L'audiométrie vocale au Québec français

References

• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Specifications for audiometers. ANSI S.3.6.-1969. American National Standards Institute, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• Benfante H., Charbonneau R., Arseneault A., Zinger A., Marti A., Champoux N. Audiometrie vocale. Hopital Maisonneuve, Montreal 1966
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. Speech discrimination task using multiple-choice key words in sentences. J. audit. Res. 1969; 9: 247–262
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. Speech audiometry; dans Rose, Audiological assessment; 2e ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1978
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz A. O., Hochberg I. Self-assessment of hearing handicap in the aged. Archs Otol 1971; 93: 25–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernatchez C., Toupin-Rochon C. Vérification de l'homogénéité des dissyllabes de Huguette Benfante; mémoire inédit, Montréal 1977
   Google Scholar
• Black J. W. Multiple-choice intelligibility tests. J. Speech and Hearing Disorders 1957; 22: 213–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R. B. Monitored live-voice as a test of auditory acuity. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1946a; 17: 339–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. B. Selection of hearing aids. Archs Otol 1946b; 44: 1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. B. A practical approach to the selection of hearing aids. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthal. Oto-Lar. Jan.-Feb., 1946c; 123–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R. B. Problems in the measurement of speech discrimination. Archs Otol 1965; 82: 253–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. B. Introduction; dans Pollack, Amplification for the hearing-impaired. Grune & Stratton, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Charron F., De La Durantaye A. Production d'un matériel destiné à la recherche du seuil d'intelligibilité de la parole; travail inédit, Montréal 1980
   Google Scholar
• Clarke F. R. Technique for evaluation of speech systems. US Army Electronics Laboratories. 1965, AD-473 995
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Silverman R. Hearing and deafness; 4e ed. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton B. J., Danhauer J. L. Clinical implications of speech discrimination testing using nonsense stimuli. University Park Press, Baltimore 1979
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing II. OSRD Rep 1944; 3802
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope. St Louis 1948; 955–991
   Google Scholar
• Elkins E., Causey D. G. Development of the speech reception test. DHEWPubl. No. (HRA) 1977; 78–1345
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks G. Test of phonemic differentiation: the rhyme test. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1958; 30: 596–600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer G. A., Davis H. The intelligibility of connected discourse as a test for the ‘threshold for speech’. Laryngoscope, St Louis 1947; 57: 581–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Speech and hearing. Van Nostrand, New York 1929
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. Speech and hearing in communication. Van Nostrand, New York 1953
   Google Scholar
• Fournier J. E. L'audiométrie vocale. Maloine, Paris 1951
   Google Scholar
• Goetzinger C. P. Word discrimination testing; in Katz, Handbook of clinical audiology. University Park Press, Baltimore 1978
   Google Scholar
• Guilford J. P. Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill, New York 1954, 1936
   Google Scholar
• Hebert R., Picard M. Test de discrimination de la parole. Prolingua, Longueuil 1979
   Google Scholar
• High W. S., Fairbanks G., Glorig A. Scale for self-assessment of hearing handicap. J. Speech and Hearing Disorders 1964; 29: 215–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. La mesure de l'audition. Presses universitaires de France, Paris 1956
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Davis H., Silverman S. R., Reynolds E. G., Eldert E., Bensen R. W. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J. Speech and Heaming Disorders 1952; 17: 321–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopkinson N. T. Speech reception threshold; dans Katz, Handbook of clinical audiology; 2e éd. University Park Press, Baltimore 1978
   Google Scholar
• House A. S., Williams C. E., Hecker M. H.L., Kryter K. D. Articulation testing methods: consonantal differentiation with a closed response set. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1965; 37: 158–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Hawkins J. E., Karlin J. E., Stevens S. S. The Development of recorded auditory test for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, St Louis 1947; 57: 57–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughson W., Thompson E. A. Correlation of hearing acuity for speech with discrete frequency audiograms. Archs Otol 1942; 36: 526–540
   Google Scholar
• Kalikow D. N., Stevens K. N., Elliot L. L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using materials with controlled word predictability. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1977; 61: 1337–1351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J. The use of SSW for assessing the integrity of central auditory nervous system. J. audit. Res. 1962; 2: 327–337
   Google Scholar
• Kirk R. E. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks-Coles, Belmont 1968
   Google Scholar
• Kreul E. J., Nixon J. C., Kryter K. D., Bell D. W., Lang J. S., Schubert E. D. A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 536–553
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre-Marchand M. Equivalence des listes PB C, D, G et H chez une population avec audition normale; travail dirigé inédit, Montréal 1974
   Google Scholar
• Lehiste I., Peterson G. E. Linguistic considerations in the study of speech intelligibility. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1959; 31: 280–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H., Collins M. J., Dubno J. R., Resnick S. B., White R. E. Development of a protocol for the prescriptive fitting of a wearable master hearing aid. CSL Res. Rep. 1978; 11
   Google Scholar
• McCartney J. H., Maurer J. F., Sorensen F. D. A comparison of the hearing handicap scale and the hearing measurement scale with standard audiometric measures on a geriatric population. J. audit. Res. 1976; 16: 51–58
   Google Scholar
• Mercure L., Roussin L. La mesure du seuil d'intelligibilité de la parole en surdité professionnelle; travail dirigé inédit, Montréal 1981
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1955; 27: 338–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millin J. P. Practical and philosophical considerations; dans Pollack, Amplification for the hearing-impaired. Grune & Stratton, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Newby H. A. Audiology; 4e éd. Prentice-Hall, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer W. Speech audiometry with phonetically balanced sentences. Int. Audiol. 1965; 4: 97–101
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. G. Assessment of hearing handicap: comment on the ‘Kryter Series’. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1975; 57: 750–752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble W. G. Assessment of impaired hearing. Academic Press, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Olsen W. O., Matkin N. D. Speech audiometry; dans Rintelmann, Hearing assessment. University Park Press, Baltimore 1979
   Google Scholar
• Owens E., Schubert E. D. Development of the California Consonant Test. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1977; 20: 463–474
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson G. E., Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J. Speech and Hearing Disorders 1962; 27: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A. M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raffin M. J., Thornton A. R. Confidence levels for differences between speech discrimination scores; a research note. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1980; 23: 5–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz M. C., Schubert E. D. A multiple choice discrimination test. Laryngoscope, St Louis 1969; 79: 382–399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman R., Hirsh I. J. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann. Otol. 1955; 64: 1234–1244
   Google Scholar
• Simard J. Equivalence des listes de monosyllabes A, B, E, F de Benfante et al.; travail dirigé inédit, Montréal 1974
   Google Scholar
• Speaks C., Jerger J. Method for measurement speech identification. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1965; 8: 185–194
   Google Scholar
• Speaks C., Jerger J., Trammell J. Measurement of hearing handicap. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 768–776
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stockdell K. G. Classical approaches to measuring discrimination efficiency via word lists; dans Rupp, Stockdell, Speech protocols in audiology. Grune & Stratton, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike R. M. Reliability; dans Bolton, Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976
   Google Scholar
• Thornton A. R., Raffin M. J. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1978; 21: 507–518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillman T. W., Carhart R. B. An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine. 1966, SAM-TR-66–55
   Google Scholar
• Tillman T. W., Olsen W. O. Speech audiometry; dans Jerger, Modern developments in audiology; 2e ed. Academic Press, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Tobin H. Disordered functions approach to audiologic diagnosis; dans Singh, Lynch, Diagnostic procedures in hearing, language and speech. University Park Press, Baltimore 1978
   Google Scholar