References
- American National Standards Institute. Acoustical terminology, S1.1–1960 (R1976). American National Standards Institute, New York 1976a
- American National Standards Institute. Specification for hearing aid characteristics, S3.22–1976. American National Standards Institute, New York 1976b
- Carhart R. Selection of hearing aids. Archs Otolar. 1946; 44: 1–18
- Davis H., Hudgins C. V., Marquis R. J., Nichols R. H., Peterson G. E., Ross D. A., Stevens S. S. The selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope 1946; 56: 85–115; 135–163
- Edgerton B. J., Klodd D. A., Beattie R. C. Half-list speech discrimination measures in hearing aid evaluations. Archs Otolar. 1978; 104: 669–672
- Engen T., McBurney D. H. Magnitude and category scales of the pleasantness of odors. J. exp. Psychol. 1964; 68: 435–440
- Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Kelsey P. A., Clack T. D. The relation between speech intelligibility and the electroacoustic characteristics of low-fidelity circuitry. J. audit. Res. 1961; 1: 357–381
- Jeffers J. Quality judgment in hearing aid selection. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1960; 25: 259–266
- Jerger J. Behavioral correlates of hearing-aid performance. Bull. Prosthet. Res. Spring, 1961
- Jerger J., Malmquiet C, Speaks C. Comparison of some speech intelligibility tests in the evaluation of hearing aid performance. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1966; 9: 253–258
- Jirsa R. E., Hodgson W. R. Effects of harmonic distortion in hearing aids on speech intelligibility for normals and hypacusics. J. audit. Res. 1970; 10: 213–217
- Koh S. D. Scaling musical preferences. J. exp. Psychol. 1965; 70: 79–82
- Kopra L. L., Blosser D. Effects of method of measurement on most comfortable loudness level for speech. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 497–508
- Kuennapas T., Wikstroem I. Measurement of occupational preferences: a comparison of scaling methods. Percept. Mot. Skills 1963; 17: 611–694
- Punch J. L. Quality judgments of hearing aid processed speech and music by normal and otopathologic listeners. J. Am. audit. Soc. 1978; 3: 179–188
- Shore I., Bilger R. C., Hirsh I. J. Hearing aid evaluation: reliability of repeated measures. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1960; 25: 152–170
- Stevens S. S. On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev. 1957; 64: 153–181
- Wales J. G., Goldstein D. P. Intramodel quality judgment of hearing aid processed speech. Am. Speech and Hearing Ass. Conv. 1977
- Welch R. E. The use of magnitude estimation in attitude scaling: constructing a measure of political dissatisfaction. Soc. Sci. Q. 1971; 52: 76–87
- Weldele F. J., Millin J. P. The usefulness of qualitative listener judgments in evaluating hearing aids. Ohio J. Speech and Hearing 1975; 11: 39–47
- Zerlin S. A new approach to hearing-aid selection. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1962; 5: 370–376