References
- Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustics Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257–265
- McCandless G A, Lyregaard P E. Prescription of gain/output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hear Instr 1983; 34: 16–21
- Berger K W, Hagberg E N, Rane R L. Prescription of Hearing Aids. Rationale, Procedures and Results. 5th ed. Herald Publishing House, Kent 1989
- Hamill T A, Barron T P. Frequency response differences of four gain-equalised hearing aid prescription formulae. Audiology 1992; 31: 87–94
- Ringdahl A, Erikson-Mangold M, Israelsson B, Lindkvist A, Mangold S. Clinical trials with a programmable hearing aid set for various listening environments. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 235–242
- Plomp R, Mimpen M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
- Festen J M, Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1725–1736
- Van Buuren R A, Festen J M, Plomp R. Evaluation of a wide spread of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 211–221
- Verschuure J, Van Benthem P PG. Effect of hearing aids on speech perception in noisy situations. Audiology 1992; 31: 205–221
- Goverts STh, Kapteyn ThS, Festen JM. Evaluation of fitting rules with a programmable hearing aid. Proceedings of the European Conference on Audiology. Ned Ver v Audiologie, Leiden 1995; 149–152