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can. J. Psychol. 1961b; 15: 156–165
- Kimura D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Q. Jl exp. Psychol. 1964; 16: 355–358
- Knox C., Kimura D. Cerebral processing of nonverbal sounds in boys and girls. Neuropsychologia 1970; 8: 227–237
- Ling A.H. Dichotic listening in hearig-impaired children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1971; 14: 793–803
- Millay K., Roeser R.J., Godfrey J.J. Reliability of performance for dichotic listening using two response modes. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1977; 20: 510–518
- Papcum G., Krashen S., Terbeek R.R., Harshman R. Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language and/or something else?. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974; 55: 319–327
- Porter R.J., Jr., Troendle R., Berlin C.I. Effects of practice on the perception of dichotically presented stop-consonant-vowel syllables. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1976; 59: 679–682
- Roeser R.J., Johns D.F., Price L.L. Effects of intensity on dichotically presented digits. J. audit. Res. 1972; 12: 184–186
- Roeser R.J., Johns D.F., Price L.L. Dichotic listening in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. J. Am. audiol. Soc. 1976; 2: 19–25
- Ryan W.J., McNeil M. Listener reliability for a dichotic task. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974; 56: 1922–1923
- Shankweiler D. Effects of temporal lobe damage on perception of dichotically presented melodies. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 1966; 62: 115–119
- Speaks C., Bisonette L.J. Interaural-intensive differences and dichotic listening. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1975; 58: 893–898
- Studdert-Kennedy M., Shankweiler D. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1970; 48: 579–594
- Thompson G. A modified SISI technique for selected cases with suspected acoustic neurionoma. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1963; 28: 299–302
- Tillman T., Carhart R. An expected test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. 1966, Tech. Rep. SAM-TR-66–55, Brooks Air Force Base
- Triesman A.M. Slective attention in man. Br. Med. J. 1964; 20: 12–26
- Triesman A.M. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol. Rev. 1969; 26: 282–299
- Wilson R.H., Dirks D.D., Carterette E.C. Effects of ear preference and order bias on the perception of verbal materials. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 509–522