Electrically Evoked Auditory Middle Latency Responses versus Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users

References

• Shallop J K. Objective electrophysiological measures from cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen P AP, Makhdoum M, Van den Brink J L, Stollman M HP, Snik A FM, Van den Broek P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stock), in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas P J, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem response. growth of response with current level. Hear Res 1991; 51: 123–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen P, Snik A, Van den Broek P. On the clinical relevance of the mismatch negativity: Results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users. Audiol Neuro-Otol 1996; 1: 112–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall JW. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Allyn and Brown, Needham Heights 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N, McGee T, Stein L. The auditory middle latency response. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked potentials., JT Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights 1994; 155–178
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto R T. Electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant subjects. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: 178–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J M. Physiologic measures of electrically evoked auditory system responsiveness: effects of pathology and electrical stimulation. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 28–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardi J N. Human brain stem and middle latency responses to electrical stimulation: preliminary observations. Cochlear Implants., R A Schindler, MM Merzenich. Raven Press, New York 1985; 351–363
   Google Scholar
• Fifer R C, Sierra-Irizarry B. Clinical applications of the auditory middle latency response. Am J Otol 1988; 9(suppl.)47–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shallop J K, Beiter A L, Goin D W, Mischke R E. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the Nucleus multi-channel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 5–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kileny P R, Kemink J L. Electrically evoked middle-latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113: 1072–1077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson P W, Blarney P J, Rowland L C. Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 401417
   Google Scholar
• Waltzman S B, Cohen N L, Shapiro W H. Use of a multi-channel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 395–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinderink J B, Mens L HM, Brokx J PL, Van den Broek P. Performance of prelingually versus postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 618–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N, McGee T. Electrophysiology of the human auditory system. The Mammalian Auditory System: Electro-physiology., A Popper, R Fay. Springer Verlag, New York 1992; 335403
   Google Scholar
• Brugge J. An overview of central auditory processing. The Mammalian Auditory System: Electrophysiology., A Popper, R Fay. Springer Verlag, New York 1992; 1–33
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N, McGee T. Clinical implications of primary and nonprimary pathway contributions to the middle latency response generating system. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 36–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N, Kileny P, McGee T. Middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Handbook of Clinical Audiology., J Katz. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 387405
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson G P, Newman C W. The decomposition of the middle latency auditory evoked potential (MLAEP) Pa component into superficial and deep source contributions. Brain Topogr 1990; 2: 229–236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kileny P R, Paccioretti D, Wilson A F. Effects of cortical lesions on middlelatency auditory evoked responses (MLR). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 66: 108–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liegeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Chauvel P. Localization of the primary auditory area in man. Brain 1991; 114: 139–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro D W. Understanding language: An information-processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. Academic Press, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Mens L HM, Oostendorp T F, Van den Broek P. Identifying electrode failures with cochlear implant generated surface potentials. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 330–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Borne B, Mens L HM, Snik A FM, Spies T H, Van den Broek P. Stapedius reflex and EABR thresholds in experienced users of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stock) 1994; 114: 141–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner M W, Holden L K, Holden T A, Demorest M E. Comparison of procedures for obtaining thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels with the Nucleus cochlear implant system. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 677–689
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van den Broek P. Cochlear Implants 1991-1994; Eindverslag van het ontwikkelingsgeneeskundeproject: Selectie van volwassen doven voor elektrische binnenoorprothese (cochlear implant) en evaluatie van de met deze prothese verkregen resultaten. University Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Institute for the Deaf, St. Michiels-gestel. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Owens E, Kessler D, Raggio M. Analysis and revision of the Minimal Auditory Capabilities (MAC) battery. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 280–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S, Preece J P, Lowder M W. The Iowa cochlear implant test battery. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 1983
   Google Scholar
• Walpole R E. Introduction to statistics. Macmillan, New York 1982
   Google Scholar