Speechreading Supplemented with Auditorily Presented Speech Elements in the Profoundly Hearing Impaired

References

• Faulkner A, Rosen S, Moore B CJ. Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 381–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faulkner A, Fourcin A J, Moore B CJ. Psychoacoustic aspects of speech pattern coding for the deaf. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990; 172–180, Suppl. 469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen S, Faulkner A, Smith D AJ. The psychoacoustics of profound hearing impairment. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990; 101–107, Suppl. 469
   Google Scholar
• Son N van, Bosman A J, Lamore P JJ, Smoorenburg G F. The perception of complex harmonic patterns by profoundly hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 1993; 32: 308–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faulkner A, Ball V, Rosen S, Moore B CJ. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 2136–2155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeuwer M. Speechreading supplemented with auditory information. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Free University of Amersterdam. 1985
   Google Scholar
• Breeuwer M, Plomp R. Speechreading supplemented with formant-frequency information from voiced speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 314–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K W. Encoding voice pitch for profoundly hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 423–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tasell D J, Soli S D, Kirby V M, Widin G P. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 1152–1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A, Hnath-Chisolm T, Hanin L, Kishon-Rabin L. Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 306–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcin A J. Prospects for speech pattern element aids. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1990; 257–267, Suppl. 469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hnath-Chisolm T, Boothroyd A. Speechreading enhancement by voice fundamental frequency: the effects of Fo-contour distortions. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1160–1168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coninx F, Vermeulen A, Zierhofer C. A pilot experiment on the effects of an acoustically applied reduced speech signal on speechreading. Scand Audiol 1993; 136–144, Suppl 38
   Google Scholar
• Son N van, Bosman A J, Lamore P JJ, Smoorenburg G F. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes. Scand. Audiol 1993; 111–123, Suppl 38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breeuwer M Plomp R. Speechreading supplemented with frequency-selective sound-pressure information. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 686–691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breeuwer M, Plomp R. Speechreading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 481–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAulay R J, Quatieri T F. Speech analysis/synthesis based on a sinusoidal representation. IEEE ASSP 1986; 34: 744–754
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H, Bakke M, Kates J, Neuman A, Schwander T, Weiss M. Signal processing for hearing impairment. Scand Audiol 1993; 7–19, Suppl. 38
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. An introduction to the psychology of hearing. Academic Press, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg G F. Speech processing for the profoundly hearing impaired. Rehabilitation technology- proceedings of the 1st TIDE congress, E. Ballabio, I. Placencia-Porrero, R. Puig de la Bellacasa. IOS Press, Amsterdam 1993; 113–117
   Google Scholar
• Moser L M. Das Wurzburger Horfeld ein Test fur prothetische Audiometrie. Hals Nase Ohr 1987; 35: 318–321
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaij JL van. De audiosignaal-processor: eigenschappen en technische omschrijving. Report 1–4, TNO Institute for Perception. Soesterberg, The Netherlands (in Dutch) 1986
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R, Mimpen A M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pyfers L, Smoorenburg G F, Frowein H, Huiskamp T, Schinkel D. Video-telephony for the hard of hearing: Effects of picture quality and size on visual speech reception. Internal Report Lab. of Exp. Audiology, University Hospital Utrecht. 1989
   Google Scholar
• Fransen J A, Bosman A J, Smoorenburg G F, Frowein H, Koenen R, Schinkel D. Videotelephony for the hard of hearing: Effects of asynchrony between audio and video signals on speech reception. Internal Report Lab. of Exp. Audiology, University Hospital Utrecht. 1992
   Google Scholar
• Entropic. Entropic Signal Processing System (ESPS). Manual for user-level programs and technical memoranda. Entropic Speech Inc., Washington, DC 1991
   Google Scholar
• Secrest B G, Doddington G R. An integrated pitch tracking algorithm for speech systems. ICASSP 1983; 83: 1352–1355, Boston
   Google Scholar
• McGrath M, Summerfield Q. Inter-modal timing relations and audiovisual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 678–685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. The timecourse and magnitude of perceptual acclimatisation to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 93: 1258–1268
   Google Scholar
• Lamore P JJ, Verweij C, Brocaar M P. Investigations of the residual hearing capacity of severely hearing-impaired and profoundly deaf subjects. Audiology 1985; 24: 343–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg G F. Evaluation of three pitch tracking algorithms. Acta Acustica 1996, in press
   Google Scholar