Studies of Prosody Perception by Cochlear Implant Patients

References

• Skinner M W, Holden L K, Holden T A, Dowell R C, Seligman P M, Brimacombe J A, Beiter A L. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor WSP II and Mini Speech Processor MSP of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 3–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H H, Tong Y C. Pitch scaling, difference limens and identification of electrical pulse rate on multi-channel cochlear implant patients–implications on temporal speech processing. Proc Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med BiolSoc 1989; 11: 1065–1066
   Google Scholar
• Pfingst B E, Holloway L A, Poopat N, Subramanya A R, Warren M F, Zwolan T A. Effects of stimulus level on nonspectral frequency discrimination by human subjects. Hear Res 1994; 78: 197–209
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear Res 1983; 11: 157–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Clark G M, Blarney P J, Busby P A, Dowell R C. Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 153–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Blarney P J, Dowell R C, Clark G M. Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 73–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White R L. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 106–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y C, Clark G M. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 1881–1888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillier N, Spillman T, Fisch U P, Leifer L J. Encoding and decoding of auditory signals in relation to human speech and its application to human cochlear implants. Audiology 1980; 19: 146–163
   Google Scholar
• Eddington D K, Dobelle W H, Brackman M D, Mladejovsky M G, Parkin J L. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple-channel intra-cochlear stimulation in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 87: 5–39, (Suppl 53)
   Google Scholar
• House W F, Edgerton B J. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982; 91: 74–89, (Suppl 91)
   Google Scholar
• Pfingst B E, Burnett P A, Sutton D. Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 1283–1292
   Google Scholar
• Pfingst B E, De Haan D R, Holloway L A. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I. Phase duration and stimulus duration. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 1857–1866
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R V. Growth of loudness for sinusoidal and pulsatile electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 13–14, (Suppl82)
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R V. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants. Hear Res 1985; 18: 135–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F-G, Shannon R V. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 235–238, (Suppl 166)
   Google Scholar
• Fourcin A J, Rose S M, Moore B CJ, Douek E E, Clarke G P, Dodson H, Bannister L H. External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Clinical, psychophysical, speech-perceptual and histological findings. Br J Audiol 1979; 13: 85–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busby P A, Tong Y C, Clark G M. Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early-and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 1058–1067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Tong Y C, Dowell R C. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processing strategies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93: 127–131
   Google Scholar
• Clark G M, Blarney P J, Busby P A, Dowell R C, Franz B K, Musgrave G N, Nienhuys T G, Pyman B C, Roberts S A, Tong Y C, Webb R L, Kuzma J A, Money D K, Patrick J F, Seligman P M. A multiple-electrode intracochlear implant for children. Arch Otolaryngol 1987; 113: 825–828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby P A, Whitford L A, Blarney P J, Richardson L M, Clark G M. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 2658–2669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 330–345
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 338–352
   Google Scholar
• Owens E, Kessler D K, Telleen C C, Schubert E D. The minimal auditory capabilities (MAC) battery. Hear Aid J 1982; 34: 9–34
   Google Scholar
• Waltzman S, Hochberg I. Perception of speech pattern contrasts using a multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 50–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell R C, Martin L FA, Clark G M, Brown A M. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985; 94: 244–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley G J, Moore B CJ. Detection of linear frequency glides as a function of frequency and duration. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 2045–2057
   Google Scholar
• Grant K W, Walden B E. Spectral distribution of prosodic information. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 228–238
   Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N, Lowder M, Tyler R S. Comparison of the F0F2 and the F0F1F2 processing strategies for the Cochlear Corporation cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 195–200
   Google Scholar