Determination of the number and waveshapes of event related potential components using comparative factor analysis

References

• Donchin E., Heffley E. F. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research, D. Otto. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC 1978; 555–572
   Google Scholar
• Dormann W., Mundlos S., Haschke R. Comparison of principal components computed with principal factor analysis on the basis of averaged and single-trial ERPs using the Fischer-Roppert procedure. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1987; 4: 319–323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas R. R., Rogers L. J. Comparative factor analysis models for an empirical study of EEG data. International Journal of Neuroscience 1983; 18: 211–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman B., Singer W. Direct and indirect visual inputs to superficial layers of cat superior colliculus: a current source-density analysis of electrically evoked potentials. Journal of Neurophysiology 1983; 49(5)1075–1091
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman J. A., Nicholson J. A. Experimental optimization of current source-density technique for anuran cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology 1975; 30: 369–382
   Google Scholar
• Freeman J. A., Stone J. A technique for current density analysis of field potentials and its application to the frog cerebellum. Neurobiology of cerebellar evolution and development, R. Llinas. American Medical Association, Chicago 1969; 421–430
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch R. L. Factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1983
   Google Scholar
• Hakstian A. R., Rogers W. T., Cattell R. B. The behavior of number-of-factors rules with simulated data. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1982; 17: 193–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe W. G. Some contributions to factor analysis. Oak Ridge, Tenn: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Report ORNL-1919. National Laboratories, Oak Ridge 1955
   Google Scholar
• Hunt E. Mathematical models of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 1985; 22: 395–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IMSL (International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc.). Edition 9. IMSL Library, IMSL, Houston, TX 1980
   Google Scholar
• Katznelson R. D. EEG recording, electrode placement, and aspects of generator localization. Electric fields of the brain, the neurophysics of the EEG, P.L. Nunez. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1981; 176–213
   Google Scholar
• Koles Z. J., Kasmia A., Paranjape R. B., McLean D. R. Computed radial-current topography of the brain: patterns associated with the normal and abnormal EEG. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1989; 72: 41–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann D. EEG assessment of brain activity: spatial aspects, segmentation and imaging. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1984; 1: 267–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzdorf U. The physiological causes of VEP: current source density analysis of electrically and visually evoked potentials. Evokdpotentials, R.Q. Cracco, I. Bodis-Wollner. Alan. R. Liss, New York 1986; 141–154
   Google Scholar
• Mitzdorf U., Singer W. Laminar segregation of afferents to lateral geniculte nucleus of the cat: An analysis of current source density. Journal of Neurophysiology 1977; 40: 1227–1244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Möcks J. The influence of latency jitter in principal component analysis of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1986; 23(4)480–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möcks J. Decomposing event-related potentials: a new topographic components model. Biological Psychology 1988; 26: 199–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Möcks J., Verleger R. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: a note on misallocation of variance. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1986; 65: 393–398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholson J. A., Freeman J. A. Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology 1975; 38: 356–368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez P. L. Electric fields of the brain, the neurophysics of the EEG. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1981
   Google Scholar
• Rogers L. J., Douglas R. R. Comparative factor analysis models for an empirical study of EEG data, II: a data-guided resolution of the rotation indeterminacy. International Journal of Neuroscience 1984; 22: 263–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösier F., Manzey D. Principal components and varimax-rotated components in event-related potential research: some remarks on their interpretation. Biological Psychology 1981; 13: 3–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shors T. J., Ary J. P., Eriksen KJ., Wright K. W. P100 amplitude variability of the pattern visual evoked potential. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1986; 65: 316–319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone J., Freeman J. A. Synaptic organization of pigeon's optic tectum: a Golgi and current source-density analysis. Brain Research 1971; 27: 203–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Rotterdam A. Limitations and difficulties in signal processing by means of the principal-component analysis. IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engineering, BME-17 1970; 268–269
   Google Scholar
• Wastell D. On the correlated nature of evoked bran activity: biophysical and statistical considerations. Biolical Psychology 1981; 13: 51–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood C. C., McCarthy G. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1984; 59: 249–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar