EEG Power Spectral Measurements Comparing Normal and “Thatcherized” Faces

REFERENCES

• Adrian, E. D., & Matthews, B. H. C. (1934). The Berger rhythm: Potential changes from the occipital lobe of man. Brain, 57, 354–385.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre, G. K., Singh, R., & D’Esposito, M. (1999). Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. Neurology Report, 10, 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Basar, E., Güntekin, B., & Öniz, A. (2006). Principles of oscillatory brain dynamics and a treatise of recognition of faces and facial expressions. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 43–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., Sagiv, N., Mecklinger, A., Friederici, A., & von Cramon, Y. D. (2002). Priming visual face-processing mechanisms: Electrophysiological evidence. Psychological Science, 13, 190–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bötzel, K., Schulze, S., & Stodieck, R. G. (1995). Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutsen, L., Humphreys, G., Praamstra, P., & Warbrickb, T. (2006). Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. NeuroImage, 32, 352–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, V., Doyle, T., Dench, N., & Burton, M. (1991). Remembering facial configurations. Cognition, 38, 109–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, A. P., & Ali, L. (2002). Functional connectivity of gamma EEG activity is modulated at low frequency during conscious recollection. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 91–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., Schweinberger, S. R., Kaufmann, J. M., & Leder, H. (2005). The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: An event-related brain potentials study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 544–555.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1996). El error de Descartes. Editorial, Andrés Bello, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2000). Sentir lo que sucede. Editorial, Andrés Bello, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & van Hoesen, G. W. (1982). Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32, 331–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1999). Face agnosia and the neural substrates of memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1998). Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor. Neurology Report, 9, 2945–2948.
   Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2000a). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2000b). Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 145–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairclough, S. H., Venables, L., & Tattersall, A. (2005). The influence of task demand and learning on the psychophysiological response. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 56, 171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is ‘‘special’’ about face perception. Psychology Review, 105, 482–498.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, T., Harmony, T., Rodríguez, M., Bernal, J., Silva, J., Reyes, A., (1995). EEG activation patterns during the performance of tasks involving different components of mental calculation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 94, 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, N., Evans, J., Fiori, N., Davidoff, J., & Renault, B. (1996). Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 65–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gundel, A., & Wilson, G. F. (1993). Topographical changes in the ongoing EEG related to the difficulty of mental tasks. Brain Topography, 5, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Haenschel, C., Baldeweg, T., Croft, R. J., Whittington, M., & Gruzelier, J. (2000). Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(13), 7645–7650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, N. D. (1984). The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception, 15, 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmony, T., Fernandez, T., Silva J., Bernal, J., Diaz, C. L., Reyes, A., (1996). EEG delta activity: An indicator of attention to internal processing during performance of mental tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 24(1–2), 161–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haxby, J. V., Ungerleider, L. G., Clarck, V. P., Scouten, J. L., Hoffman, E. A., & Martin, A. (1999). The effect of face inversion on activity in human neural systems for face and object perception. Neuron, 22, 189–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, T., Shinosaki, K., Iyama, A., & Matsumoto, Y. (1993). Localization of activated areas and directional EEG patterns during mental arithmetic. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 86, 224–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage, 15, 353–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). Effects of repetition on upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. NeuroImage, 21, 1518–1532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Schimke, H., & Schwaiger, J. (1994). Episodic and semantic memory: An analysis in the EEG theta and alpha band. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91, 428–441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Trevarthen, C., & Sperry, R. W. (1972). Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. Brain, 95, 61–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Nikouline, V. V., Palva, J. M., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2001). Long–range temporal correlations and scaling behavior in human brain oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(4), 1370–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Smit, D. J. A., Barkil, A., van Beijsterveldt, T. E. M., Brussaard, A. B., Boomsma, D. I., (2007). Genetic contribution to long-rage temporal correlations in ongoing oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(59): 13882–13889.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marrufo, M. V., Vaquero, E., Cardoso, M. J., & Gomez, C. M. (2001). Temporal evolution of α and β bands during visual spatial attention. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 315–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milivojevic, B., Clapp, W. C., Johnson, B. W., & Corballis, M. C. (2003). Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misoriented faces. Psychophysiology, 40, 967–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missonnier, P., Deiber, M. P. Gold, G., Millet, P., Gex-Fabry Pun, M., Fazio-Costa, L., (2006). Frontal theta event-related synchronization: Comparison of directed attention and working memory load effects. Journal of Neural Transmission, 113, 1477–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, G. R., Neuper, C., Rupp, R., Keinrath, C., Gerner, H. J., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2003). Event-related beta EEG changes during wrist movements induced by functional electrical stimulation of forearm muscles in man. Neuroscience Letters, 340, 143–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. E., Yong, E., & Rhodes, G. (2000). Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychological Science, 11, 492–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgoren, M., Basar-Eroglu, C., & Basar, E. (2005). Beta oscillations in face recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 55, 51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, W. J., & Cole, H. W. (1985). EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science, 228, 750–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G. (1985). Lateralized processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 249–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Delvenne, J. F., Debatisse, D., Goffaux, V., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., (1999). Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology, 50, 173–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Joyce, C. A., Cottrell, G. W., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage, 20, 1609–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotshtein, P., Malach, R., Hadar, U., Graif, M., & Hendler, T. (2001). Feeling or features: Different sensitivity to emotion in high-order visual cortex and amygdala. Neuron, 32, 747–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagiv, N., & Bentin, S. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 937–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, A., Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2003). Expert face processing: Specialization and constraints. In G. Schwarzer and H. Leder (eds.), Development of Face processing. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, A., & Mast, F. (1999). Why is face recognition so orientation-sensitive? Psychophysical evidence for an integrative model. Perception (Suppl.), 28, 116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22, 904–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergent, J. (1988). Face perception: Underlying process and hemispheric contribution. In G. Denes, C. Semenza, P. Bisiacchi, and A. Andreewsky (eds.), Perspectives on Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum, 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Steriade, M., Contreras, D., Curro, D. R., & Nuñez, A. (1993). The slow oscillation in reticular thalamic. The slow oscillation in reticular thalamic and thalamocortical neurons: Scenario of sleep rhythm generation in interacting thalamic and neocortical networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 3284–3299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. J., McCarthy, G., Saliba, E., & Degiovanni, E. (2001). ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 910–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S. J., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2001). Seeking categories in the brain. Science, 12, 260–263.
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, D. A., Arruda, J. E., & Gold, S. M. (1993). Comparison of QEEG and response accuracy in good vs poorer performers during a vigilance task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, W., Broverman, D. M., & Klaiber, E. L. (1968). EEG and mental abilities. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 24, 166–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittington, M. A., Traub, R. D., Kopell, N., Ermentrout, B., & Buhl, E. H. (2000). Inhibition-based rhythms: Experimental and mathematical observations on network dynamics. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38(3), 315–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrobel, A. (2000). Beta activity: A carrier for visual attention. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis (Wars), 60(2), 247–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar