Dependence of Auditory Brainstem Response on Click Polarity and High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss

References

• Ornitz E M, Walter D O. The effect of sound pressure waveform on human brainstem auditory evoked responses. Brain Res 1975; 92: 490–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem responses. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockard J E, Stockard J J, Westmoreland B F, Corfits J L. Brainstem auditory evoked responses. Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 823–831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevanishvili Z, Aphonchenko V. Click polarity inversion effects upon the human brainstem auditory evoked potential. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 141–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E, Löfqvist L. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal and abnormal ears. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 227–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson R G, Brooks E B, Parker S W, Chiappa K H. Effects of click polarity on brainstem auditory evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients: unexpected sensitivity of wave V. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982; 388: 710–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer K. Uncertainties of topodiagnosis of auditory nerve and brainstem auditory evoked potentials due to rarefaction and condensation stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 135–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pijl S. Effects of click polarity on ABR peak latency and morphology in a clinical population. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 89–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salt A N, Thornton A RD. The effects of stimulus rise-time and polarity on the auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 119–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietze G, Pantev C. Comparison between auditory brainstem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks. Audiology 1986; 25: 44–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rawool V, Zerlin S. Phase-intensity effects on the ABR. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 117–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R C. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 99–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard R, Voigt H F. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER). II. Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cut-off frequency across click polarity. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 2526–2536
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoonhoven R, Prijs V F. Cochlear frequency selectivity and brainstem evoked response (BER) dependence on click polarity;. Auditory Pathway -Structure and Function, J Syka, R B Masterton. Plenum Press, New York 1988; 155–161
   Google Scholar
• Brüel and Kjaer. Condenser Microphone Data Handhook. 1982
   Google Scholar
• Liberman M C, Dodds L W. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alteration of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 1984; 16: 55–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prijs V F, Keijzer J, Schoonhoven R, Versnel H. The sting is in the tail;. The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing, P Dallos, C D Geisler, J W Matthews, M A Ruggero, C R Steele. Springer, Berlin 1990; 154–161
   Google Scholar
• Evans E F, Elberling C. Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential. Audiology 1982; 21: 204–227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prijs V F, Eggermont J J. Narrowband analysis of compound action potentials for several stimulus conditions in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1981; 4: 23–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker D J, Thornton A RD. The validity of the derived components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 45–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don M, Eggermont J J. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1084–1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J, Don M. Analysis of click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effects of click intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 1671–1675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thümmler I, Tietze G. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 129–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair I WS, Laukli E. Auditory brainstem response in the cat. Effect of masking level on derived band contributions. Acta Otolaryngol 1987; 103: 586–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N YS. Discharge patterns of single auditory nerve fibers in the cats auditory nerve. Res Monogr 35, MIT Press, Cambridge 1965
   Google Scholar
• Peake W T, Kiang N YS. Cochlear responses to condensation and rarefaction clicks. Biophys J 1962; 2: 23–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller A R. Effect of click spectrum and polarity on round window N1N2 response in the rat. Audiology 1986; 25: 29–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorga M P, Kaminski J R, Beauchaine K L. Effects of stimulus phase on the latency of the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol 1991; 2: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antoli-Candela F, Kiang N YS. Unit activity underlying the N1 potential;. Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, R F Naunton, C Fernandez. Academic Press, New York 1978; 165–191
   Google Scholar
• Gerull G, Mrowinski D, Janssen T, Anft D. Brainstem and cochlea potentials evoked by rarefaction and condensation single-slope stimuli. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 141–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenkman C J, Grote J J, Rutten W LC. Acoustic transfer characteristics in human middle ears studied by a SQUID magnetometer method. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 1646–1654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kringlebotn M, Gundersen T. Frequency characteristics of the middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 159–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M A, Rich N C, Robles L, Shivapuja B G. Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 1612–1629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett D L. The 3-channel Lissajous trajectory of the auditory brainstem response. IX. Theoretical aspects. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 68: 386–408
   Google Scholar
• Sininger Y S, Masuda A. Effect of click polarity on ABR threshold. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 206–209
   Google Scholar