References
- Waltzman S B, Cohen N L, Shapiro W H. Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage. Laryngoscope 1986; 96: 1083–1087
- Dorman M F, Hannley M T, Dankowski K, Smith L, McCandless G. Word recognition by 50 patients fitted with the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 44–49
- Dowel R C, Mecklenburg D J, Clark G M. Speech recognition for 40 patients receiving multichannel cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 112: 1054–1059
- Tye-Murray N, Tyler R S. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 292–298
- Tye-Murray N, Tyler R S, Woodworth G G, Gantz B J. Performance over time with a Nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 200–209
- Brown A M, Clark G M, Dowell R C, Martin L FA, Seligman P M. Telephone use by a multi-channel cochlear implant patient. J Laryngol Otol 1985; 99: 231–238
- Cohen N L, Waltzman S B, Shapiro W H. Telephone speech comprehension with use of the nucleus cochlear implant. Ann of Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989, Supp 142;98, No8, Part 2:8–11
- Brimaeombe J A, Beiter A L, Barker M J, Mikami K A, O'Meilia R M, Shallop J K. Speech recognition abilities over the telephone for Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant recipients. Cochlear Implant. Acquisitions and Controversies, B Fraysse, N Cochard. Impasse La Caussade, ToulouseFrance 1989; 345–359
- Martin E L, Burnett P A, Himelick T E, Phillips MA, Over S K. Speech recognition by a deaf-blind multichannel cochlear implant patient. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 70–74
- Ramsden R, Boyd P, Giles E, Aplin Y, Hesketh A. Cochlear implantation of the deaf-blind. Hochmair IJ, Hochmair ES. Advances on Cochlear Implants. Manz, Wien 1994; 447–451
- Clark GM. The University of Melbourne-Nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 1987; 38: 1–189
- Shindler R A, Kessler D K. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 1006–1013
- Hochmair-Desoyer I J, Hochmair E S, Burian K, Stiglbrunner HK. Percepts from the Vienna cochlear prosthesis. Cochlear Prostheses: An International Symposium, C W Parkins, S W Anderson. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1983; 405: 295–306
- Lawson D T, Wilson B S, Finley C C. New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. Progress in Brain Research, J HJ Allum, D J Allum-Mecklenburg, F P Harris, R Probst. Elsevier Science Publishers BV. 1993; 97: 313–321
- Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Zerbi M, Finley C C. Recent developments with the CIS strategies. Advances in Cochlear Implants., I J Hochmair-Desoyer, E S Hochmair. Wien, Manz 1994; 103–112
- De Filippo C L, Scott B L. A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. J Acoust SocAm 1978; 63(4)186–92
- Mastroianni S, Aronson L. Bateria de Habilidad Auditiva (BATHA): programa de selection y rehabilitaci6n para pacientes con implante coclear. Otolaringologica 1988; XV: 13–56.
- Brik G, Pallares N. Adaptacion al castellano de la bateria ESP para evaluar la perception del habla en niiios con hipoacusia profunda. Fonoaudiologica 1993; 39(1)