Effect of Altered Central and Peripheral Visual Field Stimulation on Correct Recognition and Visual Evoked Response

References

• Bryden M. P., Rainey C. A. Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1963; 66: 568–571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchsbaum M., Fedio P. Visual information and evoked responses of the left and right hemispheres. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1969; 26: 266–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchsbaum M., Fedio P. Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to verbal and nonverbal stimuli in the left and right visual fields. Physiology and Behavior 1970; 5: 207–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler S. R., Glass A. Asymmetries in the electroencephalogram associated with cerebral dominance. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1974; 36: 481–491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaway E. Brain Electrical Potentials and Individual Psychological Differences. Grune & Stratton, New York 1975
   Google Scholar
• Cheatham P. G., White C. T. Temporal numerosity: I. Perceived number as a function of flash number and rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952; 44: 447–451
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crovitz H. F., Zener K. A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. American Journal of Psychology 1962; 75: 271–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee H. L., Fontenot D. J. Cerebral dominance and lateral diflerences in perception and memory. Neuro-psychologia 1973; 11: 167–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick A. O. Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics 1974; 16: 575–596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin E., Kubovy M., Kutas M., Johnson R., Herning R. I. Graded changes in evoked response (P-300) amplitude as a function of cognitive activity. Perception and Psychophysics 1973; 14: 319–324
   Google Scholar
• Eason R. G., Groves P., White C. T., Oden D. Evoked potentials: relation to visual field and handedness. Science 1967; 156: 1643–1646
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eason R., White C. T. Averaged occipital responses to stimulation of sites in the nasal and temporal halves of the retina. Psychonomic Science 1967; 7: 309–310
   Google Scholar
• Fedio P., Buchsbaum M. Unilateral temporal lobectomy and changes in evoked responses during recognition of verbal and nonverbal material in the left and right visual fields. Neuropsychologia 1971; 2: 261–271
   Google Scholar
• Fontenot D. J. Visual field differences in the recognition of verbal and nonverbal stimuli in man. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1973; 85: 564–569
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galin D., Ellis R. R. Asymmetry in evoked potentials as an index of lateralized cognitive process: relation to EEG alpha asymmetry. Neuropsychologia 1975; 13: 45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galin D., Ornstein R. Lateral specialization of cognitive mode: An EEG study. Psychophysiology 1972; 28: 153–161
   Google Scholar
• Gott P. S., Boyarsky L. L. The relation of cerebral dominance and handedness to visual evoked potentials. Journal of Neurobiology 1972; 28: 65–77
   Google Scholar
• Groves P. M., Eason R. G. Effects of attention and activation on the visual evoked cortical potential and reaction time. Psychophysiology 1969; 5: 394–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber R. N. Visual information storage. Visual search: symposium conducted at the Spring 1970 meeting of the National Research Council Committee on Vision Division of Behavioral Sciences. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 1973
   Google Scholar
• Haber R. N., Hershenson M. The Psychology of Visual Perception. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1973
   Google Scholar
• Haber R. N., Standing L. G. Direct measures of short-term visual storage. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969; 21: 43–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcum E. R., Jones M. L. Letter-recognition within words flashed left and right of fixation. Science 1962; 138: 444, 445
   Google Scholar
• Harter M. R., White C. T. Perceived number and evoked cortical potentials. Science 1967; 156: 406–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard R. D. Hemispheric laterality effects on a facial recognition task in normal subjects. Cortex 1973; 9: 246–258
   Google Scholar
• Hillyard S. A. The psychological specificity of the contingent negative variation and late evoked potential (P-300). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1971; 31: 302–303
   Google Scholar
• Hines D. Bilateral tachistoscopic recognitions of verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Cortex 1972; 8: 315–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hines D., Satz P. Superiority of right visual half-fields in right handers for recall of digits presented at varying rates. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 21–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John E. R., Herrington R. N., Sutton S. Effects of visual form on the evoked response. Science 1967; 155: 1439–1442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura D. Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia 1966; 4: 275–285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Spacial localization in the left and right visual fields. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1969; 23: 445–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D., Durnford M. Normal studies on the function of the right hemisphere in vision. Hemispheric Functions in the Human Brain, S. J. Dimond, J. G. Beaumont. Scientific Books, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• McKeever W. F., Huling M. D. Bilateral tachistoscopic word recognition as a function of hemisphere stimulated and interhemispheric transfer time. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 281–288, (a)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever W. F., Huling M. D. Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 15–20, (b)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever W. F., Suberi M., VanDeventer A. Fixation control in tachistoscopic studies of laterality effects: comment and data relevant to Hines' experiment. Cortex 1972; 8: 473–479
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milner P. M. A model for visual shape recognition. Psychological Review 1974; 81: 521–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishkin M., Forgays D. G. Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952; 43: 43–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble C. E. Measurement of association value (a), rated association (a'), and scaled meaningfulness (m') for the 2100 CVC combinations of the English alphabet. Psychological Reports 1961; 8: 487–521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price R. L., Smith D. B. D. The P3(00) wave of the averaged evoked potential: A bibliography. Physiological Psychology 1974; 2(3A)387–391
   Google Scholar
• Poon L. W., Thompson L. W., Marsh G. R. Average evoked potential changes as a function of processing complexity. Psychophysiology 1976; 13: 43–49
   Google Scholar
• Schechter G., Buchsbaum M. The effects of attention, stimulus intensity, and individual differences on the average evoked response. Psychophysiology 1973; 10: 392–400
   Google Scholar
• Semmes J. Hemispheric specialization: A possible clue to the mechanism. Neuropsychologia 1968; 6: 11–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperry R. W. Hemisphere deconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist 1968; 23: 723–733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrace H. The effects of retinal locus and attention on the perception of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959; 58: 382–385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanderplas J. M., Garvin E. A. The association value of random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959; 57: 147–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walley R. E., Weiden T. D. Lateral inhibition and cognitive masking: neurospsychological theory of attention. Psychological Review 1973; 80: 284–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White C. T. The visual evoked response, and pattern stimuli. Advances in Psychobiology, G. Newton, A. Riesen. Wiley, Washington, D.C. 1974
   Google Scholar
• White C. T., Cheatham P. G., Armington J. C. Temporal numerosity: II. Evidence for central factors influencing perceived number. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1953; 46: 283–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White C. T., Eason R. G. Evoked cortical potentials in relation to certain aspects of visual perception. Psychological Monographs 1967; 80, (whole No. 632)
   Google Scholar
• White M. Laterality differences in perception: A review. Psychological Bulletin 1969; 72: 387–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar