Multiple Auditory Steady-state Responses (MASTER): Stimulus and Recording Parameters

References

• Regan D. Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1989; 34–43, 70-134 and 275-278
   Google Scholar
• Rickards F W, Clark G M. Steady state evoked potentials to amplitude-modulated tones. Evoked Potentials 11, R H Nodar. Butterworth, Boston 1984; 163–168
   Google Scholar
• Galambos R, Makeig S, Talmachoff P J. A 40 Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1981; 78: 2643–2647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D R, Linden D, Suffield J B, Hamel G, Picton T W. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauman R, Szyfter W, Charlet de Sauvage R, Cazals Y. Low frequency thresholds assessed with 40 Hz MLR in adults with impaired hearing. Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 1984; 240: 85–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez R, Picton T, Linden D, Hamel G, Laframboise G. Human auditory steady state responses: Effects of intensity and frequency. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 300–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden R D, Campbell K B, Hamel G, Picton T W. Human auditory steady state evoked potentials during sleep. Ear Hear 1985; 6: 167–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Chmiel R, Frost J D, Jr, Coker N. Effect of sleep on the auditory steady state evoked potential. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 240–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madler C, Pöppel E. Auditory evoked potentials indicate the loss of neuronal oscillations during general anaesthesia. Naturwissenschaften 1987; 74: 42–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde G, Picton T W. Human auditory steady-state responses during general anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg 1990; 71: 460–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D R, Galambos R, Costello J A, Makeig S. Inconsistency of auditory middle latency and steady-state responses in infants. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 289–295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen L T, Rickards F W, Clark G M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust SocAm 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi E C, Folsom R C, Dobie R A. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res 1993; 68: 42–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Furuse H, Fuse T, Suzuki Y, Yokota S, Koike Y. Puretone threshold prediction by 80 Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol (Suppl) 1994; 511: 7–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton P E, Picton T W, Champagne S C, Durieux-Smith A. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80–110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 3051–3063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M, Yoshinori K, Suzuki Y, Fuse T, Koike Y. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 1993; 65: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards F W, Tan L E, Cohen L T, Wilson O J, Drew J H, Clark G M. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994; 28: 327–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G, Rickards F W, Cohen L T, De Vidi S, Clark G M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton T W, Boucher B, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne S C, Moran L M, Perez-Abalo M C, Martin V, Savio G. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D, Cartwright R F. A method for measuring the potentials evoked by simultaneous stimulation of different retinal regions. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 28: 314–319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T W, Skinner C R, Champagne S C, Kellett A JC, Maiste A C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 165–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan D, Regan M P. The transducer characteristics of the hair cells in the human inner ear: A possible objective measure. Brain Res 1988; 438: 363–365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O G, Picton T W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regan M P. Linear half-wave rectification of modulated sinusoids. Appl Math Comput 1994; 62: 61–79
   Google Scholar
• Wei W WS. Time Series Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate Methods. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA 1990; 256–287
   Google Scholar
• Zurek P M. Detectability of transient and sinusoidal otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 307–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 2236–2246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes J L, Perez Abalo M C, Martin V, Savio G, Sierra C, Rodriguez E, Lins O. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady state responses. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 420–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor J D, Mast J. A new statistic for steady state evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 378–388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R A, Wilson M J. Objective response detection in the frequency domain. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 88: 516–524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robles L, Ruggero M A, Rich N C. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. J. Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80: 1364–1374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur R M, Pfeiffer R R, Suga N. Properties of two-tone inhibition in primary auditory neurones. J Physiol 1971; 212: 593–609
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris D M. Action potential suppression, tuning curves and thresholds: comparison with single fiber data. Hear Res 1979; 1: 133–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper N P. Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 3087–3098
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egan J P, Hake H W. On the masking pattern of a simple auditory stimulus. J Acoust Soc Am 1950; 22: 622–630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. Frequency analysis and masking. Handbook of Perception and Cognition Hearing, 2nd ed., B CJ Moore. Academic Press, New York 1995; 161–205
   Google Scholar
• Dallos P. Nonlinear distortion. The Auditory Periphery. Academic Press, New York 1973; 391–464
   Google Scholar
• Green D M. An Introduction to Hearing. Wiley, New York 1976; 182–184, and 235-252
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Chertoff M E, Burkard R. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2225–2234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgutte B. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: Observations from auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 791–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgutte B. Physiological models for basic auditory percepts. Auditory Computation, H L Hawkins, T A McMullen, A N Popper, R R Fay. New York, Springer 1996; 157–220
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Mountain D C. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 3215–3226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode W S, Robles L. Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 588–596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates G K. Cochlear structure and function. Hearing. Handbook of Perception and Cognition, 2nd ed., B CJ Moore. Academic Press, New York 1995; 41–74
   Google Scholar
• Russell I J, Sellick P M. Intracellular studies of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. J Physiol 1978; 284: 261–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patuzzi R, Sellick P M. A comparison between basilar membrane and inner hair cell receptor potential input-output functions in the guinea pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 1734–1741
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rupert A, Moushegian G, Galambos R. Unit response to sound from auditory nerve of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1963; 26: 449–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomoto M, Suga N, Satsuki Y. Discharge pattern and inhibition of primary auditory nerve fibers in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 1964; 27: 768–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saehs M B, Kiang NY-S. Two-tone inhibition in auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 43: 1120–1128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggero M A. Physiology and coding of sound in the auditory nerve. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, A N Popper, R R Fay. Springer Verlag, New York 1992; 34–93
   Google Scholar
• Kiang NY-S, Watanabe T, Thomas E C, Clark L F. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. MIT Monograph No. 35., MIT Press, Cambridge 1965
   Google Scholar
• Zurek P M, Rabinowitz W M, 5,413,114, 1995, System for testing adequacy of human hearing. United States Patent May 9
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F. The envelope following response to multi-envelope component stimuli. Audiology 1996; 35: 113
   Google Scholar
• Møller A R. Response of units in the cochlear nucleus to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Exp Neurol 1974; 45: 104–107
   Google Scholar
• Frisina R D, Smith R L, Chamberlain S C. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear Res 1990; 44: 99–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisina R D, Smith R L, Chamberlain S C. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: II. Possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1990; 44: 123–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode W S, Greenberg S. Physiology of the cochlear nuclei. The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, A N Popper, R R Fay. Springer Verlag, New York 1992; 94–152
   Google Scholar
• Langner G, Schreiner C E. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 1988; 60: 1799–1822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuss A, Muller-Preuss P. Processing of amplitude-modulated sounds in the medial geniculate body of squirrel monkeys. Exp Brain Res 1990; 79: 207–211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiang N YS, Liberman M C, Levine R A. Auditory-nerve activity in cats exposed to ototoxic drugs and high intensity sounds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85: 752–768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P, Harris D. Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1978; 41: 365–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D R, Picton T W, Durieux-Smith A. Electrophysiologic measures of frequency-specific auditory function. Principles and Applications of Auditory Evoked Potentials, J T Jacobson. Allyn and Bacon, New York 1993; 251–283
   Google Scholar