Cochlear Tuning in the Gerbil: A Comparison of Responses to Sinusoidal Amplitude Modulation and Difference Tone Stimuli

References

• Langer G. Periodicity coding in the auditory system. Hear Res 1992; 60: 115–142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sales G, Pye D. Ultrasonic Communication by Animals. Chapman and Hall, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• Holman S D, Hutchinson J B. Effects of intracranial androgens on the development of masculine ultrasonic vocalizations in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). J Endocrinol 1985; 107: 355–363
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown R E, Hauschild M, Holman S D, Hutchinson J B. Mate recognition by urine odor in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Behav Neural Biol 1988; 49: 174–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher H. The physical criterion for determining the pitch of a musical tone. Phys Rev 1924; 23: 427–437
   Google Scholar
• Schouten J F. The perception of pitch. Phillips Tech Rev 1940; 5: 286–294
   Google Scholar
• Fay R R. Auditory frequency discrimination in the goldfish {Carassius auratus). J Comp Physiol Psychol 1970; 73: 175–180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons A M, Buxbaum R C, Mirin M P. Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: Envelope and fine-structure cues. J Comp Physiol A 1993; 173: 321–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cynx J, Shapiro M. Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris). J Comp Physiol A 1986; 100: 356–360
   Google Scholar
• Heffner H, Whitfield L C. Perception of the missing fundamental by cats. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 915–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons A M, Ferragamo M. Periodicity extraction in the anuran auditory nerve. I: Pitch-shift effects. J Comp Physiol A 1993; 172: 57–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenberg S, Marsh J T, Brown W S, Smith J C. Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones. Hear Res 1987; 25: 91–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall A L, Dolan D F. Intermodul-ation distortion (F2-F1) in inner hair cell and basilar membrane responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 2061–2068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuttall A L, Dolan D F. Comment on Modulation of the hair cell motor: A possible source of odd-order distortion. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2210–2215, )].J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96: 2583–2584
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown A M. Modulation of the hair cell motor: A possible source of odd-order distortion. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2210–2215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry K R. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones. Hear Res 1996; 99: 151–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim D O, Molnar C E, Matthews J W. Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear nerve fiber responses and in ear canal sound pressure level. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1704–1721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel J H, Kim D O, Molnar C E. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2-f1 and 2f1-f2. J Neurophysiol 1982; 47: 303–328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry K R. Sharply tuned cochlear nerve ensemble periodicity responses to sonic and ultrasonic frequencies. J Comp Physiol A 1997; 181: 239–246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibian G L, Kim D O. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2-fi and 2f1-f2). Hear Res 1982; 6: 35–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibility of the 2f1 –f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheatham M A, Dallos P. Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic. Hear Res 1982; 8: 29–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalla C, Sinniger Y S, Ekelid M, Zeng F G. Distortion product oto-acoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates. Hear Res 1996; 98: 38–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kujawa S G, Fallon M, Bobbin R P. Time-varying alterations in the f2-fi DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. I: Response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents. Hear Res 1995; 85: 142–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henry K R. Auditory nerve neurophonic tuning curves produced by masking of round window responses. Hear Res 1997; 104: 167–176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Møller A R. Coding of sounds in lower levels of the auditory system. Q Rev Biophys 1972; 5: 59–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller A R. Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand 1972; 81: 540–556
   Google Scholar
• Snyder R L, Schreiner C E. Auditory neurophonic responses to amplitude-modulated tones: Transfer functions and forward masking. Hear Res 1987; 31: 79–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans E F. Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: Some physiological pros and cons. Audiology 1978; 17: 369–420
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenberg S. Possible role of low and medium spontaneous rate cochlear nerve fibers in the encoding of waveform periodicity. Auditory Frequency Selectivity, B CJ Moore, R D Patterson. Plenum, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Chertoff M E, Burkhard R. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2225–2234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith G C. Two-channel brainstem frequency-following responses to pure tones and missing fundamental stimuli. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 92: 321–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiang NY-S. Stimulus coding in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus. Acta Otolaryngol 1965; 59: 186–200
   Google Scholar
• Møller A R. Dynamic properties of the response of single neurons in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. J Physiol 1976; 259: 63–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith R L, Brachman M L. Response modulation of auditory nerve fibres by AM stimuli: Effects of average intensity. Hear Res 1980; 2: 123–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yates G K. Dynamic effects in the input/output relationship of auditory nerve. Hear Res 1987; 27: 221–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown A M. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear Res 1987; 31: 25–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisina R D, Smith R L, Chamberlain S C. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear Res 1990; 44: 99–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailer A R, Rees A. Dynamic properties of responses of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat. Hear Res 1986; 24: 203–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith R L, Passaglia C, Relkin E M, Prieve B, Nguyen M, Murane O. Modulation-following responses from the auditory periphery: Some results from gerbils and humans. Ass Res Otolaryngol Abst 1993; 16: 93
   Google Scholar
• Dolan D F, Nuttall A L, Avinash G. Asynchronous activity recorded from the round window. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2621–2627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedt R A. Spontaneous rates, thresholds and tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in the gerbil: Comparisons to cat data. Hear Res 1989; 42: 23–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolphin W F, Mountain D C. The envelope following response: Scalp potentials elicited in the Mongolian gerbil using sinusoidally AM acoustic signals. Hear Res 1992; 58: 70–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein L R. Comments on The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. [J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 94: 3215–3226, ].J Acoust Soc Amer 1994;96: 1189–1190
   Google Scholar
• Khanna S M, Teich M C. Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to amplitude-modulated signals. Hear Res 1989; 39: 143–158
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudspeth A J, Corey D P. Sensitivity, polarity and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1980; 74: 2407–2411
   Google Scholar