Detuning of Cochlear Action Potential Tuning Curves at High Sound Pressure Levels: Influence of Temporal, Spectral and Intensity Variables

References

• Arthur R. M., Pfeiffer R. R., Suga N. Properties of ‘two-tone inhibition’ in primary auditory neurones. J. Physiol., Lond. 1971; 212: 593–609
   Google Scholar
• Brown C. J., Abbas P. J. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 1987; 25: 193–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buus S., Florentine M., Mason C. R. Tuning curves at high frequencies and their relation to the absolute threshold curve. Moore, Patterson, Auditory frequency and selectivity. Plenum Press, New York 1986; 341–350
   Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Cheatham M. A. Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1976; 59: 591–597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Cheatham M. A. Analog of two-tone suppression in whole nerve responses. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1977; 62: 1048–1051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Harris D., Ozdamar O., Ryan A. Behavioral, compound action potential, and single unit thresholds: relationship in normal and abnormal ears. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1978; 64: 151–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan T. G., Klein A. J. Effect of signal temporal shaping on the frequency specificity of the action potential in gerbils. Audiology 1987; 26: 20–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolan T. G., Mills J. H., Schmiedt R. A. A comparison of brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber tuning curves of the gerbil: normative data. Hear. Res. 1985; 17: 259–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duifhuis H. Cochlear nonlinearity and second filter: Possible mechanism and implications. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1976; 59: 408–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans E. F. Single unit studies of the mammalian auditory nerve. Beagley, Auditory investigations: the scientific and technological basis. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1979; 324–367
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. M. Action potential suppression, tuning curves, and thresholds: comparison with single fiber data. Hear. Res. 1979; 1: 133–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R. V. Rate-versus-intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1981; 70: 1036–1044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R. V. Objective measures of cochlear frequency selectivity in animals and in man: a review. Acta neurol. psychiat. belg. 1984; 84: 213–232
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R. V., Aran J.-M., Erre J.-P. AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1981; 69: 1374–1385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R. ON and OFF components of the auditory brainstem response have different frequency- and intensity-specific properties. Hear. Res. 1985a; 18: 245–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF response is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response. Hear. Res. 1985b; 19: 115–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R. Forward masking and unmasking of the offset cochlear compound action potential in the gerbil: comparison with suppression areas of the onset cochlear compound action potential. Hear. Res. 1987a; 30: 1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R. Compound action potential offset and onset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking in the mongolian gerbil: effects of varying the intensity of the probe stimulus from 55 to 85 dB. Hear. Res. 1987b; 30: 49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R., Chole R. A. Genotypic differences in behavioral, physiological, and anatomical expressions of age-related hearing loss in the laboratory mouse. Audiology 1980; 19: 369–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K. R., Lewis E. R. The shape of the cochlear offset compound action potential masking tuning curve is robust to wide ranges of acoustic splatter 1988, manuscript in preparation
   Google Scholar
• Houtgast T. Psychophysical experiments on ‘tuning curves’ and ‘two-tone inhibition’. Acustica 1973; 29: 168–179
   Google Scholar
• Jesteadt W., Bacon S. P., Lehman J. R. Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level and signal delay. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1982; 71: 950–962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesteadt W., Norton S. J. The role of suppression in psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1985; 78: 365–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N. Y. S., Moxon E. C. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1972; 57: 714–730
   Google Scholar
• Kidd G., Jr., Feth L. J. Patterns of residual masking. Hear. Res. 1981; 5: 49–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis E. R., Henry K. R. Differences of transient cochlear nerve responses to positive and negative ramp modulation. 8th Int. Symp. Hearing: Basic Issues in Hearing, Groningen, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Lutfi R. A. Interpreting measures of frequency selectivity: is forward masking special. J.acoust. Soc. Am. 1988; 83: 163–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C. J. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1978; 63: 524–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdamar O., Dallos P. Synchronous responses of the primary auditory fibers to the onset of tone bursts and their relation to compound action potenials. Brain Res 1978; 155: 169–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer A. R., Harrison R. V. Suppression by tones of the click evoked compound action potential in the normal and pathological guinea-pig cochlea and man. Scand. Audiol. 1985; 14: 61–74
   Google Scholar
• Pickles J. O. Frequency threshold curves and simultaneous masking function in single fibers of the guinea pig auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 1984; 14: 245–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodenburg M., Vershuure J., Brocaar M. Comparison of two masking methods. Acustica 1974; 31: 99–106
   Google Scholar
• Rutten W. L.C. The influence of cochlear hearing loss and probe tone level on compound action potential tuning curves in humans. Hear. Res. 1986; 21: 195–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan A. Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976; 59: 1222–1226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs M. B., Abbas P. J. Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1975; 56: 1835–1847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd N. T., Abbas P. J. Compound action-potential tuning curves in normal and acoustically traumatized cats. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1983; 92: 496–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber D. L., Lutfi R. A. The unimportance of suppression. Moore, Patterson, Auditory frequency selectivity. Plenum Press, New York 1986; 371–378
   Google Scholar
• Weber D. L., Patterson R. D. Sinusoidal and noise maskers in simultaneous and forward masking, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984; 75: 925–931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijburg F. A., De Boer E. Time course of suppression. Hear. Res. 1986; 24: 283–286
   Google Scholar