20
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Natural Vowel Perception by Patients with the Ineraid Cochlear Implant

Original Paper

, , &
Pages 228-239 | Received 15 Mar 1991, Accepted 05 Sep 1991, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Blarney P J, Dowell R C, Brown A M, Clark GM. Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant estimating speech processors. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 48–57
  • Miller G A, Nicely PE. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338–352
  • Dent LJ. Vowel discrimination with the single-electrode cochlear implant: A pilot study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1982; 91: 41–46
  • Brinacombe J A, Edgerton B J, Doyle K J, Erratt J D, Danhauer JL. Auditory capabilities of patients implanted with the House single-channel cochlear implant. Acta Otolar-yngol Suppl (Stockh) 1983; 411: 204–216
  • Eddington DK. Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multi-channel intracochlear electrodes. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium, C W Parkins, SW Anderson. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 241–258
  • Tyler R S, Tye-Murray N, Otto SR. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-im-plant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 2107–2112
  • Tyler R S, Tye-Murray N, Moore B CJ, McCabe BF. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. Audiology 1989; 28: 301–315
  • Dorman M F, Dankowski K, McCandless G, Smith L. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Ineraid multi-channel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 40–43
  • Eddington D K, Orth JL. Speech recognition in a deaf subject with a portable, multi-channel cochlear implant system. Cochlear Implants, R A Schindler, MM Merzenich. Raven Press, New York 1985
  • Tye-Murray N, Tyler R S, Wood-worth G G, Gantz BJ. Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear, submitted
  • Waltzman S, Cohen N L, Shapiro WH. Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: 1083–1087
  • Peterson G E, Barney HL. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1952; 24: 175–184
  • Umeda N. Vowel duration in American English. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 434–445
  • Nabelek A K, Letowski TR. Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and non-reverberant conditions. J Speech Hear Disord 1985; 50: 126–131
  • Wang M D, Bilger RC. Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 1248–1266
  • Hazan V, Rosen S. Individual variability in the perception of cues to place contrasts in initial stops. Percept Psychophys 1991; 49: 187–200
  • Dorman M F, Hannley M T, McCandless G A, Smith LM. Auditory/phonetic categorization with the Ineraid multi-channel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 501–510
  • Tong Y C, Lim H H, Clark GM. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 876–887
  • Blarney P J, Clark GM. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 667–673
  • Rosen S, Walliker J, Brimacombe J A, Edgerton BJ. Prosodic and seg-mental aspects of speech perception with the House/3M single-channel implant. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 93–111

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.