References
- American Speech and Hearing Association. On the definition of hearing handicap. Asha 1981; 23: 293–297.
- Noble W, Hetu R. An ecological approach to disability and handicap in relation to impaired hearing. Audiology 1994; 33: 117–126
- Fratalli C M, Thompson C M, Holland A L, Wohl C B, Ferketic MM. ASHA FACS. A functional outcome measure for adults. Asha 1995; 37: 41–46
- Von Wedel H, Bottinger M. Screening and assessment of the ‘Social Hearing Ability’ in patients using hearing aids. Audiologische Akustik/Audiological Acoustics 1983; 22: 134–149
- King P F, Coles R RA, Lutman M E, Robinson D W. Assessment of hearing disability: guidelines for medicolegal practice. Whurr, London 1992
- Lutman M E, Robinson D W. Quantification of hearing disability for medicolegal purposes based on self-rating. Br J Audiol 1992; 26: 297–306
- Hargus S E, Gordon-Salant S. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 234–243
- Tyler R S, Baker L J, Armstrong-Bednall G. Difficulties experienced by hearing-aid candidates and hearing-aid users. Br J Audiol 1983; 17: 191–201
- Lutman M E, Brown E J, Coles R RA. Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure tone threshold, age, sex and type of hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 45–58
- Humes L E, Watson B U, Christensen L A, Cokely C G, Hailing D C, Lee L. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly Speech. Hear Res 1994; 37: 465–474
- Jerger S, Jerger J. Quantifying auditory handicap. Audiology 1979; 18: 225–237
- Schow R L, Brockett J, Sturmak M J, Longhurst T M. Self-assessment of hearing in rehabilitative audiology: developments in the USA. Br J Audiol 1989; 23: 13–24
- Habib R G, Hinchcliffe R. Subjective magnitude of auditory impairment. Audiology 1978; 17: 68–76
- Haggard M P, Lindblad A C, Foster J R. Pyschoacoustical and audiometric prediction of auditory disability for different frequency responses at listener-adjusted presentation levels. Audiology 1986; 25: 277–298
- Day G A, Browning G, Gatehouse S. An audiovisual test of hearing disability using free field sentences in noise. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 179–182
- Plomp R, Mimpen A M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
- Rietveld T, Van Hout R. Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behaviour. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 1993
- Hinkle D E, Wiersma W, Jurs S G. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Houghton Mifflin, Boston 1988
- Hallberg L RM, Carlsson S G. Hearing impairment coping and perceived hearing handicap in middle-aged subjects with acquired hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1991; 25: 323–330
- Summerfield Q. Audiovisual speech perception, lipreading and artificial stimulation. Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders., M E Lutman, MP Haggard. Academic Press, London 1983; 131–182
- Macrae J H, Bridgen D N. Auditory threshold impairment and everyday speech reception. Audiology 1973; 12: 272–290
- Studebaker G A, Sherbecoe R L. Frequency-importance functions for speech recognition. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance., G A Studebaker, I (eds). Hockberg. Allyn and Bacon, Boston 1993; 185–204