Clinical Pure-Tone versus Three-Interval Forced-Choice Thresholds: Effects of Hearing Level and Age

References

• Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination and pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 220–345
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D E, Watson C S. Psychophysical methods in modern psychoacoustics;. Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory, J V Tobias. Academic Press, New York 1973; vol 2: 99–131
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand S A. Hearing: An introduction to psychological and physiological acoustics. Dekker, New York 1981; 183–206
   Google Scholar
• Burns W, Hinchcliffe R. Comparison of the auditory threshold as measured by pure-tone and by Békésy audiometry. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 1274–1277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J D. Békésy audiometry at 20 frequencies 0.2 to 6 kHz/sec. J Acoust Soc Am 1964; 37: 1954–1955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delany M E, Whittle L A, Knox E C. A note on the use of self-recording audiometry with children. J Laryngol Otol 1966; 80: 1135–1143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erlandsson B, Hakanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson R. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry. Audiology 1979; 18: 414–429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lutman M E, Cane M A, Smith P A. Comparison of manual and computer controlled self-recorded audio-metric methods for serial monitoring of hearing. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 305–315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood T J, Wittich W W, Maheffey R B. Computerised pure-tone audiometric procedures. J Speech Hear Res 1973; 16: 676–684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris D A. Microprocessor, selfrecording and manual audiometry. J Aud Res 1979; 19: 159–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris J D. A comparison of computerised audiometry by ANSI, Békésy fixed frequency, and modified ISO procedures in an industrial hearing conservation programme. J Aud Res 1980; 20: 143–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jervall L, Dryselius H, Arlinger S. Comparison of manual and computer controlled audiometry using identical procedures. Scand Audiol 1983; 12: 209–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallach M A, Kogan N. Aspects of judgement and decision making interrelationships and changes with age. Behav Sci 1961; 6: 23–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botwinick J. Disinclination to venture response vs. cautiousness in responding: Age differences. J Genet Psychol 1969; 15: 55–62
   Google Scholar
• Danzinger W L, Botwinick J. Age and sex differences in sensitivity and response bias in a weight discrimination task. J Gerontol 1980; 35: 388–394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees J N, Botwinick J. Detection and decision factors in auditory behaviour of the elderly. J Gerontol 1971; 26: 133–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potash M, Jones B. Aging and decision criteria for the detection of tones in noise. J Gerontol 1977; 32: 436–440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall L, Jesteadt W. Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 82–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yantz J L, Anderson S M. Comparison of speech perception skills in young and old listeners. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 134–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Johnson K, Jerger S. Effect of response criterion on measures of speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S. Effects of aging on response criteria in speech recognition tasks. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 155–1672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Determinants of self-reported disability in older subjects. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 575–655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Pure-tone audio-metric test methods (ISO/DIS 8253). ISO, Geneva 1984
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. Specification for a reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone audiometers BS2497, Pt 2. Data for certain earphones used in commercial practice. HMSO, London 1969
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Standard reference zero for the calibration of audiometers. ISO R389. ISO, Geneva 1975
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. Specification for a reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone audiometers. BS2497, Pt 4. Normal threshold of hearing for pure tones by bone conduction. HMSO, London 1972
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology/British Association of Otolaryngologists. Recommended procedures for pure-tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981; 15: 213–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M E, Brown E J, Coles R RA. Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex and type of hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 25–58
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck H J, Eysenck H BG. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press, London 1964
   Google Scholar
• Davis A C. The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol 1989; 18: 911–917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. Factors in the benefits from amplification in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990; 476: 262–269, suppl
   Google Scholar
• Davis A C. Epidemiological profile of hearing impairments: The scale and nature of the problem with special reference to the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 476: 23–31, suppl
   Google Scholar
• Gates G A, Cooper J C. Incidence of hearing decline in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 1991; 240–248
   Google Scholar
• Davis A C, Ostri B, Parving A. Longitudinal study of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 476: 12–22, suppl
   Google Scholar