11
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Objective Evaluation of Vowel Identification with the Digisonic Cochlear Implant

, , , , , & show all
Pages 23-36 | Received 04 Nov 1994, Accepted 01 Dec 1995, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Tyler R S, Preece J P, Lansing C R, Gantz B J. Natural vowel perception by patients with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Audiology 1992; 31: 228–239
  • Tyler R S, Moore B C J. Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 3068–3077
  • Hand D J. Discrimination and classification. John Wiley, New York 1981
  • Syrdal A K, Gopal H S. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1086–1100
  • Hillenbrand J M, Gayvert R T. Vowel classification based on fundamental frequency and formant frequencies. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 694–700
  • Papcun G. Discriminant analyses of four imitation dialects. UCLA WPP. Feb, 1980; 48
  • Peterson G E, Barney H L. Control methods used in a study of vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1952; 24: 175–184
  • Malmberg B. La structure phonétique de quelques langues romanes; in Phonétique Générate et Romane. Mouton, The Hague-Paris 1971; 301–342
  • MXM Inc. Programmation de I'im-plant cochleaire Digisonic DX10– Notice d'utilisation du logiciel PDX10. MXM Labs, AntibesFrance 1993
  • SPSS Inc. SPSS for windows–Advanced statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York 1992
  • McCullagh P, Nelder J A. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London 1983
  • Delattre P. Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. Julius Gross Verlag, Heidelberg 1965
  • Boe L -J, Perrier P, Bailly G. The geometric vocal tract variables controlled for vowel production: Proposals for constraining acoustic-to-articulatory inversion. J Phonet. 1992; 20: 27–38
  • Davis S B, Mermelstein P. Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Processing 1980; ASSP 28: 357–365
  • Miller G A, Nicely P E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338–352
  • Boë L -J, Contini M, Rakotofiringa H. Etude statistique de la fréquence laryngienne–Application à l'analyse et à la synthèse des faits prosodiques du francais. Phonetica 1975; 32: 1–23
  • Fant G. Analysis and synthesis of speech processes. Manual of Phonetics., B Malmberg. North-Holland, Amsterdam 1968; 173–277
  • Ladefoged P, Broadbent D E. Infomation conveyed by vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1957; 29: 98–104
  • Serniclaes W (1972) L'influence de la duree sur l'ajustement du cadre vocalique interne. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Montreal, 1971, A Rigault, R Charbonneau. Mouton, The Hague, 603–607
  • Picheny M A, Durlach N I, Braida L D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 96–103
  • Gottfried T L. Effects of consonant context on the perception of French vowels. J Phonet. 1984; 12: 91–114
  • Sussman H M, McCaffrey H A, Matthews S A. An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 1309–1325

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.