The Variety of Relations Between Spatial Frequency and Reaction Time

References

• Bernstein I. H., Amundson V. E., Schurman D. L. Metacontrast inferred from reaction time and verbal report: Replication and comments on the Fehrer-Biederman experiment. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973; 100: 195–201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breitmeyer B., Ganz L. Implications of sustained and transient channel for theories of visual pattern masking saccadic suppression and information processing. Psychological Review 1983; 83: 1–36
   Google Scholar
• Breitmeyer B. Visual masking: an integrative approach. Oxford University Press, New York 1984
   Google Scholar
• Callaway E., Halliday R., Naylor H., Schechter G. Effects of oral scopolamine on human stimulus evaluation. Psychopharmacology 1985; 85: 133–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon P. Attention and interference in the perception of brief visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1986; 12: 133–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejima Y., Ohtani Y. Simple reaction time to sinusoidal grating and perceptual integration time: Contributions of perceptual and response processes. Vision Research 1987; 27: 269–276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksen C. W., Eriksen B. A. Visual backward masking as measured by voice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics 1972; 12: 5–8
   Google Scholar
• Fehrer E., Raab D. Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962; 63: 143–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham N., Kramer P., Haber N. Attending to the spatial frequency and spatial position of near-threshold visual patterns. Attention and Performance XI, M. I. Posner, O. S.M. Marin. Elsevier, North Holland 1985
   Google Scholar
• Green M. Masking by light and the sustained-transient dichotomy. Perception & Psychophysics 1984; 35: 519–535
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harter M. R., Aine C. J. Discussion of neural-specificity model of selective attention: A response to Hillyard and Mangun and to Naatanen. Biological Psychology 1986; 23: 297–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harwerth R., Levi D. Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection. Vision Research 1987; 18: 1579–1586
   Google Scholar
• Hughes H. C. Asymmetric interference between components of suprathreshold compound gratings. Perception & Psychophysics 1986; 40: 241–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffreys D. A., Musselwhite M. J. A visual evoked potential study of metacontrast masking. Vision Research 1986; 26: 631–642
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lupp U., Hauske G., Wolf W. Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research 1976; 16: 969–972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrone M. C., Burr D. C. Evidence for the existence and development of visual inhibition in humans. Nature 1986; 321: 235–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker D. M., Salzen E. A., Lishman J. R. The early wave of the visual evoked potential to sinusoidal gratings: Responses to quadrant stimulation as a function of spatial frequency. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1982; 53: 427–435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petry S. Perceptual changes during metacontrast. Vision Research 1978; 18: 1337–1341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proctor R. W., Nunn M. B., Pallos I. The influence of metacontrast masking on detection and spatial-choice judgements: An apparent distinction between automatic and attentive response mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983; 9: 278–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raab D., Fehrer E. Supplementary report: The effect of stimulus duration and luminance on visual reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962; 64: 326–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson J. G. Spatial and temporal contrast-sensitivity functions of the visual system. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1966; 76: 1141
   Google Scholar
• Rogowitz B. E. Spatial/temporal interactions: Backward and forward metacontrast masking with sine-wave gratings. Vision Research 1983; 23: 1057–1073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves A. Pathways in type-B (U-Shaped) metacontrast. Perception 1986; 15: 163–172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saito M. Same-different reaction times studied with a flash masking technique. Perception & Psychophysics 1982; 31: 573–576
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders A. F. Stage analysis of reaction processes. Tutorials in Motor Behavior, G. E. Stelmach, J. Requin. Elsevier, North Holland 1980
   Google Scholar
• Schechter G., Callaway E., Halliday R., Naylor H. Effects of spatial frequency of visual stimulus on reaction time and on P300 latency. Cerebral Psychophysiology: Studies in Event-Related Potentials. 1986, (EEG Suppl. 38)
   Google Scholar
• Sergent J. Role of input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. Psychological Bulletin 1982; 93: 481–512
   Google Scholar
• Smith R. A., Jr, Swift D. J. Spatial-frequency masking and Birdsall's theorem. Journal of Optical Society of America: Optics and Image Science 1985; 2: 1593–1599
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shulman G. L., Wilson J. Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information. Perception 1987; 16: 89–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders' method. Attention and performance II, W. G. Koster. Elsevier, North Holland 1969
   Google Scholar
• Tyler C. W. Sensory processing of binocular disparity. Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinical aspects, C. M. Shore, K. J. Ciuffreda. Butterworths, Boston 1983
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub D. J., Fidell L. S. A signal-detection approach to subception: Concomitant verbal and finger-latency responses in metacontrast. Perception & Psychophysics 1979; 26: 143–152
   Google Scholar