46
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Intensity Discrimination, Temporal Integration and Gap Detection by Normally-hearing Subjects with Weak and Strong Otoacoustic Emissions

&
Pages 251-256 | Received 09 Nov 1998, Accepted 15 Apr 1999, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Penner M J, Zhang T. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in adults revisited. Hear Res 1997; 103: 28–34
  • Kemp D T. The evoked cochlear mechanical responses and the auditory microstructure evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol 1979; 9: 35–47, Suppl
  • Köhler W, Fritze W. Pitch is influenced by spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114: 110–12
  • Long G R. Perceptual consequences of otoacoustic emissions. Contributions to Psychological Acoustics: Results of the 6th Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, A Schick. University of Oldenburg. 1993; 59–79
  • Zwicker E. Spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions, threshold in quiet, and just noticeable amplitude modulation at low levels. Auditory Frequency Selectivity, B CJ Moore, R D Patterson. Plenum, New York 1986; 49–59
  • Turner C W, Zwislocki J J, Filion P R. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 109–15
  • Probst R, Harris F P. Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 504–10
  • Long G R. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds. Hear Res 1984; 15: 73–87
  • Long G R, Tubis A. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1988; 36: 125–38
  • Cohen M F. Detection threshold microstructure and its effect on temporal integration data. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 405–9
  • Smurzynski J, Probst R. Effects of signal duration on threshold microstructure in ears with spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Diversity in Auditory Mechanics, E R Lewis. World Scientific, Singapore 1997; 270–6
  • Whitehead M L. Slow variations of the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1991; 53: 269–80
  • Florentine M, Fasti H, Buus S. Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking. I Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 195–203
  • Eddins D A, Green D M. Temporal integration and temporal resolution. Hearing, B CI Moore. Academic Press, San Diego 1995; 207–12
  • Buus S, Florentine M. Gap detection in normal and impaired listeners: The effect of level and frequency. Time Resolution in Auditory Systems, A Michelson. Springer-Verlag, New York 1985; 159–79
  • Smurzynski J, Probst R. The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject's threshold microstructure. Hear Res 1998; 115: 197–205
  • Burns E M. Equivalent levels of SOAEs estimated from loudness matches to unstable SOAEs. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1996; 19: 182

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.