Modality Specificity of Auditory and Visual Pattern Recognition: Implications for the Assessment of Central Auditory Processing Disorders

References

• McFarland D J, Cacace A T. Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. Am J Audiol 1995; 4: 32–44
   Google Scholar
• Jerger S, Johnson K, Loiselle I. Pediatric central auditory dysfunction: Comparison of children with confirmed lesions versus suspected processing disorders. Am J Otolaryngol 1988; 9: 63–71, (Suppl)
   Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Lowe S S. Temporal and dichotic factors in central auditory testing. Handbook of clinical audiology., Katz J. Williams & Wilkins., Baltimore 1972; 280–312
   Google Scholar
• Hood L J, Berlin C I. Central auditory function and disorders. Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 7: Child neuropsychology, SJ Segalowitz, I Rapin, F Boiler, J Grafman. Elsevier Science Publishers. 1992; 33–49
   Google Scholar
• Johnson D M, Watson C S, Jensen J K. Individual differences in auditory capabilities. I. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: 427–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson B U, Miller T K. Auditory perception, phonological processing, and reading ability/disability. J Speech Hearing Res 1993; 36: 850–863
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broadbent D E. Perception and communication. Pergamon, London 1958
   Google Scholar
• Treisman A M, Davies A. Divided attention to ear and eye. Attention and performance IV., S Kornblum. Academic Press., New York 1973; 101–106
   Google Scholar
• Wickens C D. Processing resources in attention. Varieties of attention., R Parasuraman, DR Davies. Academic Press., New York 1984; 63–102
   Google Scholar
• Wickens C D. Processing resources and attention. Multiple-task performance., DL Damos. Taylor and Francis., London 1991; 3–34
   Google Scholar
• Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 1994; 116: 220–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. Working memory. Clarendon Press., Oxford 1986
   Google Scholar
• Logie R H, Zucco G M, Baddeley A D. Interference with visual short-term memory. Acta Psychol 1990; 75: 55–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A. The psychology of memory. Basic Books., New York 1976
   Google Scholar
• Harris F J. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acousti Speech Signal Process. 1978; 66: 51–83
   Google Scholar
• Cacace A T, McFarland D J, Emrich J, Haller J S. Assessing short-term recognition memory with forced-choice psychophysical methods. J Neurosci Methods. 1992; 44: 145–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland D J, Cacace A T. Aspects of short-term acoustic recognition memory: Modality and serial position effects. Audiology. 1992; 31: 342–352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green D M, Swets J A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley., New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F E. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994; 5: 256–268
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, Pinheiro M L. Frequency patterns in cochlear brainstem and cerebral lesions. Audiology. 1987; 26: 79–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland D J, Cacace A T. Comparisons of memory for nonverbal auditory and visual sequential stimuli. Psychol Res. 1995; 57: 80–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tattersall A J, Broadbent D E. Output buffer storage and the modality of recall. Q J Exp Psychol. 1991; 43: 1–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace A T, McFarland D J. Acoustic pattern recognition and short-term memory in normal adults and young children. Audiology. 1992; 31: 334–341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demster F N. Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental differences. Psychol Bull. 1981; 89: 63–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner W R, Gottwald R L. The perception and learning of temporal patterns. Q J Exp Psychol. 1968; 20: 97–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loring D W, Meador K J, Lee G P. Differential-handed response to verbal and visual spatial stimuli: evidence of specialized hemispheric processing following callosotomy. Neuropsychologia. 1989; 27: 811–827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E N, Fujioka T A, Chapman L J, Chapman J P. Psychometrically matched tasks for assessment of hemispheric asymmetries of function. Brain Cognition. 1995; 28: 1–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintern G, Wickens C D. Issues for acquisition and transfer of timesharing and dual-task skills. DL Damos, ed, Multiple-task performance. Taylor and Francis., London 1991; 12–138
   Google Scholar
• Brookings J B, Damos D L. Individual differences in multiple task performance. Multiple-task performance., DL Damos. Taylor and Francis., London 1991; 363–386
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta M, Miezin F M, Dobmeyer S, Shulman G L, Petersen S E. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 2382–2402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder J R, Rao S M, Hammeke T A, Frost J A, Bandettini P A, Jesmanowicz A, Hyde J S. Lateralized human brain language systems demonstrated by task subtraction functional magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol. 1995; 52: 593–601
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damasio A R. Time-locked multi-regional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition. 1989; 33: 25–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeck M, Schomer D, Mainwaring N, Ives J I, Dubuisson D, Blume H, Cosgrove R, Ransil B J, Mesulam M-M. Selectively distributed processing of visual object recognition in the temporal and frontal lobes of the human brain. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 538–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J, Smith P S. The staggered spondaic word test: A ten-minute look at the central nervous system through the ears. Windows on the brain: Neuropsychology's technological frontiers, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, RA Zappulla, FF LeFever, J Jaeger, R Biider. New York Academy of Sciences, New York 1991; 620: 233–251
   Google Scholar
• Noffsinger D, Martinez C D, Wilson R H. Dichotic listening to speech: background and preliminary data for digits sentences and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994; 5: 248–254
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Efron R. The decline and fall of hemispheric specialization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., New Jersey 1990
   Google Scholar