Effects of Relative Levels of the Primary Tones on Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-hearing Subjects

References

• Kemp D T. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 224: 37–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibility of 2F1-F2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1986; 22: 95–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2053–2055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A M. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs, and gerbils. Hear Res 1987; 31: 25–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S J, Stover S J. Otoacoustic emissions: An emerging clinical tool. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th ed., J Katz. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 448–462
   Google Scholar
• Sun X, Kim D O, Jung M D, Randolph K J. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss in humans: Comparison of unequal-and equal-level stimuli. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 982–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 594–600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B, McCoy M, Whitehead M, Martin G. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 11–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S J. Emerging role of evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 4–12, (Suppl. 1)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography–practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; 15: 71–96, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Lafreniere D, Jung M D, Smurzynski J, Leonard G, Kim D O, Sasek J. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns. Arch Otolaryngol 1991; 117: 1382–1389
   Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Stagner B B, Coats A C, Martin G K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill S A, Brown A M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2fl-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Probst R. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2F1-F2 in normal human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 280–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen A N, Popelka G R, Osterhammel P A, Nielsen L H. Clinical significance of relative probe levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 223–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, McCoy M J, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below LI. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 2346–2358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, Stagner B B, McCoy M J, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Dependence of distortion-product emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in LI, L2 space. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 2359–2377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. American national standard specification for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1989). American National Standards Institute, New York, NY 1989
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen L H, Popelka G R, Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 159–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York 1956
   Google Scholar
• Bruning J L, Kintz B L. Computational Handbook of Statistics, 3rd ed. Scott, Foresman, & Co, Glenview, Illinois 1987
   Google Scholar
• Sutton L A, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K, Whitehead M L. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal overexposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994; 75: 161–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in humans I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 3–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Cutler W M, Martin G K. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1749–1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A. Interrelationships between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 1993; 65: 216–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace A T, McClelland W A, Weiner J, McFarland D J. Individual differences and reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: Effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 1138–1148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegel J H. Ear-canal standing waves and high-frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 2589–2597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel J H, Hirohata E T. Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies. Hear Res 1994; 80: 146–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, Stagner B B, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 3200–3214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Sound level calibration for OAE measurements. Technical bulletin, Otodynamics Ltd., Hatfield, Herts., UK. Data Sheet 1993; 12: 1–2
   Google Scholar