17
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of Room Reverberation upon Hearing Aid Quality Judgments

&
Pages 253-262 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Ansi. Method of expressing hearing aid performance. American National Standards Institute, New York 1960, S 3.3–1960
  • Ansi. Acoustical terminology. American National Standards Institute, New York 1970, S 1.1–1970
  • Finitzo-Hieber T., Tillman T. W. The influence of reverberation and noise on the speech intelligibility of normal hearing and hard of hearing children in classroom size environments. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association Convention. 1975
  • ISO. Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure–tone audiometers. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva 1964, ISO Recommendation R 389
  • Jeffers J. Quality judgment in hearing aid selection. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1960; 25: 259–266
  • Jerger J. Behavioral correlates of hearing–aid performance. Bull. Prosthetics Res. Spring 1967
  • Jerger J., Malmquist C., Speaks C. Comparison of some speech intelligibility tests in the evaluation of hearing aid performance. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1960; 9: 253–258
  • Moncur J. P., Dirks D. Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1967; 10: 186–195
  • Nábělek A. K., Pickett J. M. Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974a; 56: 628–639
  • Nábělek A. K., Pickett J. M. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing–impaired listeners. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1974b; 17: 724–739
  • Shore I., Bilger R. C., Hirsh I. J. Hearing aid evaluation: reliability of repeated measures. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1960; 25: 152–170
  • Thompson G., Lassman F. Relationship of auditory distortion test results to speech discrimination through flat vs selective amplifying systems. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1969; 12: 594–606
  • Thompson G., Lassman F. Listener preference for selective vs. flat amplification for a high–frequency hearing loss population. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 667–672
  • Zerlin S. A new approach to hearing–aid selection. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1962; 5: 370–376

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.