A Study of the Effects of Cochlear Loss on the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Specificity and False Positive Rate in Retrocochlear Assessment

References

• Swan I RC, Gatehouse S. Clinical and financial audit of diagnostic protocols for lesions of the cerebellopontine angle. Br Med J 1991; 302: 701–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valvassori G E. Diagnosis of retrocochlear and central vestibular disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988; 97: 19–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tos M, Thomsen J. Management of acoustic neuromas. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 111: 616–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps P D. Current role of magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium enhancement in current British ENT practices. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 431–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern P, Teale A, Dixon A, Freer C., Sims C, Rubenstein D, Wilkinson I, Hall L., Williams A. An audit of the clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging of the head and spine. Health Trends 1991; 23: 75–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheppard U, Milford C AM, Anslow P. MRI in the detection of acoustic neuromas–suggested protocol for screening. Clin Otolaryngol 1996; 21: 301–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher E W, Parikh A A, Harcourt J P, Wright A. The burden of screening for acoustic neuroma: asymmetric otological symptoms in the ENT clinic. Clin Otolaryngol 1994; 19: 19–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart R, Davenport J. Diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Neurosurgery 1981; 9(4)450–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welling D B, Glasscock M E, Woods C I, Jackson C G. Acoustic neuroma–a cost-effective approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 103: 364–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selters W A, Brackman D E. Acoustic tumour detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 181–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J J, Don M, Brackman D E. Electro-cochleography and auditory brainstem electric responses in patients with pontine angle tumours. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89: 1–19, (suppl 75)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauch C D, Olsen W O, Pool A F. ABR indices: sensitivity, specificity and tumour size. Am J Audiol 1996; 5: 97–104
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F E, McCormick C A, Hurley R M. Hit and false-alarm rates of selected ABR indices in differentiating cochlear disorders from acoustic tumours. Am J Audiol 1996; 5: 90–6
   Google Scholar
• Bauch C D, Olsen W O. Comparison of ABR amplitudes with TIPtrode and mastoid electrodes. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 463–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M L, Blair R L. The auditory brainstem response in neuro-otology: perspectives and problems. J Otolaryngol 1981; 10: 117–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lightfoot G R. Correcting for factors affecting the ABR wave V latency. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 211–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D R. The effects of cochlear hearing loss, age and sex on the auditory brainstem response. Audiology 1996; 35: 246–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Parbo J. Reference data for the ABRs in retrocochlear diagnosis. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 49–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates P, Stapells D R. Interaction of click intensity and cochlear loss on the auditory brain stem response wave V latency. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 28–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot G R. A sensation level correction for ILDV. Oral presentation to the 12th Biennial Symposium of the International ERA study group. VeronaItaly 1991
   Google Scholar
• Cashman M Z, Stanton S G, Sagle C, Barber H O. The effect of hearing loss on the ABR interpretation. Use with correction factor. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 153–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhamer H J, Lindstrom B, Lundborg T. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. III. Latencies in cochlear hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1981; 13: 83–94, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Arslan E, Prosser S, Rosignoli M. The behaviour of wave V latency in cochlear hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1988; 105: 467–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith W J, Greville K A. Effects of audiometric configuration on the auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1987; 8: 49–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhall U, Pedersen K, Dotevall M. Effects of presbyacusis and other types of hearing loss on the auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1986; 15: 179–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Johnson K. Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on the ABR latency. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 168–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telian S A, Kileny P R, Niparko J K, Kemink J L, Graham M D. Normal auditory brainstem response in patients with acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 10–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler C G, Durrant J D. The effects of peripheral hearing loss on the auditory brainstem response. Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J Jacobson. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 1994; 237–50
   Google Scholar
• Schoonhaven R. Dependence of auditory brainstem response on click polarity and high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology 1992; 31: 72–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin M, Moore E. Scalp distribution of early (0-10 msec) auditory-evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol. 1977; 103, 326-8
   Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K, Osterhammel P. The influence of reference electrode position on recordings of the auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 9–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats A C, Martin J L. Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked potentials. Effect of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 605–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A RD, Farrell G, Haacke N P. A noninvasive, objective test for endolymphatic hydrops. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 199I;Suppl., 479: 35–43
   Google Scholar
• Koyuncu M, Mason S M, Saunders M W. Electrocochleography in endolymphatic hydrops using tone-pip and click stimuli. Clin Otolaryngol 1994; 19: 73–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz D M, Morris M D, Jacobsen J T. The normal auditory brainstem response and its variants. Principles and Application in Auditory Evoked Potentials, J Jacobsen. Allyn & Bacon, Boston 1994; 123–54
   Google Scholar
• Fria T J. Identification of congenital hearing loss with the auditory brainstem response. The Auditory Brainstem Response, J T Jacobson. Taylor & Francis, London 1985; 317–36
   Google Scholar
• Moller M B. Hearing in 70-and 75-year-old people: results from a cross-sectional and longitudinal population study. Am J Otolaryngol 1981; 2: 22–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ISO 7029. Acoustics–Thresholds of hearing by air conduction as a function of age and sex for otologically normal persons. International Organisation of Standardisation, Geneva 1987
   Google Scholar