Investigations of the Residual Hearing Capacity of Severely Hearing-Impaired and Profoundly Deaf Subjects

References

• Bamford J. M., Wilson I. M., Atkinson D., Bench R. J. Pure tone audiograms from hearing impaired children. I. A statistical approach to summarizing audiogram information. Scand. Audiol. 1980; 9: 195–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford J. M., Wilson I. M., Atkinson D., Bench R. J. Pure tone audiograms from hearing impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram. Br. J. Audiol. 1981; 15: 3–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonding P. Frequency-selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss. Scand. Audiol. 1979; 8: 205–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buus S., Florentine M., Redden R. B. The SISI-test: a review.Parts I, II. Audiology 1982; 21: 273–293; 365–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS Report ‘Gehandicapten Welgeteld’: Part III; Tables. Gravenhage 1976
   Google Scholar
• Coles R. R.A. Can present-day audiology really help in diagnosis? An otologist's question. J. Lar. Otol. 1972; 86: 192–224
   Google Scholar
• DiCarlo L. M. Some relationships between frequency discrimination and speech perception performance. J. audit. Res. 1962; 2: 37–49
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler W. A., Plomp R. Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing impaired subjects. I. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1980; 68: 1608–1615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler W. A., Plomp R. Relation between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing impaired subjects; unpublished doct. thesis Amsterdam 1983
   Google Scholar
• Eliott L. L. Tonal thresholds for short-duration stimuli as related to subject hearing level. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1963; 35: 578–580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliott L. L. Temporal and masking phenomena in persons with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1975; 14: 336–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliott D. N., Riach W. D., Sheposh J. P., Trahiotis C. Discrimination performance of high-school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests. Acta oto-lar. 1966, suppl. 216
   Google Scholar
• Erber N. P. Speech envelope cues as an acoustic aid to lipreading for profoundly deaf children. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1972; 44: 1224–1227
   Google Scholar
• Erber N. P. Pure tone thresholds and word-recognition abilities of hearing-impaired children. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1974; 17: 194–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans L. Factors related to listening and lipreading. Teach. Deaf 1960; 58: 417–423
   Google Scholar
• Festen J. M., Plomp R. Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1981; 70: 356–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J. M., Plomp R. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1983; 73: 652–662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gengel R. W. Temporal effects in frequency discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1973; 54: 11–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Myers C. K. Brief-tone audiometry. Archs Otolar 1958; 67: 699–713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra A. Frequency discrimination and frequency analysis in hearing; unpublished doct. thesis Groningen 1979
   Google Scholar
• Horst J. W. Discrimination of complex signals in hearing; unpublished doct. thesis Groningen 1982
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V. Auditory training: its possibilities and limitations. Volta Rev 1954; 56: 339–349
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics-Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone audiometers 1975, ISO Standard 389
   Google Scholar
• Knott G. D. Mlab - A mathematical modelling tool. Comp. Programs Biomed. 1972; 10: 271–280
   Google Scholar
• Lamoré P.J.J., Rodenburg M. Significance of the SISI test and its relation to recruitment. Audiology 1980; 19: 75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoré P.J.J., Verweij C., Brocaar M. P. Reliability of auditory functions for severely hearing-impaired and deaf subjects. Audiology 1984; 23: 453–466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids. Scand. Audiol., suppl. 1978; 6: 199–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyregaard P. E. Frequency-selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise. Scand. Audiol. 1982; 113–122, suppl. 15
   Google Scholar
• Martin M. C., Fourcin A. J. Results of synthetic speech tests with deaf children; unpublished RNID report (1975); cited in Martin M. C., Stevenson P. W., Grover B. C., Some aspects of auditory space, speech perception and the use of hearing aids. Scand. Audiol., suppl. 1978; 6: 141–161
   Google Scholar
• Mártony J. Some psychoacoustic tests with hearingimpaired children 1977, STL-OPSR 2–3/1974,72–89; cited in Risberg
   Google Scholar
• Mullins C. J., Bangs J. L. Relationships between speech discrimination and other audiometric data. Acta oto-lar. 1957; 47: 149–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NCHS. Prevalence of selected impairments, United States 1971. Natn. Cent. Health Statist., Vital and Health Statist. PHS Publ. Series 11 - No. 145, DHEW Publ. No. (HRA) 75–1627. Rockville 1975
   Google Scholar
• Nie N., Hull C. H., Franklin M. N., Jenkins J. G., Sours K. J., Norušis M.J., Beadle V. SCSS. A user's guide to the SCSS conversational system. McGraw Hill, Maidenhead 1980
   Google Scholar
• Noble W. G. Pure tone acuity, speech hearing ability and deafness in acoustic trauma. Audiology 1973; 12: 291–315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Numbers M. E., Hudgins C. V. Speech perception in present day education for deaf children. Volta Rev 1948; 50: 449–456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R. D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D. L., Milroy R. The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiograms and speech threshold. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1982; 72: 1788–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick G. F., Evans E. F., Wilson J. P. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Evans Wilson. 1977
   Google Scholar
• Pickett J. M., Mártony J. Low-frequency vowel formant discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1970; 13: 347–359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R., Bouman M. A. Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1959; 31: 749–758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1978; 63: 533–549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A. M. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1979; 66: 1333–1341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prall J. Lipreading and hearing aids combine for better comprehension. Volta Rev 1957; 59: 64–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risberg A., Màrtony J. A method for classification of audiograms. Fant Proc. Int. Symp. Speech Communication Ability and Profound Deafness, Stockholm 1970. A.G. Bell Association for the Deaf, Washington 1972
   Google Scholar
• Risberg A. Hearing loss and auditory capacity. Res. Conf. Speech Proc. Hearing Aids for the Deaf, Washington, 1977
   Google Scholar
• Risberg A. Diagnostic rhyme test for speech audiometry with severely hard of hearing and profoundly deaf children 1977, STL-QPSR 2–3/1976; cited in Risberg
   Google Scholar
• Ross M., Huntington D. A., Newby H. A., Dixon R. F. Speech discrimination of hearing-impaired individuals in noise. J. audit. Res. 1965; 5: 47–72
   Google Scholar
• Ross M., Kessler M. E., Phillips M. E., Lerman J. W. Visual auditory and combined mode presentations of the WIPI test to hearing impaired children. Volta Rev 1972; 74: 90–96
   Google Scholar
• Sanders D. A. Auditory training within a communication framework. Proc. 43rd Meet. Conv. Instructors of the Deaf. US Government Printing Office, Washington 1968; 254–258
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R. S., Wood E. J., Fernandes M. Frequency resolution and hearing loss. Br. J. Audiol. 1982; 16: 45–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler R. S., Holland S. J., Harker L. H., Gantz B. J. The relationship between pure tone thresholds and psychoacoustical tuning curves in the hearing impaired: preliminary findings. Klinke, Hartmann, Hearing, physiological basis and psychophysics. Springer, Berlin 1983
   Google Scholar
• Uden A. van. A sound perceptive method. Ewing, The modern educational treatment of deafness chap. 19. Volta Bureau, Washington 1960; 3–12
   Google Scholar
• Uden A. van. New realizations in the light of the pure oral method. Volta Rev 1970; 72: 524–537
   Google Scholar
• Watson C. S., Gengel R. W. Signal duration and signal frequency in relation to auditory sensitivity. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1969; 46: 989–997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedenberg E. Auditory training of severely hard of hearing pre-school children. Acta oto-lar. 1954, suppl. 110
   Google Scholar
• Zurek P. M., Formby C. Frequency discrimination ability of hearing-impaired listeners. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1981; 46: 108–112
   Google Scholar