Modulation Detection by Normal and Hearing-impaired Listeners

References

• Rose J E, Bruge J F, Anderson D J, Hind J E. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 1967; 30: 769–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer A R, Russell I J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hear Res 1986; 24: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Die Grenzen der Hörbarkeit der Amplitudenmodulation und der Frequenzmodulation eines Tones. Acustica 1952; 3: 125–133
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann W M, Hnath G M. Detection of mixed modulation. Acustica 1982; 50: 297–312
   Google Scholar
• Ozimek E, Sek A. Perception of amplitude and frequency modulated signals (mixed modulation). J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 1598–1603
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwicker E. Die elementaren Grundlagen zur Bestimmung der Informationskapazität des Gehörs. Acustica 1956; 6: 356–381
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear's frequency analysis. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing, R Plomp, G Smoorenburg. Sijthoff, Leiden 1970; 376–394
   Google Scholar
• Florentine M, Buus S. An excitation-pattern model for intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70: 1646–1654
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Sek A. Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 3119–3131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Sek A. Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 741–751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demany L, Semal C. On the detection of amplitude modulation and frequency modulation at low modulation frequencies. Acustica 1986; 61: 243–255
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Sek A. Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation). J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 2468–2478
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards B W, Viemeister N F. Frequency modulation versus amplitude modulation discrimination: Evidence for a second frequency modulation encoding mechanism. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 733–739
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Sek A. Discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation or frequency modulation) with and without background noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 726–732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Sek A. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: Evidence for a mechanism based on phase-locking. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 2320–2331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. Oxford University Press. 1995
   Google Scholar
• Woolf N K, Ryan A F, Bone R C. Neural phase-locking properties in the absence of cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 1981; 4: 335–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R V, Evans E F. Some aspects of temporal coding by single cochlear fibres from regions of cochlear hair cell degeneration in the guinea pig. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979; 224: 71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zurek P M, Formby C. Frequency-discrimination ability of hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 46: 108–112
   Google Scholar
• Moore B CJ, Glasberg B R. The relationship between frequency selectivity and frequency discrimination for subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. Auditory Frequency Selectivity, B CJ Moore, R D Patterson. Plenum Press, New York 1986; 407–414
   Google Scholar
• Grant K. W. Frequency modulation detection by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30: 558–563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coninx F. The detection of combined differences in frequency and intensity. Acustica 1978; 39: 137–150
   Google Scholar
• Burns E M, Turner C. Pure-tone pitch anomalies. II. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1530–1540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman F, McGee T, Kramer M. Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E F Evans, J P Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 295–306
   Google Scholar
• Kaernbach C. Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Percept Psychophys 1991; 49: 227–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemeister N F. Temporal modulation transfer functions based on modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 1364–1380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann W M, Klein M A. Theory of frequency modulation detection for low modulation frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 935–946
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demany L, Semal C. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 1295–1301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thornton A R, Abbas P J. Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638–643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R S. Frequency resolution in hearing-impaired listeners. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, B CJ Moore. Academic Press, London 1986; 309–371
   Google Scholar
• Loeb G E, White M W, Merzenich M M. Spatial cross-correlation: a proposed mechanism for acoustic pitch perception. Biol Cybern 1983; 47: 149–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srulovicz P, Goldstein J L. A central spectrum model: a synthesis of auditory-nerve timing and place cues in monaural communication of frequency spectrum. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 1266–1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins D B, Wightman F L. Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensori-neural hearing loss. Audiology 1980; 19: 495–507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall J W, Tyler R S, Fernandes M A. Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 145–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buus S, Scharf B, Florentine M. Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 77–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoski W J, Trahiotis C. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1541–1547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinkel M, Kollmeier B. Binaurales Hören bei Normalhörenden und Schwerhörigen II: Analyse der Ergebnisse. Audiologische Akustik 1992; 92: 22–34, 1/
   Google Scholar
• Kinkel M, Kollmeier B, Holube I. Binaurales Hören bei Normalhörenden und Schwerhörigen I: Meßmethode und, Meflergebnisse. Audiologische Akustik 1991; 91: 192–201, 6/
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel K J, Koehnke J, Colburn H S. Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 336–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar