Clinical Use of BOBCAT: Testing Reliability and Validity of Computerized Pure-Tone Audiometry with Noise-Exposed Workers, Children and the Aged

References

• Almqvist B., Aurnes J. Computerized pure-tone audiometry. Scand Au-diol. 1978; 193–196, Suppl. 8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANSI. Manual pure-tone audiometry. American National Standards Institute, New York 1978; S3.21
   Google Scholar
• ANSI. Specifications for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York 1989; S3.6
   Google Scholar
• APA. Standards for educational and psychological tests. American Psychological Association, Washington 1974
   Google Scholar
• Aplin D. Y., Rowson V. J. Psychological characteristics of children with functional hearing loss. Br. J. Audiol. 1990; 24: 77–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BNQ. Laboratoire d'examen auditif de depistage en milieu de travail. BNQ 5780.900. Bureau de Normalisation du Quebec, Quebec 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M. Aging and the perception of speech. University Park Press, Baltimore 1980
   Google Scholar
• Bergman M. Central disorders of hearing in the elderly; in Hinchcliffe, Hearing and balance in the elderly. Churchill Livingstone, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Betz N. E., Weiss D. J. Validity; in Bolton, Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976
   Google Scholar
• Bowinick J. Aging and behavior; 2nd ed. Springer, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R. Computer audiometry. J Speech Hear. Res. 1974; 17: 134–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaiklin J. B., Ventry I. M. Functional hearing loss; in Jerger, Modern developments in audiology. Academic Press, New York 1963
   Google Scholar
• Cook G., Creech H. B. Reliability and validity of computer hearing tests. Hear. Instr. 1983; 34: 10–13, 39
   Google Scholar
• Corso J. F. Presbyacusis, hearing aids and aging. Audiology 1977; 16: 146–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desmorest M. E. Psychometric issues in speech recognition testing. ASHA Rep. 1984; 14: 19–22
   Google Scholar
• Eagles E., Whishik S. A study of hearing in children. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthal. Oto-lar. 1961; 65: 261–282
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eagles E. Hearing sensitivity and related factors in children. Laryngoscope, Saint Louis 1963
   Google Scholar
• Fulton R. T. Pure-tone tests of hearing-age one through five years; in Martin, Pediatric audiology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1978
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein B. A., Newman C. Clinical masking: a decision-making process; in Katz, Handbook of clinical audiology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1985
   Google Scholar
• Guilford J. P. Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill, New York 1954
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. A. Microprocessor, self-recording and manual audiometry. J. audit. Res. 1979a; 19: 159–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris D. A. Microprocessor vs self-recording audiometry in industry. J. audit. Res. 1979b; 19: 137–149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris J. D. A comparison of computerized audiometry by ANSI, Bekesy fixed-frequency and modified ISO procedures. J. audit. Res. 1980; 20: 143–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris J. D., Smith P. F. A comparison of a standard and a computerized adaptive paradigm in Bekesy fixed frequency audiometers. J. audit. Res. 1979; 19: 1–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilecki H. J., Dafoe N. BOBCAT: a technical review. Hear. Instr. 1987; 38: 33–38
   Google Scholar
• ISO. Acoustique-audiométrie liminaire tonale en conduction aérienne pour les besoins de la préservation de l'ouïe. ISO 6189. Organisation internationale de normalisation, Genève 1983
   Google Scholar
• ISO. Acoustics-standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone bone conduction audiometers. ISO 7566. Organisation internationale de normalisation, Geneve 1987
   Google Scholar
• Jervall L., Dryselius H., Arlinger S. Comparison of manual and computer-controlled audiometry using identical procedures. Scand. Audiol. 1983; 22: 209–213
   Google Scholar
• Kasten R. Evaluation and fitting of amplification for the aging population; in Henoch, Aural rehabilitation for the elderly. Grune & Stratton, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger F. N. Foundations of behavioral research. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd L. L. Pure-tone audiometry; in Fulton, Lloyd, Hoyt, Auditory assessment of the difficult-to-test. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1975
   Google Scholar
• Marshall L. Audiological assessment of older adults. Semin Hear. 1985; 6: 161–181
   Google Scholar
• Martin F. N., Morris L. J. Current audiologic practices in the US. Hear. J. 1989; 42: 25–44
   Google Scholar
• Martin F. N., Sides D. G. Survey of current audiometrie practices. ASHA 1985; 27: 29–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurer J. F., Rupp R. R. Hearing and aging. Grune & Stratton, New York 1979
   Google Scholar
• Mills J. H. Noise and children. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1975; 58: 767–779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard M., Ilecki H., Baxter J. The microcomputer as a clinical productivity tool in the hearing health care clinic. Proc. Catch 87 1987; 127–130
   Google Scholar
• Picard M., Ilecki H., Baxter J. Essai clinique du BOBCAT: première série de résultats sur la fiabilité et la validité de l'audiométrie tonale informatisée. Audiology 1988; 27: 234–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potash M., Jones B. Aging and decision criteria for the detection of tones in noise. J. Gerontol. 1977; 32: 436–440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees J. N., Botwinick J. Detection and decision factors in auditory behavior of the elderly. J. Gerontol. 1971; 26: 113–136
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D. W. Threshold of hearing as a function of age and sex for the typical unscreened population. Br. J. Audiol. 1988; 22: 5–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakabe N., Hirai Y., Itami E. Modification and application of the computerized audiometer. Scand. Audiol. 1978; 7: 105–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz H. M. Computerized audio-metric systems for hearing conservation programs. Hear. Instr. 1988; 39: 10–12
   Google Scholar
• Sparks D. The feasibility of computerized audiometry. J. audit. Res. 1972; 12: 62–66
   Google Scholar
• Stach B. A. Computers and audiologic instrumentation. Hear. Instr. 1988; 39: 13–16
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike R. M. Reliability; in Bolton, Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976
   Google Scholar
• Trehub S. E., Schneider B. A., Morrongiello B. A., Thorpe L. A. Auditory sensitivity in school-age children. J. exp. Psychol. 1988; 46: 273–285
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay C, Picard M, Barbarosie T, Banville R. Etude clinique des décalages de seuil vocal dans le bruit. Audiology 1991; 30: 212–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Rooij J. C., Plomp R. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989; 86: 1294–1309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WGSUA. Speech understanding and aging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988; 83: 859–895
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilber L. A. Threshold measurement methods; in Rintelman, Hearing assessment. University Park Press, Baltimore 1979
   Google Scholar
• Wood T., Wittich W., Mahaffey B. Computerized pure-tone audiometric procedures. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1973; 16: 676–684
   PubMedGoogle Scholar