The Chirp Train Streaming Test

References

• Anderson H., Barr R. Conductive recruitment. Acta oto-lar. 1966; 62: 171–184
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antonelli A. R., Sambarato G., Gaini R. Intensity and frequency discrimination monitored by ERA: clinical application. Audiology 1976; 15: 508–513
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arlinger S. Auditory processing of frequency ramps. Audiology 1977; 16: 480–486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arlinger S. Electric and biomagnetic responses to frequency glides recorded from subjects with normal and impaired ears. Carlson, Grandström: The representation of speech in the peripheral auditory system. Elsevier Biomedical press, Amsterdam 1982; 271–290
   Google Scholar
• Barnes-Gutteridge W. Psychology. Hamlyn, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein J. M. Immune mechanisms in otitis media with effusion. Sadé, Secretory otitis media and its sequelae. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1979; 154–170
   Google Scholar
• Boer E. de, Bouwmeester J. Critical bands and sen-sorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1974; 13: 236–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer E. de, Bouwmeester J. Clinical psychophysics illustrated by the problem of auditory overload. Audiology 1975; 14: 274–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S. Auditory streaming: competition among alternative organizations. Percept. Psychophys. 1978; 5: 391–398
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S. Asking the ‘what for’ question in auditory perception. Kobovy, Pomerantz, Perceptual organization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1981
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S. Auditory scene analysis. Proc. IEEE 7th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S. The meaning of duplex perception: sounds as transparent objects. Psychophysics and speech perception. NATO Adv. Res. Works., Utrecht 1986, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S., Achim A. Visual stream segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 1973; 13: 451–454
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S., Campbell J. Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. J. exp. Psychol. 1971; 89: 244–249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bregman A. S., Dannenbring G. L. The effect of continuity on auditory stream segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 1973; 13: 308–312
   Google Scholar
• Bregman A. S., Rudnicky A. Auditory segregation, stream or streams. J.exp. Psychol. 1975; 1: 263–267
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. E. Perception and communication. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1958
   Google Scholar
• Clarke F. R., Bilger R. C. The theory of signal detect-ability and the measurement of hearing. Jerger, Modern developments in audiology. Academic Press, New York 1973; 437–467
   Google Scholar
• Collins M. J., Cullen J. K., Jr. Effects of background noise level on detection of tone glides. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1984; 76: 1696–1698
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullen J. K., Jr., Collins M. J. Audibility of short-duration tone glides as function of rate of frequency change. Hearing Res 1982; 7: 115–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dannenbring G. L. Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. Can. J. Psychol. 1976; 30: 99–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dannenbring G. L., Bregman A. S. Stream segregation and the illusion of overlap. J. exp. Psychol. 1976; 2: 544–555
   Google Scholar
• Dannenbring G. L., Bregman A. S. Streaming vs.fusion of sinusoidal components of complex tones. Percept. Psychophys. 1978; 24: 369–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies D. R., Jones D. M., Taylor A. Selective- and sustained-attention tasks, individual and group differences. Parasuraman, Davies, Varieties of attention. Academic Press, New York 1984; 395–447
   Google Scholar
• Elmasian R., Galambos R. Loudness enhancement: monaural, binaural and dichotic. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1975; 58: 229–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein A., Katz J., Dickinson J. T. Low-level stimulation in the differentiation of middle ear pathology. Acta oto-lar. 1962; 55: 81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Era P., Jokela J., Qvarnberg Y., Heikkinen E. Pure-tone thresholds, speech understanding, and their correlates in samples of men of different ages. Audiology 1986; 25: 338–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans E. F., Comment on Patterson R. D. Milroy R. The effect of age on auditory filter shapes, van den Brink, Bilsen. Psychophysical, physiological and behavioral studies in hearing. Delft University Press, Delft 1980; 140–143
   Google Scholar
• Festen J. M., Plomp R. Relations between auditory functions in impaired hearing. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1983; 73: 652–662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D. The future research needs of audiology. Northern, Hearing disorders. Little, Brown, Boston 1976; 269–278
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R. V., Aran J. M. Electrocochleographic measures of frequency selectivity in human deafness. Br. J. Audiol. 1982; 16: 179–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellman R., Scharf B. Acoustic reflex and loudness. Silman, The acoustic reflex. Academic Press, New York 1984; 469–516
   Google Scholar
• Henry K. R. Effects of dietary restriction on presbyacusis in the mouse. Audiology 1986; 25: 329–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. The threshold of hearing as a function of age. Acustica 1959; 9: 303–308
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. La mesure de l'audition. Presses Univer-sitaires de France, Paris 1956
   Google Scholar
• Humes L. E. Spectral and temporal resolution by the hearing impaired, Studebaker, Bess, The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report. Monographs in contemporary audiology 1982; 16–31
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1973
   Google Scholar
• König E. On the use of hearing-aid type earphones in clinical audiometry. Acta oto-lar. 1962; 55: 331–341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• König E. In Discussion: Broadbent, Stephens, Alternatives to threshold measurement in the assessment of hearing. Wolstenholme, Knight, Sensorineural hearing loss. Churchill, London 1970; 174
   Google Scholar
• Lenhardt M. L. Effects of frequency modulation on auditory averaged evoked response. Audiology 1971; 10: 18–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhardt M. L. Wave V latency and chirp (linear frequency ramp): repetition rate. Audiology 1982; 21: 425–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshowitz B., Lindstrom R. Measurement of non-linearities in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Psychophysics and physiology of hearing, Wilson Evans. Academic Press, New York 1977; 283–293
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M. E., Wood E. J. A simple clinical measure of frequency resolution. Br. J. Audiol. 1985; 19: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Møller A. R. Two different types of frequency selective neurons in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. Plomp, Smorenburg, Proc. Int. Symp. on Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. Sijthoff, Leiden 1970; 168–174
   Google Scholar
• Møller A. R. Coding of amplitude and frequency-modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus. Acustica 1974; 31: 292–299
   Google Scholar
• Møller A. R. Coding of sounds with rapidly varying spectrum in the cochlear nucleus. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974; 55: 631–640
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Møller A. R. Neurophysiological basis of discrimination of speech sounds. Audiology 1978; 17: 1–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Some experiments relating to the perception of pure tones: possible clinical applications. Sound 1972; 6: 73–79
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. An introduction to the psychology of hearing. Academic Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Frequency selectivity in hearing. Academic Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Nabelek I. V. Masking of tone glides, in Hirsh, Eldredge, Hirsh, Silverman, Hearing and Davis. Washington University Press, St. Louis 1976; 213–224
   Google Scholar
• Naunton R. F. Presbycusis. Paparella, Shumrick, Otolaryngology, vol. 2: Ear. Saunders, Philadelphia 1973; 368–376
   Google Scholar
• Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. Appleton Century Crofts, New York 1967
   Google Scholar
• Nixon J. C., Glorig A., High W. S. Changes in air and bone conduction thresholds as a function of age. J. Lary. 1962; 76: 288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble W. Hearing, hearing impairment, and the audible world: a theoretical essay. Audiology 1983; 22: 325–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortscheid J. The effects of noise on cognitive processes. Schilk, Höge, Lazarusmainka, Contributions to psychological acoustics. Biblio-theksund Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg 1986; 138–154
   Google Scholar
• Pick G. F., Evans E. F. Dissociation between frequency resolution and hearing threshold. Klinke, Hartman, Hearing-physiological bases and psychophysics. Springer, Berlin 1983; 393–399
   Google Scholar
• Regan D., Tansley B. W. Selective adaptation to frequency modulated tones: evidence for an information-processing channel selectivity sensitive to frequency changes. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1979; 65: 1249–1257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick J., Heinz M., Bookstein E. W., Pagano R. V. Characteristics of the FFP to linear tone glides. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1984; 75: 1
   Google Scholar
• Rigo T. G. The relationship between the visual contribution to speech perception and lipreading ability during focused and divided attention. Ear and Hearing 1986; 4: 266–272
   Google Scholar
• Sadé J. Pathology and pathogenesis of secretory otitis media. Archs Otolar 1966; 84: 297–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadé J. The muco-ciliary system in relation to middle ear pathology and sensorineural hearing loss. Wolstenholme, Knight, Sensorineural hearing loss. Churchill, London 1970; 79–99
   Google Scholar
• Sadé J. The atelectatic ear, pp. 64–88; The nature of middle ear effusions; the biochemical aspect, pp. 144–153. Sadé, Secretory otitis media and its sequelae. Churchill, Livingstone 1979
   Google Scholar
• Sadé J. Acute and secretory otitis media. Kugler, Amsterdam 1986
   Google Scholar
• Sadé J. The Eustachian tube. Kugler, Amsterdam 1987
   Google Scholar
• Scharf B., Florentine M. Psychoacoustics of elementary sounds. Studebaker, Bess, The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report. Monographs in contemporary audiology. 1982; 3–15
   Google Scholar
• Scharf B., Quigley S., Aoki C., Peachey N., Reeves A. Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity. Percept. Psychophys. 1987; 42: 215–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F. Presbycusis. Laryngoscope 1955; 65: 402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuknecht H. F. Further observations on presbycusis. Archs otolar 1964; 80: 369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinex D. G., Geisler C. D. Auditory nerve fiber responses to frequency modulated tones. Hearing Res 1981; 2: 127–148
   Google Scholar
• Smits J. T.S., Duifhuis H. Masking and partial masking in listeners with a high frequency hearing loss. Audiology 1982; 21: 310–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoor A., Timmer F., Odenthal D. W. The evoked auditory responses to intensity modulated and frequency modulated tones and tone bursts. Int. Audiol. 1969; 8: 410–415
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield Q., Assmann P. Auditory enhancement in speech perception. Psychophysics of speech perception. NATO Adv. Res. Works., Utrecht 1986, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Sutton G. L., Wilson J. P. Modelling cochlear echoes: the influence of irregularities in frequency mapping on summed cochlear activity, de Boer, Viergever. Mechanics of hearing. Delft University Press, Delft 1983; 83–90
   Google Scholar
• Swets J. A. Central factors in auditory selectivity. Psychol. Bull. 1963; 60: 429–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets J. A. Mathematical models of attention. Parasuraman, Davies, Varieties of attention. Academic Press, New York 1984; 183–242
   Google Scholar
• Tanner W. P., Sorkin R. D. The theory of signal detectability. Tobias, Foundations of modern auditory theory, vol. 2. Academic Press, New York 1972; 65–98
   Google Scholar
• Tansley B. W., Regan D. Separate auditory channels for unidirectional frequency modulation and unidirectional amplitude modulation. Sensory Processes 1979; 3: 132–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trenque P., Gazeaud F. Latency of brain stem responses to chirps (linear frequency ramp-bursts). Audiology 1978; 17: 213–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler R. S. Frequency resolution in hearing-impaired listeners. Moore, Frequency selectivity in hearing. Academic Press, New York 1986; 309–371
   Google Scholar
• Tyler R. S., Holland S. J., Harker L. A., Gantz B. J. The relationship between pure-tone thresholds and psychoacoustical tuning curves in the hearing impaired: preliminary findings. Klinke, Hartman, Hearing - Physiological bases and psychoacoustics. Springer, Berlin 1983; 385–392
   Google Scholar
• Van Noorden L. P.A.S. Minimum differences of level and frequency for perceptual fission of tone sequences ABAB. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1977; 61: 1041–1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian I. A. On mechanisms of specialized reactions of central auditory neurons to frequency-modulated sounds. Acustica 1974; 31: 305–310
   Google Scholar
• Vickers D. Decision processes in visual perception. Academic Press, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield G. H., Viemeister N. F. Selective adaptation to linear frequency-modulated sweeps: evidence for direction-specific FM channels. J.acoust. Soc. Am. 1984; 75: 1588–1592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J. P. Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emission, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hearing Res 1980; 2: 233–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanz J. L. The application of the theory of signal detection to the assessment of speech perception. Ear and Hearing 1984; 5: 64–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yost W. A., Nielsen D. W. Fundamentals of hearing. Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Schorn K. Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiology 1978; 17: 120–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwicker E., Schorn K. Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients. Audiology 1982; 21: 414–492
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. J., Ketkar I., Cannon M. W., Nodar R. H. Loudness enhancement and summation in pairs of short sound bursts. Percept. Psychophys. 1974; 16: 91–95
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. J., Sokolich W. G. On loudness enhancement of a tone burst by a preceding tone burst. Percept. Psychophys. 1974; 16: 87–90
   Google Scholar