Laboratory Animals Need Only Humane Treatment: Animal “Rights” May Debase Human Rights

References

• Anderson R. D. The biology of moral systems. Aldine de Gruyter., New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Antelyes J. Animal rights in perspective. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986; 189: 757–759
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archer J. Ethical issues in psychological research on animals. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 1986; 39: 361–364
   Google Scholar
• Barnes D. M. Tight money squeezes out animal models. Science 1986; 232: 309–311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borchelt P. L., Lockwood R., Beck A. W., Vorth V. L. Attacks by packs of dogs involving predation on human beings. Public Health Reports 1983; 98: 57–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowne G. W. Role of the biomedical scientist regarding public awareness in the use of an humane treatment of laboratory animals: Past, present and future. The contribution of laboratory animal science to the welfare of man and animals: Past, present and future, J. Archibald, J. Ditchfield, H. C. Rowsell. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York 1985; 451–455
   Google Scholar
• Bustad L. K. Laboratory animal scientists and their new role in human/animal bonding. The contribution of laboratory animal science to the welfare of man and animals: Past, present and future, J. Archibald, J. Ditchfield, H. C. Rowsell. Gustav Fischer Verlag., New York 1985; 319–326
   Google Scholar
• Caplan A. L. Beastly conduct: Ethical issues in animal experimentation. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1983; 406: 159–169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caplan A. Moral community and the responsibility of scientists. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica [Supplement] 1986; 554: 78–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Churchland P. S. Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. MIT Press., Cambridge 1986
   Google Scholar
• Cohen C. The case for the use of animals in biomedical research. New England Journal of Medicine 1986; 315: 865–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coile D. C., Miller N. E. How radical animal activists try to mislead humane people. American Psychologist 1984; 39: 700–701
   Google Scholar
• Cooper T., Stucki J. C. Commentary on “Animal research—for and against: A philosophical, social and historical perspective.”. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1983; 27: 18–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curran W. J. Biomedical laboratories and criminal liability for cruelty to animals. New England Journal of Medicine 1983; 309: 1564–1565
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeBakey M. E. Muhlbock memorial lecture: Medical advances resulting from animal research. The contribution of laboratory animal science to the welfare of man and animals: Past, present and future, J. Archibald, J. Ditchfield, H. C. Rowsell. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York 1985; XIX–XXVI
   Google Scholar
• Scientific perspectives on animal welfare, W. J. Dodds, F. B. Orlans. Academic Press., New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Dubner R. Pain research in animals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1983; 406: 128–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edinger H. M. The Taub decision: An important precedent. Neuroscience Newsletter 1984; 15: 7–8
   Google Scholar
• Ewald B. H., Gregg D. A. Animal research for animals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1983; 406: 48–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farley J., Alkon D. L. Cellular mechanisms of learning, memory, and information storage. Annual Review of Psychology 1985; 36: 419–494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feeney D. M. Human rights and animal welfare. American Psychologist 1987; 42: 593–599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felthous A. R., Kellert S. R. Childhood cruelty to animals and later aggression against people: A review. American Journal of Psychiatry 1987; 144: 710–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox M. A. The case for animal experimentation: An evolutionary and ethical perspective. Univ. Calif. Press., Berkeley 1986
   Google Scholar
• Fox M. W. The question of animal rights. Veterinary Record 1981; 109: 37–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox M. W. Philosophy, ecology, animal welfare, and the ‘rights’ question. Ethics and animals, H. B. Miller, W. H. Williams. Humana Press, Clinton, NJ 1983; 307–315
   Google Scholar
• Fox M. W. Harming healthy animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986a; 189(4)6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox M. W. Status of veterinarians. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986b; 189: 497
   Google Scholar
• Frank M. Encounter on the airwaves. Physiologist 1987; 30: 265–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallistel C. R. Bell, Magendie, and the proposals to restrict the use of animals in neurobehavioral research. American Psychologist 1981; 36: 357–360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallup G. G., Jr. Animal rights. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 1986; 6: 36–38
   Google Scholar
• Science and creation: Geological, theological, and educational perspectives, R. W. Hanson. Macmillan, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Hardin G. Sentiment, guilt, and reason in the management of wild herds. Free Inquiry Winter, 1984/85; 32–35
   Google Scholar
• Hawk W. Anima. rights and human society. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986; 189: 1278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingelhart J. K. The use of animals in research. New England Journal of Medicine 1985; 313: 395–400
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs F. S. Animal rights. Journals of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986; 189: 406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson L. M., Morris E. K. Public information on research with animals. American Psychologist 1987; 42: 103–104
   Google Scholar
• Jonas A. M. The mouse in biomedical research. Physiologist 1984; 27: 330–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karlson T. A. The incidence of facial injuries from dog bites. Journal of the American Medical Association June, 1984; 22–29
   Google Scholar
• King F. A. Philosophical and practical issues in animal research involving pain and stress. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1986; 467: 405–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koshland D. E., Jr. Homo photosyntheticus. Science 1988; 239: 449
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansdell H. Review of Animal rights and human morality. International Journal of Neuroscience 1984; 24: 161–162
   Google Scholar
• Lansdell H. Rollin's article may condone immorality. American Psychologist 1986; 41: 842–843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederhendler I., Alkon D. L. Implicating causal relations between cellular function and learning behavior. Behavioral Neuroscience 1986; 100: 833–838
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lockwood R. The role of animals in our perception of people. Veterinary Clinic of North America (Small Animal Practice) 1985; 15: 377–385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowrance W. W. Modern science and human values. Oxford Univ. Press., New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Macklin R. Mortal choices: Bioethics in today's world. Pantheon., New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Malvin R. L. Are animal activists humane?. Physiologist 1987; 30: 279–280
   Google Scholar
• Mappes T. A., Zembaty J. S. Biomedical ethics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill., New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• McDonald K. L. Creating a private cause of action against abusive animal research. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1986; 134: 399–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCulloch W. F., McCulloch L. A., Anderson R. K. Perspectives on public health issues in human-animal interactions. National Forus 1986; 66: 38–40
   Google Scholar
• Mench J. A., van Tienhoven A. Farm animal welfare. American Scientist 1986; 74: 598–603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller H. B., Williams W. H. Ethics and animals. Humana Press., Clifton, NJ 1983
   Google Scholar
• Miller N. E. Understanding the use of animals in behavioral research: Some critical issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1983; 406: 113–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller N. E. The value of behavioral research on animals. American psychologist 1985; 40: 423–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller N. E. The morality and humaness of animal research on stress and pain. Annals of the New-York Academy of Sciences 1986; 467: 402–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moriarty D. D., Jr., Allen J. L. Researcher responsibilities, not animal rights: A comment on Rollin. American Psychologist 1986; 41: 842
   Google Scholar
• Nozick R. Anarchy, state and utopia. Basic Books., New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Orlans F. B. Research protocol review for animal welfare. Investigative Radiology 1987; 22: 253–258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacheco A., Francione A. The Silver Spring monkeys. In defense of animals, P. Singer. Blackwell., New York 1985; 135–147
   Google Scholar
• Pincus H. A., Fine T., Pardes H., Goodwin F. K. The animal rights movement: A research perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry 1986; 143: 1585–1586
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prentice E. D., Zucker I. H., Jameton A. Ethics of animal welfare in research: The institution's attempt to achieve appropriate social balance. Physiologist 1986; 29(17)19–21
   Google Scholar
• Regan T. The case for animal rights. Univ. Calif. Press., Berkeley 1983
   Google Scholar
• Regan T. The rights of humans and other animals. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica [Supplement] 1986; 554: 33–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rollin B. E. Animal rights and human morality. Prometheus Books., Buffalo, NY 1981
   Google Scholar
• Rollin B. E. The moral status of research animals in psychology. American Psychologist 1985; 40: 920–926
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig M. R. Human and animal rights. Nature 1985; 313: 425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowan A. N., Rollin B. E. Animal research—for and against: A philosophical, social, and historical perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1983; 27: 1–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowan A. N., Tannenbaum J. Animal rights. National Forum 1986; 66: 30–33
   Google Scholar
• Rowsell H. C., McWilliam A. A. Laboratory animal science: A global view. The contribution of laboratory animal science to the welfare of man and animals: Past, present and future, J. Archibald, J. Ditchfield, H. C. Rowsell. Gustav Fischer Verlag., New York 1985; 139–147
   Google Scholar
• Laboratory animals; Laboratory animal models for domestic animal production, E. J. Ruitenberg, P. W. J. Peters. Elsevier Science Pubs, B.V., New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Samuels W. M. Transformation of society's beliefs is goal of animal rights movement. Physiologist 1986; 29: 43–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savage-Rumbaugh S., McDonald K., Sevcik R. A., Hopkins W. D., Rubert E. Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pigmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus). Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 1986; 115: 211–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro K. J. Animal rights revisted. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 1986; 6: 112
   Google Scholar
• Simpson J. R. Animal rights re-evaluated. Free Inquiry 1984/85; 37–40, Winter
   Google Scholar
• In defense of animals, P. Singer. Blackwell., New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Smith G. P. The problem of reduction and replication in the practice of the scientific method. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1983; 406: 1–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sprigge T. L. S. Philosophers and antivivisectionism. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 1985; 13: 99–106
   Google Scholar
• The breaking of bodies and minds: Torture, psychiatric abuse. and the health professions, E. Stover, E. Nightingale. W. H. Freeman., New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Swan K. G., Swan R. C. Man's best friend or man?. Physiologist 1984; 27: 347–350
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swarbrick O. Animal rights: Consideration of phylogenetic scale. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986; 189: 1530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannenbaum J. Animal rights. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1986; 189: 406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tannenbaum J., Rowan A. N. Rethinking the morality of animal research. Hastings Center Report 1985; 15: 32–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmermann M. Ethical considerations in relation to pain in animal experimentation. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica [Supplement] 1986; 554: 221–233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar