References
- Martin F N, Morris L J. Current audiologie practices in the United States. Hear J 1989; 42: 25–44
- Humes L E. An evaluation of several rationales for selecting hearing aid gain. J Speech Hear Dis 1986; 51: 272–281
- Byrne D. Hearing aid selection formulae: Same or different?. Hear Inst 1987; 38: 5–6, 8,11
- Berger K W. The use of an articulation index to compare three hearing aid prescriptive methods. Audecibel 1990; 39: 16–19
- Berger K W. Results from three prescriptive fitting methods using two modified articulation index procedures. Audecibel 1991; 40: 22–23
- Berger K W, Hagberg E N, Rane R L. Prescription of Hearing Aids. Rationale, Procedures and Results, ed 5. Herald Publishing House, Kent 1989
- Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hearing 1986; 7: 257–265
- McCandless G A, Lyregaard P E. Prescription of gain/output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hear Inst 1983; 1: 16–21
- Byrne D, Tonnison W. Selecting the gain of hearing aids for persons with sensorineural hearing impairments. Scand Audiol 1976; 5: 51–59
- Berger K W, Hagberg E N, Rane R L. Prescription of Hearing Aids. Procedures and Results. Baltimore, Herald Publishing House, Rationale 1977
- Libby E R. State of the art of hearing aid selection procedures. Hear Inst 1985; 1: 30–38, 62
- Hawkins D. Reflections on amplification: Validation of performance. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1985; 18: 42–54