REFERENCES
- Alm, P. A. (2004). Stuttering and the basal ganglia circuits: A critical review of possible relations. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 325–369.
- Armson, J., & Kalinowski, J. (1994). Interpreting results of the fluent speech paradigm in stuttering research: Difficulties in separating cause from effect. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 69–82.
- Bloodstein, O., & Ratner, N. (2008). A Handbook on Stuttering. New York, NY: Delmar.
- Callan, D., Callan, A., Gamez, M., Sato, M., & Kawato, M. (n.d.). Premotor cortex mediates perceptual performance. NeuroImage, In Press.
- Cherry, C., & Sayers, B. M. (1956). Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external control, and some clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1, 233–246.
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychologicall Measurement, 20, 37–46.
- Fishman, H. (1937). A study of the efficacy of negative practice as a corrective for stammering. Journal of Speech Disorders, 2, 67–72.
- Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions, (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
- Fox, P. T., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J. C., Hirsch, T. B., Downs, J. H., Martin, C., (1996). A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature, 382, 158–161.
- Guntupalli, V. K., Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T., & Nanjundeswaran, C. (2005). The effects of temporal modification of second speech signals on stuttering inhibition at two speech rates in adults. Neuroscience Letters, 385, 7–12.
- Healey, E. C., & Howe, S. W. (1987). Speech shadowing characteristics of stutterers under diotic and dichotic conditions. Journal of Communication Disorders, 20, 493–506.
- Howell, P., & Au-Yeung, J. (2002). The EXPLAN theory of fluency control and the diagnosis of stuttering. In: Fava E. Fava, (ed.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory Series: Pathology and Therapy of Speech Disorders (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Iacoboni, M. (2005). Neural mechanisms of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 632–637.
- Johnson, W. (1959). The Onset of Stuttering: Research Findings and Implications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Kalinowski, J., Dayalu, V. N., Stuart, A., Rastatter, M. P., & Rami, M. K. (2000). Stutter-free and stutter-filled speech signals and their role in stuttering amelioration for English speaking adults. Neuroscience Letters, 293, 115–118.
- Kalinowski, J., Noble, S., Armson, J., & Stuart, A. (1994). Pretreatment and posttreatment speech naturalness ratings of adults with mild and severe stuttering. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology/American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 3, 61–66.
- Kalinowski, J., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2003). Choral speech: The amelioration of stuttering via imitation and the mirror neuronal system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 339–347.
- Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T., Guntupalli, V., & Stuart, A. (2004). Gestural recovery and the role of forward and reversed syllabic repetitions as stuttering inhibitors in adults. Neuroscience Letters, 363, 144–149.
- Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., Rastatter, M. P., Snyder, G., & Dayalu, V. (2000). Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech. Neuroscience Letters, 281, 198–200.
- Kondas, O. (1968). Experiment of the shadowing method with children stammerers. Psychologica, 19, 109–116.
- Liberman, & Whalen. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187–196.
- Max, L., Guenther, F. H., Gracco, V. L., Ghosh, S. S., & Wallace, M. E. (2004). Unstable or insufficiently activated internal models and feedback-biased motor control as sources of dysfluency: A theoretical model of stuttering,. Contemporary Issues in Communication Sciences and Disorders, 31, 105–122.
- Meisner, J. H. (1946). Relation between voluntary non-fluency and the frequency of stuttering in oral reading. Journal of Speech Disorders, 11, 13–18.
- O’Brian, S., Onslow, M., Cream, A., & Packman, A. (2003). The Camperdown Program: Outcomes of a new prolonged-speech treatment model. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 933–946.
- Pineda, J. A. (2005). The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews, 50, 57–68.
- Rao, P. V. (1998). Statistical Research Methods in Life Sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
- Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.
- Saltuklaroglu, T., Dayalu, V. N., & Kalinowski, J. (2002). Reduction of stuttering: The dual inhibition hypothesis. Medical Hypotheses, 58, 67–71.
- Saltuklaroglu, T., & Kalinowski, J. (2006). The inhibition of stuttering via the presentation of natural speech and sinusoidal speech analogs. Neuroscience Letters, 404, 196–201.
- Saltuklaroglu, T., Kalinowski, J., Dayalu, V. N., Guntupalli, V. K., Stuart, A., & Rastatter, M. P. (2003). A temporal window for the central inhibition of stuttering via exogenous speech signals in adults. Neuroscience Letters, 349, 120–124.
- Saltuklaroglu, T., Kalinowski, J., Dayalu, V. N., Stuart, A., & Rastatter, M. P. (2004). Voluntary stuttering suppresses true stuttering: A window on the speech perception-production link. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 249–254.
- Saltuklaroglu, T., Kalinowski, J., Robbins, M., Crawcour, S., & Bowers, A. (2009). Comparisons of stuttering frequency during and after speech initiation in unaltered feedback, altered auditory feedback and choral speech conditions. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44, 1000–1017.
- Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G. (1999). Early childhood stuttering I: Persistency and recovery rates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1097–1112.