Rate and Filter Effects on the Developing Middle-Latency Response

References

• Buchwald J. S., Hinman C., Norman R. J., Huang C. M., Brown K. A. Middle and long-latency auditory evoked potentials recorded from the vertex of normal and chronically lesioned cats. Brain Res 1981; 205: 91–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H., Hirsh S. K., Turpin L. L. Possible utility of middle latency responses in electric response audiometry. Adv. Oto-Rhino-Laryng., vol. 31. Karger, Basel 1983; 208–216
   Google Scholar
• Engel R. Early waves of the electroencephalic auditory response in neonates. Neuropadiatrie 1971; 3: 147–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fifer R. C., Jerger J. F., Null D. M. Effects of stimulation rate on MLR and HRD in neonates. Asha 1984; 26: 110
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P. J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerling I. J., Finitzo-Hieber X. Auditory brainstem response with high stimulus rates in normal and patient populations. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1983; 92: 119–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham J., Greenwood R., Lecky B. Cortical deafness: a case reported.Review of the literature. J. neurol. Sci. 1980; 48: 35–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R., Haythorn M. M. Effects of age and stimulus intensity of the far field auditory brain stem potentials in the laboratory mouse. Dev. Psychobiol. 1978; 11: 161–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaga K., Hink R., Shinoda Y., Suzuki J. Evidence for a primary cortical origin of a middle latency auditory evoked potential in cats. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1980; 50: 254–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavanaugh K. T., Harker L. A., Tyler R. S. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effects of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-Hz tone pip. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1984; 93: 108, pp. 2–12
   Google Scholar
• Kileny P. Auditory evoked middle latency responses: current issues. Semin. in Hearing 1983; 4: 403–413
   Google Scholar
• Kileny P., Shea S. Middle-latency and 40-Hz auditory evoked responses in normal-hearing subjects: click and 500-Hz thresholds. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1986; 19: 20–28
   Google Scholar
• Knight R. T., Brailowsky S., Scabini D., Simpson G. V. Surface auditory evoked potentials in the unrestrained rat: component definition. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1985; 61: 430–439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus N., Özdamar Ö., Heir D., Stein L. Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1982; 54: 275–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus N., Özdamar Ö., Stein L., Hier D. Simultaneous recordings of the auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in normal subjects and neurological patients. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 1980; 6: 276
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Smith D. I., McGee T, Stein L., Cartee C. Development of the middle latency response in an animal model and its relation to the human response. Hearing Res 1987b; 68: 234–236
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Smith D. I., Reed N., Stein L., Cartee C. Highpass filter settings affect the detectability of MLRs in humans. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987b, in press
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Smith D. I., Reed N. L., Stein L. K., Cartee C. Auditory middle latency responses in children: effect of age and diagnostic category. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1985; 62: 343–351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laukli E., Mair I. W.S. Development of early auditory-evoked responses in the cat: filter effects. Audiology 1982; 21: 350–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland W. H., Vivian M. D., Wolf K. E., Goldstein R. Reexamination of effects of stimulus rate and number on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response. Audiology 1975; 14: 456–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee T, Kraus N., Manfreddi C. Towards a strategy for analyzing the human MLR waveform 1987, Submitted
   Google Scholar
• McGee T. J., Özdamar Ö., Kraus N. Auditory middle latency response in the guinea pig. Am. J. Otolar. 1983; 4: 116–122
   Google Scholar
• McRandle C. C., Smith M. A., Goldstein R. Early averaged electroencephalic responses to clicks in neonates. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1983; 83: 695–701
   Google Scholar
• Mendelson T., Salamy A. Maturational effects on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1981; 46: 140–144
   Google Scholar
• Picton T. W., Hillyard S. A., Krausz H. I., Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1974; 36: 179–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salamy A., McKean C. M. Postnatal development of human brainstem potentials during the first year of life. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1976; 40: 418–426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherg M. Distortion of the middle latency auditory response produced by analogue filtering. Scand. Audiol. 1982; 11: 57–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherg M., Von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1986; 65: 344–360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shipley C., Buchwald J. S., Norman R., Buthric D. Brain stem auditory evoked response development in kitten. Brain Res 1980; 182: 313–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith D. I., Kraus N. Postnatal development of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in the un-anesthetized gerbil. Hearing Res 1987, in press
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D. R., Linden D., Suffield J. B., Hamel G., Picton T. W. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear and Hearing 1984; 5: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A., Farley G. R. Middle and long latency auditory evoked potentials in cat. II. Component distributions and dependence on stimulus factors. Hearing Res 1983; 10: 139–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T, Hirabayashi M., Kobayashi K. Auditory middle responses in young children. Br. J. Audiol. 1983a; 17: 5–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T, Hirabayashi M., Kobayashi K. Effects of analogue and digital filtering on auditory middle latency responses in adults and young children. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1984; 93: 267–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki X, Hirai Y., Horiuchi K. Simultaneous recording of early and middle components of auditory electric response. Ear and Hearing 1981; 2: 276–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T., Kobayashi K. An evaluation of 40-Hz event-related potentials in young children. Audiology 1984; 23: 599–604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki X, Kobayashi K., Hirabayashi M. Frequency composition of auditory middle responses. Br. J. Audiol. 1983b; 17: 1–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf K. E., Goldstein R. Middle component AERs from neonates to low level tonal stimuli. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1980; 23: 185–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshida M., Lowry L. D., Liu J. J.C., Kaga K. Auditory 40-Hz responses in the guinea pig. Am. J. Otolar. 1984; 5: 404–410
   Google Scholar