The Effects of Cochlear Hearing Loss, Age and Sex on the Auditory Brainstem Response

References

• Selters W A, Brackman D E. Acoustic tumor detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 181–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappa K H. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine: Pattern shift visual, brainstem auditory and short-latency somatosensory: Techniques, correlations and interpretations. Raven Press, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• Moller M B, Moller E R. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 645–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser S, Arslan E. Prediction of auditory brainstem wave V latency as a diagnostic tool of sensorineural loss. Audiology 1987; 26: 179–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, Johnson G D, Gollegly K M, Josey A F, Glasscock M E. The auditory brain stem interaural latency difference (1LDJ in patients with brain stem lesions. Ear Hear 1989; 10(2)131–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, Mueller R, Kibbe K, Rackliffe L. Audiologic test selection in the detection of eighth nerve disorders. Am J Otol 1983; 4: 281–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swan I R, Gatehouse S. Clinical and financial audit of diagnostic protocols for lesions of the cerebellopontine angle. Br Med J 1991; 302(6778)701–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhamer H J, Lindstrom B, Lundborg T. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. III. Latencies in cochlear hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 3–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhamer H J. Auditory evoked brainstem electric response (ABR) in cochlear hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1981; 83–94, Suppl. 13
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhall U, Pedersen K, Dotevall M. Effects of presbyacusis and other types of hearing loss on the auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1986; 15: 179–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M L. Effects of cochlear lesions on the ABR. The Auditory Brainstem Response (1st Ed.)., J Jacobsen. College-Hill Press, San Diego 1985; 33–48
   Google Scholar
• Bauch C D, Olsen W O. The effect of 2000–4000 Hz hearing sensitivity on ABR results. Ear Hear 1986; 7(5)314–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashman M Z, Stanton S G, Sagle C, Barber H O. The effect of hearing loss on the ABR interpretation Use of correction factor. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 153–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A C. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 709–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses Effect of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Parbo J. Reference data for ABRs in retrocochlear diagnosis. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 49–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Johnson K. Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on the ABR latency. Ear Hear 1988; 9(4)168–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzebecher E, Werbs M. Influence of age, sex and hearing loss on auditory brainstem response (ABR) latencies. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 248–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P, Stapells D R. Intercation of click intensity and cochlear hearing loss on the auditory brain stem response wave V latency. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 28–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith W J, Greville K A. Effects of audiometric configuration on the auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 49–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Mauldin L. Predictions of sensorineural hearing level from the brainstem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 456–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada D, Kodera K, Yagi T. Cochlear processes affecting wave V latency of the auditory evoked brainstem response: A study of patients with sensory hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1979; 8: 67–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arslan E, Prosser S, Rosignoli M. The behaviour of wave V latency in cochlear hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1988; 105: 467–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot G R. Correcting for factors affecting ABR wave V latency. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 211–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M L, Blair R L. The auditory brainstem response in neuro-otology: perspectives and problems. J Otolaryngol. 1981; 10: 117–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cashman M Z, Rossman R N. Diagnostic features of the auditory brainstem response in identifying cerebellopontine angle tumours. Scand. Audiol. 1983; 12: 35–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauch C D, Rose D, Harner S G. Auditory brainstem response results from 255 patients with suspected retrocochlear involvement. Ear Hear. 1982; 3: 83–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington D W, Peters J F. Electrophysiologic audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89 (Suppl.74): 59–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser S, Arslan E, Pastore A. Auditory brainstem response and hearing threshold in cerebellopontine angle tumors. Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 1984; 239: 183–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pijl S. Effects of click polarity on ABR peak latency and morphology in a clinical population. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 89–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoonhaven R. Dependence of auditory brainstem response on click polarity and high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1992; 31: 72–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maurer K. Uncertainties of topodiagnosis of auditory nerve and brainstem auditory evoked potentials due to rarefaction and condensation stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 135–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall J W. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights 1992
   Google Scholar
• Beagley H A, Sheldrake J B. Differences in brainstem response latency with age and sex. Br J Audiol 1979; 12: 69–77
   Google Scholar
• Rosenhall (J, Bjorkman G, Pedersen K, Kail A. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in different age groups. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 426–430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturzebecher E, Werbs M. Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 153–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J, Hall J. Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response. Arch Otolaryngol 1980; 106: 387–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu N. Age-related latency changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 431–436
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allison T, Wood C, Goff W. Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, brain and body size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 59: 619–636
   Google Scholar
• Otto W C, McCandless G A. Aging and the auditory brainstem response. Audiology 1982; 21: 466–473
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stockard J E, Stockard J J. Recording and Analyzing. Bases of auditory brainstem evoked responses (1st Ed.)., EJ Moore. Grune and Stratton, New York 1983; 255–286
   Google Scholar
• Ottaviani F, Maurizi M, D'Alatri L, Almadori G. Auditory brainstem responses in the aged. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 110–113, Suppl 476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller M B. Hearing in 70 and 75 year of people: results from a cross-sectional and longitudinal population study. Am J Otolaryngol 1981; 2: 22–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ISO 7029. Acoustics-Thresholds of hearing by air conduction as a function of age and sex for otologically normal persons. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva 1987
   Google Scholar
• Don M, Eggermont J J. Analysis of click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 1084–1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M, Eggermont J J, Brackman D E. Reconstruction of the audiogram using brainstem responses and high-pass noise masking. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88: Suppl 57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedderson J. SPSSx Made Simple. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont 1987
   Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P, Huis in't Veld F. Far field electro-cochleography: Frequency specificity of the response. Scand Audiol 1975; 4: 167–172
   Google Scholar
• Gorga M P, Worthington D, Reiland J, Beauchaine K, Goldgar D. Some comparisons between auditory brainstem response thresholds, latencies and pure-tone audiogram. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J, Don M, Brackman D E. Electrocochleography and auditory brainstem electric responses in patients with pontine angle tumours. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89: l-19, (suppl75)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell C, Phillips D S, Trune D R. Variables affecting the auditory brainstem response. Audiogram, age, gender and head size. Hear Res 1989; 40: 75–86
   Google Scholar