Electrode Placement and Mode of Recording (Differential vs. Single-Ended) Effects on the Early Auditory-Evoked Response

References

• Berlin C I, Dobie RA. Electrophysiologic measures of auditory function via electrocochleography and brainstem-evoked response. Hearing Assessment, WF Rintelmann. University Park Press, Baltimore 1979; 425–458
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Hecox KE. Clinical applications of the auditory brain stem response. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11: 709–722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasscock M E, Jackson C G, Josey A F. Brainstem evoked response audiometry in a clinical practice. Laryngoscope 1979; 89: 1021–1035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson JT. An overview of the auditory brainstem response. The auditory brainstem response, J Jacobson. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1985; 3–12
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Smith AD. The practice of evoked potential audiometry. Otolaryngol clin North Am 1978; 11: 263–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappa K H, Gladstone K J, Young RR. Brain stem auditory evoked responses - studies of waveform variations in 50 normal human subjects. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 81–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Mauldin L. Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1978; 104: 456–461
   Google Scholar
• House J W, Brackmann DE. Brainstem audiometry in neurotologic diagnosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1979; 105: 305–309
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, Kibbe K, Rackliffe L. The auditory brain stem response I-V amplitude ratio in normal, cochlear, and retrocochlear ears. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 52–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A, Achor J. Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol 1975; 32: 761–768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber BA. Pitfalls in auditory brain stem response audiometry. Ear Hear 1983; 4: 179–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde ML. Instrumentation and signal processing. The Auditory Brainstem Response, J Jacobson. College-Hill Press, San Diego 1985; 33–48
   Google Scholar
• Hall J W, Morgan S H, Mackey-Hargadine J. Neuro-otologic applications of simultaneous multichannel auditory evoked response recordings. Laryngoscope 1984; 97: 883–889
   Google Scholar
• Howe S W, Decker TN. Auditory evoked potential: Effects of recording site. Hear Instr 1980; 31: 22–50
   Google Scholar
• Martin ME, Moore EJ. Scalp distribution of the early (0–10 msec) auditory evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1977; 103: 326–328
   Google Scholar
• Parker DJ. Dependence of the brainstem response on electrode location. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981; 107: 367–371
   Google Scholar
• Streletz L J, Katz L, Hohenberger M. Scalp recorded auditory evoked potentials and sonomotor responses: an evaluation of components and recording techniques. Electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol 1977; 43: 192–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P. The influence of reference electrode position on recording of the auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 9–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg L. Physiological mechanisms in auditory brainstem-evoked response. Scand Audiol 1981; 11–22, Suppl 13
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald JS, Generators, Moore EJ. Bases of auditory brain-stem evoked responses. Grune and Stratton, New York 1983; 157–195
   Google Scholar
• Grandori F. Field analysis of auditory evoked brainstem potentials. Hear Res 1986; 21: 51–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller A R, Janetta P, Bennett M. Intracranially recorded responses from the human auditory nerve: New insights into the origin of brain stem evoked potentials (BSEPs). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 52: 18–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherg M, Von Cramon D. A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP Waves I-V: results of a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 290–299
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanz J L, Dodds HJ. An ear canal electrode for the measurement of the human auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 98–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats AC. On electrocochleographic electrode design. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 708–711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats AC. Electrocochleography: Recording techniques and clinical applications. Semin. Hear 1986; 7: 247–266
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro J A, Murphy G B, Ruth RA. A comparative study of primary electrodes used in extratympanic electrocochleography. Semin. Hear 1986; 7: 279–286
   Google Scholar
• Harder H, Arlinger S. Ear-canal compared to mastoid electrode placement in BRA. Scand Audiol 1981; 13, (supp: 55–57)
   Google Scholar
• Ruth R A, Mills J A, Jane JA. Intraoperative monitoring of electrocochleographic and auditory brainstem responses. Semin Hear 1986; 7: 307–327
   Google Scholar
• Coats AC. Instrumentation. Bases of auditory brainstem evoked responses, EJ Moore. Grune & Stratton, New York 1983; 197–220
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson J T, Hyde ML. An introduction to auditory evoked potentials. Handbook of clinical audiology, ed 3, J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 496–533
   Google Scholar
• Starr A, Squires K. Distribution of auditory brainstem potentials over the scalp and nasopharynx in humans. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982; 388: 427–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson D L, Hirasugi Y, Starr A. Auditory brainstem potentials recorded at different scalp locations in neonates and adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94: 236–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P, Huis in't Veld F. Electrocochleography with a far field technique. Scand Audiol 1973; 2: 141–148
   Google Scholar
• Beattie R C, Taggart LA. Effects of amplifier type (single-ended vs differential) and electrode placement on early auditory evoked potentials. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 147–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R C, Beguwala F E, Mills D M. Latency and amplitude effects of electrode placement on the early auditory evoked response. J Speech Hear Dis 1986; 51: 1–8
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. American national standard specifications for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York 1970, (ANSI S3.6–1969)
   Google Scholar
• Lybarger SF. The physical and electroacoustic characteristics of hearing aids. Handbook of clinical audiology, ed 3, J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985; 849–884
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. American national standard methods for manual pure-tone audiometry. American National Standards Institute, New York 1978, (ANSI S3.21–1978)
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85(suppl 28)1–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fria TJ. The auditory brain stem response: background and clinical implications. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, D Schwartz, F Bess. Maico Hearing Instruments, Minneapolis 1980; vol 2: 1–44
   Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Stapells D R, Campbell KB. Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. J Otolaryngol 1981; 10: 1–41
   Google Scholar
• Stockard J J, Stockard J E, Sharbrough FW. Non-pathologic factors influencing brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Am Electroencephalogr Technol 1978; 18: 177–209
   Google Scholar
• Mehrens W A, Lehmann IJ. Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Bruning J L, Kintz BL. Computational Handbook of Statistics, ed 2. Scott, Foresman, Glenview 1977
   Google Scholar
• Rowe MJ. The brainstem auditory evoked response in neurological disease: a review. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 41–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe MJ. Normal variability of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 44: 459–470
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz D M, Berry GA. Normative aspects of the ABR. The Auditory Brainstem Response, J Jacobson. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1985; 65–97
   Google Scholar
• Durrant JD. Observations on combined noninvasive electrocochleography and auditory brainstem response recording. Semin Hear 1986; 7: 289–304
   Google Scholar
• Stockard J E, Stockard J J, Westmoreland B F. Brainstem auditory-evoked responses – normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 823–831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevanishvili ZS. Considerations of the sources of the human brainstem auditory evoked potential on the basis of bilateral asymmetry of its parameters. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 197–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P, Huis in't Veld F. Far field electrocochleography electrode positions. Scand Audiol 1974; 3: 123–129
   Google Scholar
• Van Olphen A F, Rodenburg M, Verwey C. Distribution of brainstem responses to acoustic stimuli over the human scalp. Audiology 1978; 17: 511–518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don M, Elberling C, Waring M. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 219–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Don M. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: 115–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T W, Linden R D, Hamel G. Aspects of averaging. Semin Hear 1983; 4: 327–340
   Google Scholar
• Hoth S. Reliability of latency and amplitude values of auditory-evoked potentials. Audiology 1986; 25: 248–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J, Spoor A. Cochlear adaptation in guinea pigs. Audiology 1973; 12: 193–220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar