Quantifying Auditory Handicap: A New Approach

References

• Aniansson G. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in everyday listening situations. Acta oto-lar. 1974, suppl. 320
   Google Scholar
• Atherley G., Noble W. Clinical picture of occupational hearing loss obtained with the hearing measurement scale. Robinson, Occupational hearing loss. Academic Press, London 1971; 193–206
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld V., Bergman M., Millner E. Speech discrimination in an aging population. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1969; 12: 210–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherry C. On human communication: a review, a survey and a criticism, 2nd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge 1966
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Guide for the classification and evaluation of hearing handicap in relation to the international audiometric zero. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthal. Oto-lar. 1965; 69: 740–751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis H. A historical introduction. Robinson, Occupational hearing loss. Academic Press, London 1971; 7–12
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Some comments on ‘Impairment to hearing from exposure to noise’ by Kryter K. D. Jacoust. Soc. Am. 1973; 53: 1237–1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Silverman S. Hearing and deafness, rev. ed. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1960
   Google Scholar
• Dirks D., Carhart R. A survey of reactions from users of binaural and monaural hearing aids. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1962; 27: 311–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egan J. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 955–991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewertsen H., Birk-Nielsen H. Social hearing handicap index. Audiology 1973; 12: 180–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Speech and hearing. Van Nostrand, New York 1929
   Google Scholar
• Fry D. Word and sentence tests for use in speech audiometry. Lancet 1961; 5614: 197–199
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. Pure tone acuity and the intelligibility of everyday speech. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1965; 37: 824–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High W., Fairbanks G., Glorig A. Scale for self-assessment of hearing handicap. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1964; 29: 215–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes E., Johnson R., Arthur R. Measurement of social hearing: the articulation function. Report to the Committee on Research. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology September, 1974
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Hayes D. Hearing aid evaluation. Clinical experience with a new philosophy. Archs. Otolar. 1976; 102: 214–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Hayes D. Diagnostic speech audiometry. Archs Otolar 1977; 103: 216–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Speaks C., Trammell J. A new approach to speech audiometry. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1968; 33: 318–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kell R., Pearson J., Acton W., Taylor W. Social effects of hearing loss due to weaving noise; in Robinson, Occupational hearing loss. Academic Press, London 1971; 179–206
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K. Hearing impairment for speech. Evaluation from pure–tone audiometry. Archs Otolar 1963; 77: 598–602
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kryter K. Impairment to hearing from exposure to noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1973; 53: 1211, to 1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyregaard P., Robinson D., Hinchcliffe R. A feasibility study of diagnostic speech audiometry. 1976, NPL Acoustics Report Ac 73
   Google Scholar
• Macrae J. A procedure for classifying degree of hearing loss. J. Otolar. Soc. Aust. 1976; I: 26–35
   Google Scholar
• Macrae J., Brigden D. Auditory threshold impairment and everyday speech reception. Audiology 1973; 12: 272–290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merluzzi F., Hinchcliffe R. Threshold of subjective auditory handicap. Audiology 1973; 12: 65–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrill D. Psychomotor taxonomies, classifications, and instructional theory. Singer, The psychomotor domain: movement behavior. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1972; 385–414
   Google Scholar
• Nitchie E. New lessons in lipreading. Lippincott, New York 1930; 220–221
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. A new concept of damage risk criterion. Ann. occup. Hyg. 1970; 13: 69–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble W., Atherley G. The hearing measure scale. A questionnaire for the assessment of auditory disability. J. audit. Res. 1970; 10: 229–250
   Google Scholar
• Ogden C., Richards I. The meaning of meaning. Harcourt, Brace, New York 1923
   Google Scholar
• Sabine P. On estimating the percentage loss of useful hearing. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthal. Oto-lar. 1942; 46: 179–187
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S., Hirsh I. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1955; 64: 1234–1244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman S., Thurlow W., Walsh T., Davis H. Improvement in the social adequacy of hearing following the fenestration operation. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 607–631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton K., Hedgecock L. A laboratory assessment of hearing acuity for voice signals against a background of noise. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1953; 62: 115–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson E. The classification of educational objectives: psychomotor domain. University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1966
   Google Scholar
• Speaks G., Jerger J., Trammell J. Measurement of hearing handicap. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 768–776
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stevens S. Introduction: A definition of communication. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1950; 22: 689–690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter A. The ability of mildly hearing–impaired individuals to discriminate speech in noise. dissertation, University of Maryland. 1977
   Google Scholar
• Tillman T., Olsen W. Speech audiometry; in Jerger, Modern developments in audiology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York 1973; 37–74
   Google Scholar
• Webster J., Davis H., Ward W. Everyday speech intelligibility. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1965; 38: 668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K. Studies of auditory ability of hard–of–hearing patients. II. The relationship between self–rating and the results of audiometry. J. Otolar. Jap. 1976; 79: 1357–1367
   Google Scholar